Why did arranged marriages die out in European and America?

I'm the OP and I can confirm. Parents love me but I might as well be a plank of wood to women. Sometimes I hope ISIS wins; I kinda chuckled seeing all the normies get Akbar'd in the Manchester attack.

To be fair there's always some barren hunchback window with a harelip they need to get rid of somewhere in the area, it's just that r9kers don't would hit on them even in their nightmares, nor do they suspect they could be forced to marry anyone less attractive than a 6/10.

I remember some guy a while ago who regretted that fathers don't buy whores to give their sons some experience, here's for him.

Marriages were purely a matter of law. Inheritance, status and such bullshit. Then the love meme came along.

Know someone who was adopted as an adult by their relatives because they had no sons. Apparently a very common thing in Eastern cultures.

>window
widow
>don't would hit
wouldn't hit

I should just sleep.

The age of the Indian superpower can't come soon enough.

This. Romantic Love is a complete fucking meme. You can actually trace its development.

...

I actually bought flowers for my lady today so she thinks I love her

you don't

Have you actually put forth a serious effort when it comes to meeting women for the purpose of fucking? Have you tried different approaches, worked on your sexual confidence, worked to learn from your experiences, etc.? Or have you just, like so many men on the Internet, given up without really giving it a serious effort?
I mean, I get it if you're like a 1/10 or 2/10 or 3/10 in looks... that's rough. But if you're just average-looking, maybe even a bit fat, but basically a 4/10 or up, you've got no excuses.
The West is also ahead of the rest of the world, which I think is not a coincidence.

whites used to be like that too, concerted marriage was what the Godfather about - families are just corporations that produce children.

harsh bruh harsh

so he would be matched with a women who is just as defective. You godless materialist pinkos don't even apply your ethos to the bedroom. Socialists in the steets, capitalists in the sheets.

The whole economic perpetuation angle of marriage no longer applies because women work, it lowers wages across the board and make it impossible for the average pleb to build wealth.

I honestpy think it's a better system, lets you focus on other things in life while being sure you'll have a child. The couple is pretty much forced to stay together so as not to ruin their reputation so in the end the children at least get two parents.

You'd have to give up on sexual freedom though.

It's time to seize the means of reproduction, comrade.

Romantic love s a fucking meme anyway so you might as well treat it like an enjoyable business partnership than le true love Disney movie

>Robot can't get a gf
>Muh specific situation applies globally fucking west why can't my parents hand me a gf on a silver platter
CHAD is eating PIZZA and fucking STACEY while he LAUGHS at YOU while YOU whine on Veeky Forums about your RELATIONSHIP FAILURES

It's always the same song and dance with these fucking threads. Knee jerk virgin shaming and insults.

I feel your brain OP. Sexual liberation is catching up to the western world in a horrible way. The demographic shift is going to be a real kick in the ass when all of the white boomers die in the next fifteen years.

Hedonism over logic and reason in the west.

Women care only about swallowing dick then moving to another dick then another and another and another and another.....

Women ruin everything men are fine with fucking who they want.

There stopped being a population surplus and increased social mobility meant individuals' wealth was less and less the result of inheritance.

I'm an Indian and I think you have a wrong view of arranged marriage. They are incredibly pragmatic. They depend on your status, personality and looks. Just like western marriages. If you're good looking, affable and either wealthy or in a job/field where you will be wealthy you can have the pick of the bunch. The reason there are more marriages and fewer divorces is because both sexes have a more pragmatic view of marriage. Which is to say, the love going out of a marriage isn't grounds for divorce. Women's position in society is also highly dependent on being married so they'll tolerate a lot, this will go down in the future.

>The West is also ahead of the rest of the world, which I think is not a coincidence.
Correlation != Causation

The west was well ahead of the rest of the world when women didn't have any rights.

Yeah. Being murritard I would learn Spanish, being euroscum arabic.

