Glory to the Yellow to Olive Master Races (Greeks, Chinese, etc.)

Something Something Migrants.

You realize that Japanese are Chinese, correct? They invaded the Ainu who lived there before them.

They aren't, genetically they're quite distinct

WE
E

>Romans aren't white
You are the /pol/ here. They were unquestionably Caucasian. Take your neo-Nazi retardation somewhere else.

Southern/Upper Egyptians were the majority of Ancient Egypt. Their art confirms it.

Substantiate your claims with facts and evidence.

>Caucasian

We're in the 21st century.

We already know what Ancient Egyptians were most like (Bedouins and Saudis).

...

>japan
WE WUZU WHITU PIGGU N SHITU

That study is Roman era Lower Egypt and it doesn't say they were Bedouins or Saudis lol. In any case, I've autistically studied their art and they clearly depicted themselves as brown; darker than asiatics and Libyans while lighter than southern nubians. Today's Southern Egyptians are their closest match. To really settle this, we need more definitive studies but this is probably the best answer we have until then.

...

White people literally and Unironically started every Civilization and in the future this won't be controversial

>That study is Roman era Lower Egypt

Nope. Starts at New Kingdom.

> it doesn't say they were Bedouins or Saudis lol

>most like

>In any case, I've autistically studied their art and they clearly depicted themselves as brown; darker than asiatics and Libyans while lighter than southern nubians.

There are plenty of browner Bedouins and Saudi.

Example

>KANGZ.

>cock sucking the nips this hard

Cucking for non-Whites is allowed as long as Hitler supported it.

Hitler also supported Islam.

Well more than plenty of them were brown and that study only sampled Middle Egypt. The vast majority of art shows them as exactly what you see in Upper Egypt and Nubians today. I suspect that it was probably a mix of two types; the Nubian/Southern Egyptian type which was in Upper. And the Levant type which populated Lower Egypt. The art to me shows a greater preponderance of the former phenotype; the lighter phenotype is seen in asiatic foreigners as well as some native women. Perhaps power gradually moved North throughout the Hyksos rule or maybe later during the Plotemiac era.

So are Greeks Persians and Egyptians.

>2000+17 year of our lord
>people unironically don't know what Caucasian means
Caucasian is an umbrella term referring to individuals from Europe, North Africa, West Asia, and South Asia.

Not all of them came to be in the Caucasus or around it (see Natufians).

Why are african anericans so desperate to pretend egyptians were black? It's honestly kind of pathetic.

You don't have to be from the Caucasus to be Caucasian. Are all Germanic speakers German then?

They're a mongrel farm equipment population (not just mixing between seperate tribes and kingdoms but also mixing with Euros).

So just call it West Asian or something.

That's bullshit though.

Saudi isn't a group.

Sure it is, Billy Bob/Tyrone.

Im just going by the art user. They were not Bantu or west Africans. But the bulk of them were clearly brown

Your post is a complete non-sequitur. Stop trying to derail this thread.

He's trying to detail this into a "we wuzz thread" by painting you as a hotep.

Sure it isn't.

No sweetie it's peer reviewed

Why?

So source?

>What is human genetic clustering

Too many populations in Europe to North Africa to the the Middle East didn't get their phenotypes in the Caucasus or largely descend from fellows who did.

Which is why they're divided into sub-races. But the general rule is Europeans and MENA+India cluster together more than anyone else outside. It's convenient categorization. I'm still baffled as to why the three race system is rejected by modern anthropology.

nature.com/news/mummy-dna-unravels-ancient-egyptians-ancestry-1.22069

>middle easterners at the forefront of everything for 90% of recorded history, more if we remember they were really ahead since the agricultural revolution
>euros get ahead for a speck of time of 500 years
>WHITES ARE TRULY THE ONLY CIVILIZED RACE LOOK AT THESE IQ GRAPHS

lol...

Middle Easterners are not ahead since classical Greece

Stay salty sandcuck

>Monobrows
>white

Ahahahhahahaha... no

That's an Enlightenment era myth, that with Greece Europe just ate some Mario mushroom and was one level up forever from that point

That Westario you're dreaming of already touched a Koopa and got smaller by the 3rd century, and by then the region had access to most of Greece's accomplishments

>WE WUZ KANGS OF HEROES N SHIEET

It still makes no sense to use it. We have the science to actually pinpoint a person heritage spot on and not rely on phenotype or appearances.

Mono brows are pretty common in Eastern Europe and in parts of France
Also
>blue eyes
>not white

>falling for the "enlightenment is shit" meme
Pleb

Lapis lazuli was relatively common back then and was probably the best material they had to represent the translucent aspect of eyes.
Sumerians didn't have blue eyes as far as i know.

>Chinese
>Starting Civilisation
Nice one, Zhang.

>what is yellow river

>Japanese
>white

>Greeks
>brown

Is this bait? If not, I suggest you take a look at pictures of people of these nationalities.

>Civilization begin with the brown race (Mesopotamians, Egyptians, Greeks, Chinese)

Replace Greeks with India it make sense also Chinese are not brown

Greeks were civilized before Chinese

Japs are much whiter than Greeks.

The test says the samples came from Abusir el-Meleq, which is northern Egyptian. You'd expect people from southern Egypt to have more SSA admixture given the observable phenotypical differences today (the ancient northerners in this test were 6-15% SSA and otherwise very Bedouin).

Even if they were (which they aren't, you weeb), Japs are still not white.

word

Because they're both brown.

>maymo

I love that fucking dog.

Why are GReek women so notorious for being ugly?