Why did wikipedia remove photos representative of ethnicities on their pages about ethnicities? Was it SJWs?

Why did wikipedia remove photos representative of ethnicities on their pages about ethnicities? Was it SJWs?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Images/Archive_6
twitter.com/AnonBabble

yes it was SJWs and it's all because of the jews. you can go home now.

Oh thank god

There's a picture of blonde guy in "blonde hair" article

I actually watched it happen. It was quite amusing.

It was all because someone insisted on putting a Somali immigrant in the "Swedish people" infobox and they simply wouldn't accept that it wasn't appropriate because the infobox was supposed to show ethnic Swedes. They kept arguing that there was no such thing as ethnic Swedes and this went on and on until the admins decided it would be better just to get rid of the infoboxes entirely.

'Typical' members of ethnicities are a meme. Think of how many different skin tones fall under African American, and how many people have a mixed ethnic background.

kek, sounds like a /pol/ deep cover operation

Yeah, but probably isn't. Just your typical Swedish politically correct insanity.

>it's another outliers and variation exist therefore averages do not episode

>memes.com watermark
Kill yourself.

>Kill yourself.

Look at him being so new that he thinks that "kys" is the original form.

Seriously, kill yourself.

What the fuck is your problem? His image has memes.com on it and you get THIS triggered? Brainlet detected holy shit

Seriously,

link to the discussion page or it didn't happen

There is no worse possible offense than posting watermarked images. Watermarked images incarnate everything that is wrong with this world.

Literally worse than Hitler.

Kill yourself.

back to 9gag with you faggot

...

You know why son.
>These faggots can't refute so they hone in on a watermark
Please stop mucking up this board with your lefty desperation.

Don't you know? Merely admitting phenotypical variation exists is a fascist construct! Celebrate diversity, but don't actually notice it!

If you use a site called memes.com you deserve to be fucking shot

it's hardly a deep cover operation if they are repeating your words back at you

Where do you think this argument goes for example. Unlike you, there are people who follow their arguments to their logical conclusion, they stop because they think it would lead to an embarrasing conclusion

>watermark necessarily means he saved it from said website
are you autistic?

>doesn't even have the common courtesy to edit out the watermark to avoid situations like these

Brought it on himself desu.

You couldn't have answered my question better.

>where do you think we are.jpeg

Judging from the compression artifacts in that pic you probably saved that from some meme aggregator as well you fucking shitebag.

you caught me bub.

Why do redditors derail threads they don't like? It's pathetic.

seriously impressed with myself getting three dubs in a row desu

Go read the fucking interview you stupid piece of shit. She didn't went back because of political correctness idiot

you can read about the ruling here
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Images/Archive_6

there was an SJW who kept editing the Swedes page, but the ruling seems more about the difficulty in choosing representatives than identity politics

cool wojaks