Origins of Western Civilization

Paper here on this culture which proposes that Indo European languages spread into Europe through this culture/civilization.
> journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172952

The very fact that you and I are using the phonetic alphabet to communicate with each other, use the Sumerian base 12 system for time and some aspects of mathematics (like the degrees to a circle), and use a modified Egyptian solar calendar of 365 days proves that our culture is the direct result of the civilizations that I mentioned and not some proto-ukr pottery merchants that >One of the most notable aspects of this culture was the periodic destruction of settlements, with each single-habitation site having a lifetime of roughly 60 to 80 years

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cucuteni-Trypillian_culture#Vin.C4.8Da-Turda.C5.9F_script

>Yes they did, they were the ancestors of Western Europeans, we're their descendants.

Members of the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture shared common features with other Neolithic societies, including:

An almost nonexistent social stratification

Lack of a political elite

Rudimentary economy, most likely a subsistence or gift economy

Pastoralists and subsistence farmers

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cucuteni-Trypillian_culture#Economy

Looks like this culture never got past the stone age. They were most likely conquered by stronger, more innovative peoples i.e. the Greeks, Huns, Byzantines, Ottmans, Russians

I stand corrected: They just BARELY made it into the bronze age before getting dominated by the Indo Europeans

>Toward the end of the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture's existence (from roughly 3000 BC to 2750 BC), copper traded from other societies (notably, from the Balkans) began to appear throughout the region, and members of the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture began to acquire skills necessary to use it to create various items. Along with the raw copper ore, finished copper tools, hunting weapons and other artifacts were also brought in from other cultures. This marked the transition from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic, also known as the Chalcolithic or Copper Age. Bronze artifacts began to show up in archaeological sites toward the very end of the culture. The primitive trade network of this society, that had been slowly growing more complex, was supplanted by the more complex trade network of the Proto-Indo-European culture that eventually replaced the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture

OP
I'm a 18 year old syrian kid that lived my whole life in brazil. Seeing how Syria is almost gone,
I now want to know more about the roots of my ancestry and the knowledge of my ancient people, also their philosophy and spirituality
Can you guide me? Are sumerians, babylonians and assyria ancient syrians?

>Unfortunately

They were good successors to the Sumerians

>Are sumerians, babylonians and assyria ancient syrians?

No

what are they then?

Something that you haven't put in is the origin of Greek people and their ties with Indians and Mongols/China.

Greeks were part of the Indo-aryan tribe that came from the Yamna tribes, which resided somewhere around central asia. It was a nomadic group of people that lived in those area. One of the branch moved across west to Greek areas, another tribe moved east towards China, and another moved south towards India.

On the west, these nomadic tribesmen establishes Greek cities and learns from the neighboring Mesopotamian culture and the Egyptian culture. In the south, the nomadic tribesmen establishes northern Indian civilization and learns from the old dravidian indus valley civilization. Things like meditation, yoga, etc are probably part of that culture.

So fastforward, bit around 600BCE and you have the the Median empire, which connects two of the long lost senpaitachi, the Greeks and the Indians. Median empire allows transmigration of ideas between the two, they are now aware of each other and in contact with each other through ideas/trades/etc. And later on couple during Alexander's conquest did another second flow of cultural information exchange.

Fast forward to ~200 BCE, the tribesmen who went east towards China are growing large, they are the powerful Yeuzi nomadic horde. However they were defeated by another rising star, the Xiongnu. As they went west, they met and defeated the Scythians and pushed Scythians further west. However Yeuzi went southwest to Bactria and established what is known as Kushan empire.

The a brief/short/poorly connection between the EastAsia/Western Europe/SouthAsia.

The with the Scythians/Sakas, pushed to the European frontier, they then did the classic nomad thing.

With the Yuezi, Kushans, gone from Xiongnu area, the Xiongnu tried expanding south towards China. They lost badly. They were pushed west as far as Chinese could extend, and the remnants of the Xiongnu later became ruling class of the Hun empire that terrorized the west once more. The Huns also happen to terrorize the Kushans(Yeuzi), their former enemies, and India as well.

With the power vacuum created by the destruction of Xiongnu from the central asia, the Xianbei group established power over the region. They later formed the Rouran khaganate. Gokturk khaganate rose to power within Rouran and tookover. Like the Xiongnu of the past, it was a confederacy of indo-european and asiatic people in ruling structure. When the Gokturk split, the Mongols rose up. Who then terrorized much of the known world.

The interactions between the cultures of east/west are more connected than people think. The uniquess of "asia" and uniqueness of "west" and the uniqueness of "south asia" are myths. All three of those culture are linked either directly or indirectly.

>uniqueness of west/east are myths
that is true of central asia/mena/indus area but less true of china.

OP here. To my best understanding, the people of modern day Syria are the result of thousands of years of different cultures and civilizations. I mean, maybe some Syrians can trace their ancestry exclusively to the original Sumerians, but most likely they have roots from other influences.

The Sumerians generally are associated with southern Iraq, and were conquered by semitic peoples from the eastern Mediterranian which then eventually formed in the two states of Assyria and Babylon. A lot of influence from the Hittites, Egyptians, and Phonecians as well.

Then came the Persian and Greek conquests of Syria. Then the Romans and later Christian crusades. Then the Islamic conquests (which still today probably have the greatest influence on Syrian culture). Even the Mongols invaded Syria, so you probably have Khan blood as well. Then finally came the Ottomans.

So in short, the modern state of Syria is a melting pot of dozens of empires and cultures, with Islam and Arabs being the greatest influence and not the Sumerians/Akkadians.

The comments on that video are cancerous.

"Western civilisation" is such a vague term. It's almost always used in an Orientalist context to portray the "West" as superior to mysterious but backwards "East".

WRONG! It was actually in FRANCIA that Western Civilization was born.

>These cultures laid the foundations for our way of life and are sadly overlooked and forgotten.

What? Those are some of the most well-known and famous civilizations ever to exist you retarded flatcap drong.

>The Sumerians generally are associated with southern Iraq

No, central Iraq. The southern part was underwater during the Sumerian period.

I mean overlooked and forgotten on Veeky Forums. It's always about the Romans and Hitler
what you're referring to is the alluvial plain, but Sumer was still in southern Iraq

What we call Western Civilization starts with the Franks, we are as much greco-roman as the romans were trojans.

see

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Western_civilization_before_AD_500

Isn't it true that Ancient Egypt had an understanding of general relativity before Einstein

lol no