Shut it down. The goyim know

Don't people ever get tired of this race stuff? At the end of the day it doesn't matter if your race accomplished wonders and you're the great-great-great-great-great-great grandson of some king if you currently live in a shack or are loser NEET living in your mother's basement. It means fuck all. Are you a noble? Are you rich? If yes good if not this stuff is irrelevant.

>nothing in common with other indo european words
is this bait? the similarities are enormous, not even on a lexical level, but on a cultural level with regards to deities, naming practices, religious practices. and then theres fucking dna evidence.

Race is important

Why?

I repeat: The woke level in this thread is too high

>deities, naming practices, religious practices.

Provide some examples

Did Dravidian India have enforced hrt regiments?

>English: Mother
>Sanskrit: Mātár
>English: Father
>Sanskrit: Pitár
>English: Son
>Sanskrit:Sūnú
>Latin: Duo (two)
>Sanskrit: Dvā́(u) (two)
>Latin: Septem (seven)
>Sanskrit: Saptá (seven)

the fuck sort of trash meme is this? The similarities linguistically are much more than coincidental, and don't even get me started on haplogroups and anthropological evidence

i feel sorta bad for sperging this hard over race n shiet, never did this for egyptian we wuzzery

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srbinda
Since we're talking about Sanskrit.

>2. Sanskrit words have nothing in common with "Indo-European words". Not even the letters look remotely similar.
O rly?

what is "hrt"?

Magic

deities: dyaus pita-deus-jupiter-Zeus pater-Tiwaz fader
Suil-Sol-Helios-Surya
Perun-Percunas-Parjuna
Naming practices: frequent 'dual element' names, often taking about glory or horses, battle, etc.
Leucippus, Svetasva(both mean white horse, 2nd element is from same root)
Eurycles-Urusrava(both meaning wide glory)
religious practices-importance of hospitality
latin flamines vs aryan brahman
kshatriya class vs. equestrians(trifold division)
sacrificing animals to the gods

there a shit ton more similarities that get especially esoteric, things like sword cults, mannerbunds, religious oaths, poetic similarities, similarties of mythos, importance of cows

tell me >:(

look it up

>b-but indians are ary-

PFFFT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

>mfw indian nationalists seriously believe they are the original aryans on the sole basis that they got raped by aryans thousands of years ago

please explain to me you indian origin believers why didn't indo european language expand east of northwest india then, explain to me how this proves your biased "indian" origin of the proto indo european peoples?

>b-but muh sanskrit

look up fucking lithuanian, modern lithuanian for a real alive indo european language

Please mods, can we ban threads with any variation of "what race were X" or "X race is/isn't Y" in the OP? I've been on Veeky Forums since the beginning but it's really getting out of hand at this point.

> muh lefty safe space
What's up boy? Can't handle the truth?

horses originated in india dufus

I don't care what you say as long as you don't clog up the board by using the same text and image macro I've seen over and over again to argue how the same old point about how black the ancient Egyptians weren't.

This board needs to be safe space from dogshit subjects which are spammed non stop.

Why are Pajeet nationalists so retarded?

>the Indus Valley civilization
Was not Aryan. Aryans came to India later, when it was already gone.

we desparetly need a moderator to limit the /pol/bait to one or two threads. make Veeky Forums great again

>Pic related is a sculpture of a dancing girl in 2500BC in the Indus Valley civilization. Why would they (the supposed Aryan "race" make a sculpture of an inferior of a lesser caste and bring importance to her?

The Aryans came after the Indus Valley civilization. As far as I know, no one claims the Indus Valley was Aryan. Secondly, there is absolutely linguistic evidence of Sanskrit being indo european. There was an aryan (or indo-european) arrival; probably more of a migration and assimilation than an invasion. This isn't stormfag shit, this is mainstream consensus

>indus valley
>aryan
kys

It really isn't and we don't need 50 threads a day about it.

>The Aryans came after the Indus Valley civilization. As far as I know, no one claims the Indus Valley was Aryan. Secondly, there is absolutely linguistic evidence of Sanskrit being indo european. There was an aryan (or indo-european) arrival; probably more of a migration and assimilation than an invasion. This isn't stormfag shit, this is mainstream consensus
It depends what you mean by 'Aryan'. Despite the fact that Persians/Iranians were cucked into abandoning their native religions, they remain more 'aryan' than most Indians.

Fact.

you racist poltard. aryans were brown and are from india. indians went to europe. europe is ours. indians rule britain.

Horses were domesticated in the pontic steppe, earliest signs of horse domestication are only found in southern russia, ukraine, caucasus, central asia.

