Why did they kill him? What did he do to deserve that?

Why did they kill him? What did he do to deserve that?

The Bolsheviks were afraid that he was going to fall into the hands of the incoming white forces and were afraid he'd be used as a figurehead to legitimize the white movement.

That's the actual reason. Now go and blame Jews, posters below me.

If it's either Nicholas was malicious or painfully incompetent for his role, I'll go with incompetent for his role. Maybe he deserved to be executed, but certainly not his family, but I very much doubt morality was a factor in his execution.

Nicholas was really a product of the system. He was a moron and perpetual juvenile but given absurd levels of power and responsibility because of the system he was born into.

If he was in a civilized state he'd have been reduced to just shattering champagne bottles on new warships and ribbon cutting. But instead, time to lead an army in WW1.

And that's why he pissed everyone off so bad he got shot

Nicholas entering WW1 was a last ditch effort to save his regime. Tannenberg sealed his fate.

>j000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000s gib (You)s :^)

here's your 1

...

Because he was incompetent, and the soviets acted swiftly to take advantage of the situation at the time, since they didn't want to lose momentum on their revolution

>incompetent

How? What would you have done differently? It's easy to criticize when you have the benefit of hindsight.

>>incompetent

There's something about opening fire on unarmed civilians in a peaceful demonstration that just doesn't add up.

He deserved to die. He literally defended terrorists against Austria that murdered the heir of the country.

Also he went full retard and invaded Germany.

...

Allied with Germany. Let Austria deal with the Serbian terrorists.

I mean really. Any rational person with an IQ more than 80 would have not invaded the country with the worlds most advanced military. He did it because he thought the Serbs were "Muh brothers!"

Even if I was born into that time, I would have known that shooting the head of state's heir is not the right thing to support even if I had autism or mental retardation.

>What would have I done differently?
Stop imperial ambitions on the Far East, since it was incredibly hard to move supplies with a barely finished Railway.
Continue with the reforms, hell even adopting a constitutional monarchy, thus allowing peasants a better life. That would have been enough to appease them until economic growth kicked in.
Attempt to avoid war with Austria over Serbia, since Russia was unprepared, and if not possible, not assuming command of the forces.

> Why did they kill him?
He was a threat to their rule.
> What did he do to deserve that?
His rule leaded to more Russian deaths than all previous emperors combined.

He deserved everything he got.

Don't believe the Russian shills on this board. Paid by the boatloads to idealise Nicholas and convince the masses he was a good boi dindu nuffin.

>tfw Nicholas was the only person in the room that deserved the ire of the people and he got the easiest death--immediate and fast--compared to his children, who were agonizingly and brutally killed over the course of 20-25 minutes; two daughters even survived long enough to regain consciousness when they were carried outside and because the executioners couldn't fire the guns again for fear of being heard, the girls were stabbed repeatedly and when that didn't work, their faces were bashed in with rifle butts until they died choking on their own blood, teeth and shattered bones

that's stupid. when you start talking about shills you are no better than /pol/

>implying European monarchs had any power left by the 1900s.

AFAIK both Russia and Germany were actually run by military elites. Nicholas and Wilhelm had some power no doubt, but the majority of the decisions were taken by other people.

Besides these men probably knew less about history and politics and economics than the average retard on this board, considering they were kind of forced to take the position of kang.

> the majority of the decisions were taken by other people.
like this... military elite... man

This

Not really an excuse as a good leader simply hires the best men for the job

He didn't made any "decisions", stop with this meme, he's just over-glorified healer

>His rule leaded to more Russian deaths than all previous emperors combined.
And rule of every other leader of countries that fought in WWI, WWII, your point is retarded

Contemporary people believed that he did, which means that system was pretty fucked up if such possibility was considered real.

Other rulers also deserved to be killed. Sadly, nobody was here to bring them to justice.

>What would you have done differently?
not declare war on Austria because of their completely justified aggression towards Serbia

By cutting off the head of the Royal Family they removed a big source of legitimacy for the Whites.

>muh Bloody Sunday
Nicholas wasn't even in St. Petersburg at the time.

Reminder that Alexander II was doing all that and was LITERALLY on his way to signing a Constitution when some socialist faggot blew him up.
Just another example of socialists ruining everything.

>muh Holocaust
Hitler wasn't even in Auschwitz at the time.

>the executioners couldn't fire their guns inside
U wot, they did shoot at the girls, the jewels they had sewn into their dresses and pillows are what saved them from the bullets.

If you make lie big enough, and repeat it enough, it will become truth in the public's eye.

>muh ebull Nazis!
Please explain how Nicholas could've ordered anything having to do with Bloody Sunday when he wasn't in the city.

Using the working class to fight wars

The first thing Alexander III did is to tear up his plans. Pretty dick move from him.

>the executioners couldn't fire their guns inside

That's not what I said. Reread what I wrote.

>two daughters even survived long enough to regain consciousness when they were carried outside
>when they were carried outside

IT'S THE FUCKING KIKES THEY KILLED OUR TSAR (who we would consider to be subhuman anyway but that's not the point).

REEEEEEEEEEEEE

How can you claim equality if better people still walk among you?

>Bolsheviks were jews.
>Jews had already murdered a Tsar with explosives before.
>USSR was jewish conception
>USSR was funded by jewish capitalists
But it wasn't the jews, I swear on me mum!

>implying that USSR was not in fact a crypto colony of the eternal anglo

can you read

>Implying Czechoslovak legion was part of Whites

>What did he do to deserve that?

