Was feminism invented to actually destroy women rather than improve them...

Was feminism invented to actually destroy women rather than improve them? While it's true that a nuclear family is against human nature, it certainly improves society. Human nature and "liberation" means that we as men should simply be able to fuck and impregnate any woman as we please, then simply leave after the deed is done. Inner city Chicago is what human nature is meant to be. At the end of the day it is true that we are nothing more than animals, however most animals are better off when domesticated and feminism does not want that domestication to take place

Most feminists don't call for society to turn to the law of the jungle, dude. And most feminists aren't against the nuclear family.

"feminism" wasn't invented . It's the culmination of the west's continual drive towards liberty and self determination when applied from a different angle.

If anybody in particular benefited from it, it would be capitalists that introduced a huge new workforce into the market and dropped the value of labor, strictly speaking for americans.

Globally, feminism is still very much about selfdetermination and personal liberty, which are respectable virtues.

...

Feminism's main purpose was to effectively double the size of the labor pool, it was untapped potential up until recently.

...

>(((capitalists))) are the only ones who actually benefit from feminism

Wow really makes you think huh

This is humanities you faggots

>Was feminism invented to actually destroy women rather than improve them?

yeah how dare women be able to vote and to get their fair share of societies resources and be able to thrive the same as men

>Human nature and "liberation" means that we as men should simply be able to fuck and impregnate any woman as we please, then simply leave after the deed is done.

oh fuck off

...

>Little swastika on the dog collar
>doll is doing the salute

Given how they vote, yeah it was a mistake.

Tbh we should just go back to a strict aristocracy and disallow all commoners the right to influence politics, seeing as how the average man is more often than not just as mediocre as the average woman.

feminism does nothing to liberate the talk about psychological violence on men from women

feminism does nothing to liberate the talk of raped men inside a household

feminism favorizes the abortion whithout even the requirement to inform the father

feminism does nothing against coerced paternity

feminism does nothing about the inequality favouring women on the dating game

feminists actually do not promote intellectual independence as a men is considered a sexist scumbag as soon as he disagrees with them or even try to nuance their positions

do you still believe that the feminists fight for equality ?

>How dare X group I align with do Y sensible thing I will phrase to appear as a very sensible proposal

Even your sarcasm has a formula. Go back to your website.

...

If someone should go, it's you /pol/tard.

The bigger question is why the nuclear family at all when almost all of human history and culture was about the extended family unit?

>this is humanities
>"learning concerned with human culture, especially literature, history, art, music, and philosophy."

No it's not. It's /r9k/ victimhood with some /pol/ thrown in. Go away.

/pol/tards seem to think the idealised culture of the 50's stretched back for thousands of years.

As are their idealised notions of race and nationalism too. Their entire ideology is nothing but a myth. They are essentially a 1950 historical reenactment society

If they were going to reeanct it they would have wives ands kids and at least attempt to dress well.

There's nothing wrong with being Jewish

Where did you get this totally disturbing picture???

It doesn't matter how well society improves.

If we don't have technology for a space program then the human race is a dead end no matter how enslaved women are to raising families.

Honestly, if we had a technocracy and had state run orphanages raising super scientists it might be better than family units.

Unironically this

>While it's true that a nuclear family is against human nature
stopped reading right there.