Why can't we have a globalized world without borders as well as a continuation of ethnic cultural spheres...

Why can't we have a globalized world without borders as well as a continuation of ethnic cultural spheres? Wouldn't that be a nice balance between globalism and nationalism?

Don't you want cultural enrichment from Mutumbo and Abdul?

Why isn't Cyprus on that map?

Because that map is fucking wack

Japan should have its own sphere

>"no"

Turkey is European.

Fuck off you weaboo scum.

>Turkey is European.
WE

Does India really have more influence than China over SEA?

It's cultural influence. Buddhism began within the sub-continent (iirc)

SEA (except Vietnam) was Indianized for centuries and in many places still is

no that is racist

>Haiti is Western
>Falklands are Spic
Nice try, Blacky.

Why is Philippines red?

Because making Haiti green would trigger spic autism so much.

>muh Christianity

Because wealth is always concentrated in a few areas making the rest of the world shit.

Even shittier

>Russia
>western

>japan
>buddhist

You just don't know anything about demographics.

>north Africa
>arab

>america
>shit health care, no real care about the population, focuses on supersition and who can talk 'real good'
>westernised

Well southeast asia uses alphabets derived from indian and their architecture, although unique, resembles indian quite a bit

vietnam on the other hand has chinese looking architecture and used the chinese alphabet until recently, so i'd say he's accurate in that regard

Objectively yes. Wouldn't find these otherwise. Zen.
Not Muslim or Oriental or African.

The Falklands are full of English-speaking British who want to stay part of the UK. If Haiti gets to be Red, the Falklands certainly do.
Haiti should be African, though, since Guyana is Hindu.

Everything out of the Mediterranean is a late comer to Christianity and civilization.

Really user the map is jackshit

No it's not it's accurate to a T.

You're brainwashed, doesn't matter which school, just go to any school to undo your cultural fascism.

No, it's eastern

Eastern/Buddhist. Burma has more genetic and linguistic relation to Sinics than it does to India. Only it's religious legacy and script is Indic and even then resembles the East more. Sri Lanka has lingual relation to India but is technically Buddhist just like Pakistan and East Pakistan is Muslim.

No, Russia is eastern. There should be an 'eastern' cat for eastern europe and russia.
Not on about the jap bit

As it stands this utopian ideal would not be sustainable. The very "you do your thing and I'll do mine" attitude upon which cosmopolitanism depends basically doesn't exist outside the west. They would gladly tear apart Anglo-Saxon values and impose their own and believe they are right in doing so.

The map you posted isn't made up of ethnic cultural spheres you dingus.

There's no point in any case it could b a subdivision of a greater region. Otherwise might as well make a Shia, Chinese, and Shinto category too.
>The Shinto world.
>The Slavic world

>that image
I'm American, what do I have in common with a Spaniard, a Frenchman, or a Greek? How is Portugal close to Finland or Australia but not Brazil? What do Mauretania and Kazakhstan have in common?

The way people understand "race" as opposed to ethnic groups is beyond retarded. People in Ethiopia and Nigeria, or hell different parts of India or Burma, are very different ethnically and genetically. There are no "blacks" or "whites" or "asians", there is a continuum.

It's not a map of ethnic groups.

>They would gladly tear apart Anglo-Saxon values and impose their own and believe they are right in doing so.

What do you mean by that you guys did it first lol and not to mention you always forget foreign groups taking up and integrating western culture themselves.

What makes Kenya Christian but Nigeria westernized and Christiann?

>balance with nationalism
>nations don't exist

Religious and cultural traditions and linguistics in SEA was heavily influenced by the ancient subcontinental kingdoms in India; South East Asian Buddhism, the root of the culture for many of those nations, did not evolve uniquely from Indian Buddhism like Mahayana Buddhism did, but was taken directly from the Sri Lankan doctrines of Buddhism

theres lot of surprising cultural similarities you can notice between India and SEA countries, but even moreso between Sri Lanka and SEA countries (especially, in descending order, Thailand, Lao&Cambodia and Burma)

>world without borders

>Hungary and Romania are not western part

Trash.

>Philippines
>European

>world without borders
>one culture does very well, the one next door is a third world shithole
>shithole people all just leave their shithole to leech of prosperity
>prosperous culture becomes an equally miserable shithole

Russia, Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Cyprus, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Moldova, Albania Romania, Ukraine and Belarus aren't western senpai. They are Orthodox or Muslim and have a quite different history than the West.