The origin of the hourse is unknown, there were horses in every continent except for australia roaming about.

Retard.

so much racist butthurt from losers who got replaced by alpha indians at their domestic job and housing market.

we beat you at your home turf.

>t. Seamus Smith

Indian populations do have some caucus origins, the ones that are lactose tolerant anyway.
cam.ac.uk/research/news/indians-and-europeans-share-a-milky-past

>Secondly, there is absolutely linguistic evidence of Sanskrit being indo european. There was an aryan (or indo-european) arrival; probably more of a migration and assimilation than an invasion

Haitians in the Caribbeans speak Creole, which has roots from the French language. It doesn't mean that Haitians as a whole have any connection to the people in France. Even if it were true, then the language was passed to people to people, rather than people to land.

this

Avestan is much closer to an 'original'; Sanskrit has tons of non-IE loans all over the place.

Sanskrit is just a dravidian dialect, while Avestan directly developed in the homeland of the Aryans and thus didn't get too much influenced by non-Aryan influences.

Because clearly a large majority of the world still identifies by race and culture?

You can say it doesn't matter and wish it were so, but it clearly isn't the case.

>1. Aryan is not a race. It's a Sanskrit word for noble. Nowhere does it refer to people of a different race or appearance. This is evident in Vedic and Buddhist texts.
correct 100%.
also aryan =/= proto-indo-european. it's a cultural-linguistic self-designation only of the indo-iranian subgroup.
>2. Sanskrit words have nothing in common with "Indo-European words". Not even the letters look remotely similar.
they have a lot in common if you care to look at the evidence. there is an overwhelming amount of regular correspondences that can be systematically explained through sound changes
>3. If the Aryan invasion theory is correct then that means the original habitants of the Indus Valley were Dravidians and Vedic literature and knowledge is Dravidian in nature.
scholars today speak of aryan migration rather than "invasion". it is indeed likely that the indus valley people were dravidian speakers, though the evidence is not conclusive. this doesn't mean vedic literature originated from them though. it obviously came from the people who spoke vedic sanskrit - the immigrating aryans. hinduism in its many form probably arose as a result of a complex interaction of introduced ("aryan") and native (possibly "dravidian") elements as do all religions.
>4. The caste system is not something this supposed race came up with. Every civilizations has their class of people.
true. while the indian caste system is a special case, it can be compared to other systems of social hierarchy. i'm not sure what your point is here though.

(cont.)

cont.
>5. There is no historical evidence or literature of this supposed invasion ever taking place. Surely if it happened then it would mean they would have recorded it if it changed the very foundation of their society and civilization.
again “invasion“ is a misleading word. there is however a lot of evidence for aryan migration into india both linguistic and archeological. one example is archeological remains of vedic horse sacrifices as described in the vedas being found in the steppes where indo-aryans are thought to have come from as well as the same thing in later sediments in india corresponding to the time of immigration. this is just one of many examples. you say they should have recorded it, but how would they have done that? with writing they didn’t have?
>7. The theory itself (...)
while european superiority fantasies may have played a role in earlier research into IE origins, that is not the case any more today. nobody claims that PIE originated in europe, it came from the pontic-caspian steppes on the very edge of eastern europe, hardly where most researchers are from. also nobody would claim that the place where it came from is in some way better than any other. nobody says that people who live in eastern ukraine and southern russia today are the chosen master race. that would be ridiculous.
the languages of india and those of europe may look very different today but we can see the common origins more clearly the further we go back in time. culture, math, science, food etc. are irrelevant - those are aspect that change quickly and can be introduced from any kind of inside and outside influence without changing the fact that the LINGUISTIC origins are the same
>8. Pic related is a sculpture of a dancing girl (...)
i don’t get this question, it doesn’t make sense in any way and rest on several erroneous assumptions.

>Indus Valley were Dravidians
Disputed.
>Vedic literature and knowledge is Dravidian in nature.
Oh I see you're dumb. Not worth reading/debating beyond this point.

>2. Sanskrit words have nothing in common with "Indo-European words". Not even the letters look remotely similar.
Holy shit you're might be actually retarded! Please be bait.

>Disputed.
While historians can't seem to figure out the language of the IVC, most would agree that they came after or near the end of the civ.

The issue is far from settled, and may never be, that's what disputed means.

Oh and if you're OP kill yourself and reincarnate with more than a two digit IQ.

Satan trips.

Both the Paki-nigger who claims the north did everything and the Dravidian-nigger who claims the south did everything need to fucking kill themselves. Or get into an argument. I'd like to see how that goes to be honest.

Not an argument

>hurr durr Sanskrit word for "Mother" is "MatR". See guise! It's the same!