ITT: things you here from other people that instantly signal that they know nothing about history

>Muh Islamic golden age!

This, everyone knows the Afghans are also Aryan!

It is overblown but there was deffinitly a period of relative intellectual prosperity in the Muslim world especially Persia, and especially when compared to early middle ages europe.

I just don't like it when people ignore the Jewish and Christian scholars who contributed

>rome was fascist

naziboo detected

>Dresden was a war crime

>Christianity caused Rome's collapse

>White people conquered the world because of Guns, Germs and Steel

low quality bait or just a stupid /pol/ user

Holy fuck, you are delusional or baiting. Perhaps even both.

This.

>how can there be turkic people in central asia and western china when turkey (THE COUNTRY!!) is so far away
>uighurs are just muslim han chinese
>the aryans were iranian
>what are the indo-europeans??
somebody really actually said this to me

> Civil war was about slavery

>"Deus Vult"

>Palestinians are the closest genetics-wise to ancient Hebrews
>Modern Egyptian people share no genetic relation to ancient Egyptians
>Modern Han Chinese share no genetic relation to ancient Han Chinese
>Maronites are more Phoenician than Lebanese Muslims

The only history that matters

to be fair all the factors wouldn't have been an issue if they just banned the practice

>agricultural economy became independent of industrialization due to slavery
>they had to divide the country into what can and cannot have slaves
>different economies caused conflicting policies
>unneeded conflicts due to this division
>"where do we put the trains in the slave states or the free ones?"
>states succeeded without any consultation because they voted an abolitionist in

not a single factor is not connected to slavery or the slave economy created by it in some way.

>ruling caste
This one is particularly retarded because it implies that the same dynasty ruled for thousands of years.

DEUS

LO

VULT

Have you really met a person who has made that statement?

more like
>people using the crusades out of context of the era to compare it to modern day terrorism

>pre-historic hunter gatherers were matriarchal

>Asks Veeky Forums opinion

>America is mirroring the fall of the Roman Empire

>everyone was dirty and had rotten teeth

Applicable from the Bronze Age up until about 1914 apparently.

Yes, the current Facebook darling following the Manchester attack is some Muslim guy comparing the crusades to ISIS.

Well you're not very knowledgeably of Egypt, not know that each King bred like an animal, while putting his family in charge of all the administrative positions in the Kingdom. Most new dynasties came from the lesser houses and administration, so these people are related, or from the same bloodline.

The only real discontinuity came from foreign peoples taking over the Kingdom, such as the Libyans, who ruled the Kingdom for 200 years, from around 950 BC.

people forget that not all people in history ate poisons like soda and potato chips like they do today.

>Maronites are more Phoenician than Lebanese Muslims
This one's true though, and your opinion here contradicts your opinion on the first three statements.

>Nazi racial theories and policies were all about whyte powerr hurr if you weren't blond the SS would shit on your mom's face
>Every conqueror in history was literally Hitler cause they killed people and stuff
>Sparta noble and best Ancient City state!!1! I'd love to be a Sparten :DD They fought well 'n shiet.
>English comes from latin.
>The Byzantine Empire was in constant decline. Always. Sad. Very bad.
>Caesar was killed even though he didn't do anything wrong, like, he was betrayed man, I think.

Can't you skip the subject? Just "Deus vult" is fine, I think.

Shit, the object I mean.

>Operation Barbarossa wasn't preemptive
Mein neger.

>the 4th crusade was justified because of the """latin massacre"""

This

>Illiterate Arab/Seljuk warlords conquer crumbling Byzantine and Sassanid empires
>Both of which have educated populi and well maintained trade routes
>populace of said empires produced certain achievements
>achievements are appropriated by ruling class and are now Islamic achievements

I will concede that as time went on this changed and there were actual Arab/Moor greats who cropped up and changed the game for the better.

>Cultural apropriating barbarians conquers declining and crumbling Diadochi-states.
>All of which have educated populi and well maintained trade routes
>populace of said empires produced certain achievements
>achievements are appropriated by ruling class and are now Roman achievements.
Welcome to the realities of stable conquests 101

But everyone knows that the golden age of Greek philosophy predates Roman conquest, user.

yes. Talk to any basic bitch neoliberal normie after a terrorist attack

(you)

>The Roman golden age was actually the golden age of Greek philosophy
What sort of timetraveling universe are you from?

>Neoliberal normy
There's no such thing where I'm from

>all my male friends on normie book, including the bernie bros, realize how shitty islam is. They even say shit like "religion of peace!" after an attack

>mfw its only women, even highly educated ones, that repeat the meaningless shit like this, use appeal to emotions, and just start calling everyone racist

women are destroyers of civilizations with their mawkish bullshit.

Are you arguing that's the case or do you not understand the word "predates?"

I'm simply pointing out the nonsensical nature of your comment.

>The Aztecs and Inca were more advanced than the Spanish!
>lol line infantry tactics are retarded. They just stood there to get shot at!
>The Great Divergence didn't start until the 19th Century.
>Columbus wasn't important.

>The church fathers were Roman Catholics
>Hitler was the sole reason why Germany hated Jews
>Native Americans were Europeans
>Aliens and space-time travel!

>Germany didnt exist until 1871

>Vikings had horned helmets

>Protestantism destroyed Europe

>Columbus wasn't important.
What sort of retard makes such a statement?

>Nazi racial theories and policies were all about whyte powerr hurr if you weren't blond the SS would shit on your mom's face

It basically was though. They just budged the boundaries of white arbitrarily justify their exclusion of those they'd later kill and oppress.

>The Civil War wasn't about slavery

The Confederate constitution literally had a clause that prohibited slavery from being abolished.

>Allies were the 'good guys'