Did fascism get an unfair start?

Did fascism get an unfair start?

How would fascism be viewed today if it didn't appear right before a large war?

And I mean fascism, not national socialism.

Bump

IDK, (((They))) taught it to me synonymously. It would probably be same shit, different day.

Maybe if the Pink-skins would be all-inclusive towards their extermination of the weak, inefficient and timid and the exemplification of traits of the strong, intelligent, and hard-working, then it could get boots off of the ground before some above-average autist realize what they're doing is wrong. But I highly doubt it. Civilization has reached it's peak buddy. Implementing any one of those plans that gained popularity in the 20th century would be like putting extra spoilers on a Lamborghini, yeah it'll get you a bit further, but not much

>p.s, I used Triple parenthesis cause I thought it would be funny, I'm not a pink skin

Fascism is the exact cause of the war though. Your asking how the ideology would be viewed if it were different and non-expansionist.

>Fascism is the exact cause of the war though.

>Fascism is the exact cause of the war though.

>Fascism is the exact cause of the war though.

>Fascism is the exact cause of the war though.

you're a really good goy

You would need to have a new generation of Futurists to give it substantial youth backing and groundswell.

You would need to present a practicable and tangible vision of a new nation that would include everyone perceived as citizens of the current one.

You would need to sell the extremists and economists that corporatist organization is not only beneficial, but vital to the future of the nation.

You would need to somehow convince traditionalists and progressives that they are on the same side.

Toss in a couple of other improbables and you'd be halfway to giving it a fair start.

>samefagging

Fascism only had an unfair start because it's a shitty, flimsy and temporary ideology (if it can even be called an ideology).

Hitler is literally the only reason we don't live in a Fascist world today. Without him being a massive, cocky, idiot sperg, the allied powers probably would have sided with Mussolini, Franco, etc. against the Soviet Union when the time for war finally came, as the allies were dominated by moneyed classes that had no interest in advancing the socialist revolution.

Even if we disregard Hitler, one can say that facism is pretty shitty and populistic, giving no real solutions.
The people noticed that and thats why they dont elect facist leaders. Just look at France

>considers le pen to be a fascist
get out

The French election was proven to have been tampered with via destruction of ballots.

By all facets of French law, Macron holds the office illegitimately and a violent ousting would be legally justified.

You're gonna have to provide a source and no, blogspot.com is not a credible source.

Lepen lost because she's unlikeable and her party is associated with some very ugly things in the past.

You're just as bad as the lefties who cry about "Russians" hacking the elections.

>Le Pencil
>fascist
Her father might have been, but she's just a generic Israeli stooge.

The "people" of France didn't vote. Voting turnouts were quite low.

LePen's platform, ideology and MO are nothing like Fascism at all.

>and her party is associated with some very ugly things in the past.
facism

her father was a national socialist
she is a regular facist

There is nothing fascist about her, she's a generic socialist and the only thing that stands out about her is that she's anti islam and EU. Be my guest if you think that constitutes fascism.

LePen has never organized a paramiltiary to beat up dissenters, killed Jews or promised to invade other nations.

>she is a regular fascist
BWHAHAHAHAHAHHSSHHAHAHAHAHA
>Le "i lost to a pragmatic centrist" Pen
>is a fascist
nice shitposting, now go back to /idontknowpoliticsandgetmynewsfromAP/