But that's exactly it. Dumb roasties fell for the "le one true soulmate" meme. I know tons of regular dudes who are engineers and get ignored since they're not Chad. Marriage needs to be more like a business deal with your friend than a romantic comedy.

Basically the eternal female ruins every thing.

yfw the west at the height of its power was also very racist and restricted women to the home

lol

That could still happen. You're just to fugly for people to even think about that.

Source: a guy who gets poon thrown at him on the regular

His rag is probably in his parents room

Arranged marriage is the best. The thing is, you don't know what's best for you, you often let the dark side of you choose mate. Parents only want the best for you. Let your parents choose your mate, and it's gonna be a very good marriage

I'm wh*te but thanks. I'm actually jealous of Indians and Muslims for this. I argue this in public but normies are incapable of understanding.

>very racist and restricted women to the home
Are these supposed to be negatives?

The normies and leftypol shills here would tell you yes

Are you the guy I replied too?
If so, yeah, I can never tell on this shithole of a board. I just want to discuss history in typical Veeky Forums fashion, but Normalfags and Redditors want to make it anti-/pol/ (even though /pol/ was instrumental in getting this board made)

Excluding more than half of the population is good?

Do people who are famous for dying count?
This one always makes me jej.

(10 December 1968, Russia) While reading about nuclear accidents, a physicist found this Darwin Award. Mayak is a nuclear fuel processing center in central Russia that was experimenting with plutonium purification techniques. The report states that they were using "an unfavorable geometry vessel in an improvised operation as a temporary vessel for storing plutonium organic solution." In other words, they were pouring liquid plutonium into unsafe equipment.

Keep an eye on the shift supervisor.

"It was noticed that the solution was a combination of organic and aqueous solution [gunk in the tank.] Two operators [instructed by the shift supervisor] used an improvised setup to decant the dark brown [concentrated plutonium] organic solution. The shift supervisor then left to tend to other duties. During the second filling of the bottle, a mixture of aqueous and organic solution was drawn in. As a result, the operators stopped filling the bottle."

One asked the shift supervisor for further instructions. He was told to continue decanting the solution. This operator "poured it into the 60 L vessel for a second time. After [most] of the solution had been poured out, the operator saw a flash of light, and felt a pulse of heat. Startled, the operator dropped the bottle, ran down the stairs, and from the room."

The plutonium was too concentrated, and he had accidentally started a nuclear chain reaction! The alarms sounded, and everyone evacuated. So far, no fatal errors. But a second criticality happens while everyone is safely underground. Here's where it gets good.

>excluding half the population of wageslavery is bad

t. liberals in the middle class

"The shift supervisor insisted that the radiation control supervisor permit him to enter the work area. The radiation control supervisor resisted, but finally accompanied the shift supervisor back into the building. As they approached the basement room where the accident had occurred, the radiation levels continued to rise. The radiation control supervisor prohibited the shift supervisor from proceeding. In spite of the prohibition, the shift supervisor deceived the radiation control supervisor and entered the room."

So, with things more or less under control, the shift supervisor tricks the radiation control supervisor and goes into the room full of plutonium.

His "subsequent actions were not observed by anyone. However, there was evidence that he attempted to pour [the plutonium] into a floor drain. His actions caused a third excursion, larger than the first two, activating the alarm system in both buildings."

The shift supervisor proceeded to set off an even bigger nuclear chain reaction!

"The shift supervisor, covered in plutonium organic solution, immediately returned to the underground tunnel. He died about one month after the accident," having received four times the fatal dose of radiation. Everyone else survived.

Even if the shift supervisor had lived, he would still qualify for a Darwin Award. That much radiation causes sterility.

I definitely think arranged marriage shouldn't be stigmatized. A major problem is that relationships are no longer treated as a social contract, and are something done for entertainment. It's not restricted to just women or men, Western courtship in-general has been fucked over by stagnated economies and overly liberal social morals.

:(

GOD DAMN IT WRONG THREAD