He was objectively the worst leader Russia ever had.

How? If some asswipe peasant just murdered your father, who legitimately gave a fuck about the plight of his people, I'm pretty sure that is going to fuck up your prospective on things.

They were required to honor the alliance.

only 20% of the central committee (bolshevik ruling council) at the time was Jewish

Czech Legion was certainly allied with the Whites. They were in an alliance with Kolchak's regime at the time. They were basically his enforcers in Siberia, hoping that if Kolchak won he'd keep his word and ship them off to the US

This isn't true for Russia. Russia was indeed run directly by Nicholas, which is why it was such shit.

Wilhelm wasn't an absolute monarch but Nicky very much was

>What did he do to deserve that?

What has a soldier of an enemy army done?

Nicholas wasn't an absolute monarch past 1905 my friend.

Nonsense, they just wanted to go home. They sided with the whites as a matter of necessity, but they left Russia as soon as they could and had no ideological attachment to any of the three factions fighting the civil war.

I dont disagree with what you said, but they were still an essential force of the white unit. The most well equipped/trained army the Whites had

He undid all his reforms by 1912, which is why the 1917 revolution happened

The Tsar was still popular in 1905, but was fairly despised even by the religious peasantry by 1917

They were only notionally white, they didn't take orders from the white leaders and they didn't take part in any major battles, they just seized the railway because they happened to be on it when the war started, and leveraged this control for a return trip to Czechia.

as long as theres a member of the royal family alive, the monarchy could be reestablished or will want to be reestablished by others

Over 80% of the politburo standing committee were jews. NKVD was mostly jewish in leadership... The whole ideology was jewish.
>jewish beauty in architecture
>jewish beauty in structure
>jewish beauty in paintings and poetry
>jewish priorities, bureaucracy and mammon

>source: my ass

And no, MS paint images are not a legitimate source.

>Why do you cut the head of the roses that stand out?

When you're doing something such as a revolution where you get a lot of people pissed enough to start a civil war in the middle of a bigger war, you have to make sure the royal bloodline is extinguished.

>tfw you didn't get to see Denikin, Wrangel, and Kolchak form a military triumvirate to lead the Russian nation to glory

Nothing. The Soviets were disgusting scum of humans and they destroyed all of Russia's cultural heritage.

Russia's cultural heritage at the time was a stinky railrod paved with the blood of peasants.

The reason it was so hard for Russia to reform was the entrenched Boyars, if the Tsars had as much power as you pretend they would have reformed properly a century earlier

t.doesnt read history

Politburo standing committee didn't exist in the USSR, that's China.

-Lenin (not Jewish)
-Andrey Andreyev (not Jewish)
-Aleksei Badayev (not Jewish)
-Andrey Bubanov (not Jewish)
-Nikolai Bukharin (not Jewish)
-Vlas Chubar (not Jewish)
-Felix Dzerhinsky (not Jewish)
-Grigory Evdokimov (not Jewish)
-Mikhail Frunze (not Jewish)
-Mikhail Kalinin (not Jewish)
-Lazar Kaganovich (Jewish)
-Lev Kamaneve (Jewish)
-Moisei Kharitonov (Jewish)
-Sergei Kirov (not Jewish)
-Nikolay Kolotilov (not Jewish)
-Nikolay Komarov (not Jewish)
-Stanislav Kosior (not Jewish)
-Ivan Korotkov (not Jewish)
-Nikolay Kubiak (not Jewish)
-Emanuel Kviring (not Jewish)
-Mikhail Lashevich (not Jewish)
-Dmitry Lebed (not Jewish)
-Ivan Lepse (not Jewish)
-Dmitry Manuilsky (not Jewish)
-Alexander Miansnikian (not Jewish)
-Vasily Mikhailov (not Jewish)
-Anastas Mikoyan (not Jewish)
-Vyacheslav Molotov (not Jewish)
-Ivan Morozov (not Jewish)
-Ivan Moskvin (not Jewish)
-Nariman Narimanov (not Jewish)
-Mamia Orakhelashvili (not Jewish)
-Sergo Ordzhonikidze (not Jewish)
-Grigory Petrovsky (not Jewish)
-Georgy Pyatakov (not Jewish)
-Karl Radek (Jewish)
-Christian Rakovsky (not Jewish)
-Janis Rudzutaks (not Jewish)
-Alexi Rykov (not Jewish)
-Turar Ryskulov (not Jewish)
-Mykola Skrypnyk (not Jewish)
-Alexander Smirnov (not Jewish)
-Joseph Stalin (not Jewish)
-Leon Trotsky (Jewish)
-Alexander Tsiurupa (not Jewish)
-Nikolai Uglanov (not Jewish)
-Konstantin Ukhanov (not Jewish)
-Mikhail Uryvayev (not Jewish)
-Kliment Voroshilov (not Jewish)
-Isaak Zelensky (Jewish)
-Pyotr Zalutsky (not Jewish)
-Grigory Zinoviev (Jewish)

31 members, 7Jews = 22%

20% of the Central Committee, the ruling council in Lenin's time, was Jewish

As for the Politburo, it wasn't the most important organ under Lenin, that was something Stalin solidified. The Orgburo and Secretariat were of equal importance with the Politburo at the time.

Rest of this post is just butthurt rambling. Read a book about the USSR before crying about it

I'm pretty sure this guy is joking and knows he's ugly.

It's hard to tell though.

Pol has no self awareness. I doubt it