Believing human civilization is only about 11000 years old despite humans being over 180 thousand years old

>believing human civilization is only about 11000 years old despite humans being over 180 thousand years old
>thinks "early" civilization just started off with advanced knowledge of meteorology and stone working
>thinks the oceans rising due to the end of the ice age correlating with when Solon was told Atlantis was sunk is just a coincidence

Other urls found in this thread:

scientificamerican.com/article/just-how-little-do-we-know-about-the-ocean-floor/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>believing human civilization is only about 11000 years old
Try 5000, retard.

>Solon
literally who

>thinking that earth is more than 2000 years old

We only have records going back a few thousand years, before that who fucking knows dude

We don't even know anything about the Roman Kingdom, how are you going to speculate on human civilization 11,000 years ago

literally where did you get an education?
Gobekli Tepe is now recognised by (quack)ademics as the "earliest" human civilisation

gee it's almost like figuring out things from scratch is harder than building upon previous work.

>Gobekli Tepe is now recognised by (quack)ademics as the "earliest" human civilisation
It isn't. Civilization requires specialization and more importantly, writing. Those niggers couldn't write.

>Gobekli Tepe is now recognised by (quack)ademics as the "earliest" human civilisation

No it isn't, moron. It's the earliest large structure but no-one thinks it's a civilization.

We are too intelligant for this board, OP

A T L A N T I S
T
L
A
N
T
I
S

It is clearly evidence of civilisation. Just because they lived differently to us does not diminish the fact that they clearly had specialisation, a high level of organisation, and great rock carving skills as well as an understanding of meteorology

Writing is a requirement for civilization. Are you dense?

Just because they didn't write on the walls doesn't mean they didn't have writing...

>r

You obviously don't know what the words you're using mean. A civilization requires CITIES, that's literally what the word signifies.

No it isn't, writing invariably comes along a little while after beginning to live in cities but it's not an actual requirement.

Prove they had writing then.

>formats his post with meme arrows for maximum condescension but never actually gets to the fucking point of what he is trying to say

The cities were flooded when the ice caps melted

Ice age never happened, it's a literal hoax.

Then why has no trace of them ever been found? You realize we have this thing called "radar" that has been used to map the ocean floor?

Do you really think an ancient city over ten thousand years old could survive under the ocean? especially if the flood happened rapidly...

No reason to assume they did either though, unfortunately.

...

>he believes in the ice age

I think there would be SOME evidence, yes. I think this because we HAVE found plenty of human remains in the regions flooded since the ice age, many small villages and stone tools, but never a single trace of a city.

>ice age

Sonar, I think, more than radar. I think lidar is common nowadays too. Seismic surveys have the capacity to penetrate the subsurface, I imagine a city would be highly reflective.

>not knowing that human civilization is only 1000 years old
>falling for the "Antiquity" and "Early Middle Ages" memes

We don't have any information of 90% of the sea, contrary to popular belief. Hell there are SPECIES that exist on our planet that we have yet to discover

>
>We don't have any information of 90% of the sea, contrary to popular belief. Hell there are SPECIES that exist on our planet that we have yet to discover
Name one species we havent discovered yet retard

my future gf

>We don't have any information of 90% of the sea, contrary to popular belief.
That's a bold statement. No information of 90% of the sea. So on a bathymrtric map, a whole 90% is just interpolation, or indeed even made up nonsense?

That guy does not know what you are talking about.

>Name one species we havent discovered yet retard

Did you make that Atlantis thread yesterday? Atlantis was a myth.

This. The Earth is only 6000 years old anyway.

Lol retard alert.

Inb4 lel I was just being ironic.

Not the same guy and I don't think describing it as "no information" is right and I don't know what his point about species was, we are still discovering new species on land, however we don't have very detailed bathymretric maps for the majority of the sea floor.

scientificamerican.com/article/just-how-little-do-we-know-about-the-ocean-floor/

>Inb4 lel I was just being ironic.
But it was blindingly obviously a joke
Take your autism meds

Fuck you moron. There are supposedly several undiscovered species, and you can't even name ONE? kek. Your argument sucks

>Name one species we haven't discovered yet retard

I really hope this is just maximum shitposting.

You faggots can't even form a coherent argument, and I am supposed to be the shit poster.

You claim there are undiscovered species but you can't even name one... just admit you are wrong

The zimbabwean banded leopard

New species are discovered all the time, user. They don't have names until they are discovered because they haven't been discovered yet, hence undiscovered.

I seriously hope you are just fishing for 'yous' and these last few posts haven't been an attempt to make what you thought was a genuine point.

You're conflating what people believe and what they have evidence for OP.

The farthest back we have evidence of civilization is Göbekli Tepe, but that's just a temple, it doesn't demonstrate centralization in a way civilization does.

If we found evidence of civilization going back 100,000 years, we would obviously change our minds.

>New species are discovered all the time, user.

And yet you can't even name ONE undiscovered species

>They don't have names

How convenient. Another example of the circular logic of the religion of science. "Umm wr can't name any because, umm, t-they don't have names!" Pathetic.

>they haven't been discovered yet, hence undiscovered.
Really made me think

>I seriously hope you are just fishing for 'yous' and these last few posts haven't been an attempt to make what you thought was a genuine point.
I have made a genuine point and none of you have yet to counter it. Name ONE undiscovered species and I will fuck off.

Why would something that hasn't been discovered have a name?

Dude, just stop being baited. Please.

Why wouldn't it? Ever heard of black holes, idiot?

A few years back I saw this thing on display, and I was thinking how amazing it was that an object that's at least 35,000 years old survived from prehistoric Europe. Then I realised that the people who made it were as distant from the OOA group as we are from them.
Who knows what religions and ways of life have been lost? What civilisations pre-date even Gobekli Tepe?

Thinking the world is older than last Thursday.