What made non-chinese so dumb?

This map is bullshit. Vietnam for example is above most European countries.

>he didn't look at the map

>britcucks are literal brainlets

...

>tfw raised Episcopalian and became an atheist

>Botswanna
lmao

Everyone cheated on the PISA dummy

>Northeast Asians like NE Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans are the most "evolved" humans.

There's no such thing as more evolved. This isn't pokemon.

Brain size matters but there is a reason why humans are smarter than whales, and why women have the same IQ as men. Encephalisation is the single factor that correlates most closely with intelligence.

The map shows "native populations", it doesn't reflect modern ones.

Did you notice pic related?

It just means that NE Asians the furthest point of evolution of Homo Sapiens
Just like how Neanderthals are considered more evolved than Homo Erectus

>It just means that NE Asians the furthest point of evolution of Homo Sapiens

They aren't you idiot.
By that extension humans who stayed in one place would be more evolved then ones that went further out as humanity migrated.

New England too.

Selective breeding.

Chinese have prioritized their best people to marry each other for thousands of years through arranged marriages, for the most cases. That "best" means, highly educated + highly cultured + rich. Highly educated comes from the fact that education for the rich was mandatory(by family decision and government incentives) for most of China's history. The more educated their sons/daughters are, the more likely they'll land government position or in positions of power. In China, intellect/merit. This is the country that created a very robust meritiocratic system and had tried very hard to eliminate loopholes around the system. Making exams anonymous, making exams requirement/passing rate dependent on knowledge of literature/governance/classics/martial arts/etc. The culture of valuing intellect influenced most of east Asian countries.

The same cannot be said of other countries. There weren't any system in place anywhere where intellect would rise up on top over brawn/pure familial connections. There weren't systems anywhere where pure meritiocratic system of choosing governors/government officials were in place. It wasn't until the late 18th-19th century did the British and the other europeans started adopting the Chinese civil exam route for pruning the skilled/educated from unskilled/uneducated.

Disingenious studies

so why aren't siberians on the moon by now

the white average isn't that high

so why didn't other societies do the same as china that long ago?

It's all about that silk road.

The Native American civilisations had difficulty developing because, unlike Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, China and India, they weren't linked through together along trade routes which allowed the rapid spread of technologies, plants, animals and ideas.

Thanks to this interconnectedness, most of the Old World had most of the same sorts of work animals available to them (oxen, horses, etc.), which led to the development of innovations such as the wheel (which current evidence suggests was invented in just one place and then spread from there over time). It also allowed gunpowder, invented in China (and used in devices such as fire lances), to spread to the Middle East and the Ottoman Empire (where it became very popular for cannons), and then into Europe (where the arquebus, the forefather of modern handheld firearms, was invented). Ironworking also spread across the world after the Bronze Age Collapse, revolutionising metallurgy technologies. Being cut off from this line of trade meant that the Native Americans never had a chance to be exposed to iron or gunpowder technologies and develop their own innovations before the Europeans showed up on their doorstep in the 1500s, clad in iron armor (effectively impenetrable to their copper or stone weapons) and wielding firearms (which were far easier to train people to use than bows or slings).

There are three that could have done the same thing. Greeks, Romans, and India.

>Greeks
They might have as they had the intellectual rigor needed. Plato was a strong supporter of the rule of law. Their chance was through the Macedonian empire, that shortly collapsed after Alexander. So they would never get the chance again.

>Roman
They had the power to do it. They had the rule of law too. What happened was power was divided between the senate and the Emperor. So there was always a division.

>India
They had the intellectual respect that monarchs supported. But due to the fractured nature of India, the power always changed and never was stable enough to build itself up proper.

>So why China?
Qin happened. Before Qin, there were 100 schools of thought. All various types of philosophy/way of life/governance/etc. When Qin rose to power, they strongly established legalism as the base form of governance. Legalism was absolute adherence to the rule of law and upholding the government in highest regard. It established ground works for the meritiocratic systems throughout most of China's dynasties. With the other dynasties seeing how effective meritiocratic system of governance and how effective legalism as a basis for governance, they essentially piled up from there. The cascading effect so to speak.

Hitler's poop and vomit.

Then why is there a gap between Japan and China but both countries have similar IQ?

>tfw superior chinese intellect paired with superior western cultural values
>tfw dad has PhD and makes 6 figures despite being born in some shitfuck village in China with literally no money
>tfw i shitpost on an anime forum mainly inhabited by white nationalists

Japan industrialized early after the American threat.

Then they got destroyed by America. And rebuilt again by America.

China was too large and their effectiveness was slowed by their sheer size(as well as the opium crisis). But mainly during WWII, China underwent a civil war. The winner was shutout from international politics/economy for ~20 years. Then Nixon gave China the key to the US economy and China took advantage of the capitalistic opportunity. Japan by the time was already developed. So China's now catching up.

>be basically 3rd world shithole country
>the average person here has the same IQ as the average American
Really makes me think!

I would also add that Mexico, one of the cradles of American civilization, was poor in iron ore, which is very unusual for most of the world. The verticality of the continent and narrowness of the land bridge between SA and NA was definitely a factor.

Mexico is ranked 14th most in terms of iron ore production.

Jewish orchestrated communism

>Britain
Some faggot g*rman probably made this

The main reason Japan was mad at the US is we we (and the brisitsh) were economical supporting the Chinese nationalists, disregarding the international norm of keeping China weak and divided, a norm that had been going on for 200 years

word

niggers
we have way more in europe than you have in your shitty communist country

I had no idea Australia was this stupid

Show academic verified sources.

That just sounds like complete BS, know how many cultures are in mainland China today? Hanzu are the most yes, but even then the word is very bendable. China was not monolithic in the past, this idea of one unified single China is very recent. Hanzu ethnic group has also absorbed a lot of past ethnic groups.