What the fuck was wrong with the Aztecs?

What the fuck was wrong with the Aztecs?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_in_the_Great_Temple
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicker_man
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitobashira
link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02342445
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_sex_characteristic
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050601#references
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I dunno, what the fuck was wrong with the Spanish?

> Using cultural fuckery to justify interference in the affairs of a foreign state.

They were pretty amusing tbqh

Omg look at the pic related, why wouldn't there be interference?? You are going off topic and making a new question for this thread

Nothing. They were trying to balance and order their world according to their worldview.

jesus, hispanics are just fucked genetically
aztec savages + spaniards (who are mixed between Arabs, Visigoths, Celts)

All of those people you mentioned are based.

>Moving the goalpost

What the fuck was wrong with the Europeans?

Incas were superior to europeans though.

Why is European culture so dark and obsessed with death?

arabs are fags

>spaniards (who are mixed between Arabs, Visigoths, Celts)
You forgot Romans, Iberians and maybe even Phoenicians.

Danse Macabre

They died from natural causes

People call Muslims/Middle easterners violent. South America, with or without Christianity is a the most violent shit hole on the planet. More so than Saharan Africa.

Pic related

>mfw the superior inca meme is real

>so dark and obsessed with death
Not any more than Mexicans.

It wasn't always violent there though. Prior to the civil war and escalating tensions of the mid 70s El Salvador was pretty safe. After the civil war gangs formed in the US apparently taking after the chicano ones and they were deported back to El Salvador where the problem was ignored by our corrupt government and the youths weren't reintegrated to society. Then by the mid 2000s the problem blew up in the face of everyone and now death squads have returned to

So Argentina really is white after all.
>Honduras, Guatemala, Salvador
Holy fuck hahaha

Argentina has always been white.

While morbid, that's just bones of normal corpses, not a result of mass sacrifices.

That's imported European culture. Santa Muerte comes from catholicism and even Day of the Dead has been greatly influenced by Christian holidays.

Absolute nonsense, it doesn't exist anywhere in Europe, it's just subhuman Mexicans incorporating their Mesoamerican death cult into Catholicism much like the Caribbean niggers did with voodoo.
>Nuestra Señora de la Santa Muerte (Spanish for Our Lady of the Holy Death) or, colloquially, Santa Muerte (Holy Death), is a female deity (or folk saint depending on school of thought) Mexican folk religion, venerated primarily in Mexico and the Southwestern United States.
>Though the origins of the worship of Our Lady of the Holy Death are subject to debate, it is most likely a syncretism between pre-Columbian Mesoamerican religion and Spanish culture. Mesoamerica had always maintained a certain reverence towards death, which manifested itself among the religious practices of ancient Mexico, including in the Aztec religion.
>The Vatican has condemned the cult of Santa Muerte in Mexico as blasphemous and satanic, calling it a "degeneration of religion".

Based Iceland

>the only countries in continental Europe that like asses are muslim and gypsy shitholes
Makes sense. Iceland is the only country I cannot explain.

>According to the Spanish the Aztecs sacrificed 10 000 children every year., yet only 42 sacrificed children have been found in the most important temple of the empire. 42 children in 200 years. On the same spot the Spanish massacred 8 000 unarmed nobles and their children in a couple of hours. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_in_the_Great_Temple

Asses are for grown-up men and people with high-sexual drive. Boobs are for manchildren and people with low sexual drive.

>Asses are for niggers and low IQ retard
Fixed.

I have 135 IQ and I like asses. Not that fat, but I like them.

>Santa Muerte comes from catholicism
Literally end yourself.

Are you a nigger?

I'm a mutt between spanish, coast and mountain amerindian and nigger.

My condolences, that sounds like an abominable mixture. Colombian or Ecuadorean?

It's not that bad, I lost my virginity on HS anyway.
I'm Spanish according to my ID card :)

Spanish citizenship you mean?

>I lost my virginity on HS anyway
What does that have to do with anything?

t. conquistador

Yep.
It's not a bad amixture tho :)

Uhm you do know that women with bigger hips and by extension ass are more equip for child bearing right? If we are actually going to be Veeky Forumstorians here like we should, instead of looking at modern culture and trends, Romans and Greeks prefered women with larger hips. There isn't even much evidence that men are instinctively attracted to breast outside of modern sensibilities and beauty standards. The main function of breasts has always been to feed babies and this occurs fine regardless of the size of the breasts. Otherwise, women would all have evolved to have very large breasts.
At most, the fact that human females always have visible breasts regardless of whether they are lactating could show some significance, bit it is likely secondary to hips and butts. One possibility in my opinion and a couple others is they evolved to simply show a person is likely female more easily and not male or as an "alternative ass" on the front considering they're round symmetric in n shape similar to butts. Makes some sense considering that humans are of the very few mammals that have sex face to face too, instead of only from the back.

this board was a mistake

Your birth was a mistake.

Hips =/= ass

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II
friendly reminder

War is okay. Capturing people by the thousands and sacrificing them to some moon god, or behading them because they didn't pay their monthly tribute to the narcos, is not okay.

>Capturing people by the thousands and sacrificing them to some moon god
Yeah, doing it for the god who told you to not kill is better.

>Pope Clement VII had given his support to the Kingdom of France in an attempt to alter the balance of power in the region, and free the Papacy from dependency, i.e. a growing weakness to "Imperial domination" by the Holy Roman Empire (and the Habsburg dynasty).
>The army of the Holy Roman Emperor defeated the French army in Italy, but funds were not available to pay the soldiers. The 34,000 Imperial troops mutinied and forced their commander, Charles III, Duke of Bourbon and Constable of France, to lead them towards Rome.
>After the brutal execution of some 1,000 defenders of the Papal capital and shrines, the pillage began. Churches and monasteries, as well as the palaces of prelates and cardinals, were looted and destroyed. Even pro-Imperial cardinals had to pay to save their properties from the rampaging soldiers. On 8 May, Cardinal Pompeo Colonna, a personal enemy of Clement VII, entered the city. He was followed by peasants from his fiefs, who had come to avenge the sacks they had suffered by Papal armies.
>The population of Rome dropped from some 55,000 before the attack, to 10,000. An estimated 6,000 to 12,000 people were murdered.
>Many Imperial soldiers also died in the following months (they remained in the city until February 1528) from diseases caused by the large number of unburied dead bodies in the city. The pillage only ended when, after eight months, the food ran out, there was no one left to ransom and plague appeared.

Hey, at least I'm the only one using historical facts and interpretations to make an argument here. There rest of them are just using modern society and "muh"degeneracy to make their argument.
Yes it does,It almost always follows that women who have a larger distribution of fat at their hips also a larger distribution at the butt as well. Otherwise, it kind of looks weird; just admit you are wrong. Breast worship is more of a product of more modern sexulization by porn and art.

>or behading them because they didn't pay their monthly tribute to the narcos
really makes you think
>Guzman's troops everywhere committed terrible depredations. The first province he marched through was Mechoacan, the inhabitants of which still possessed abundance of gold, though not of the finest quality, as it contained a considerable alloy of silver, for which reason Guzman compelled them to contribute a larger amount. Casonci, the principal cazique of the province, boldly refused to give him so great a quantity of gold as he demanded, wherefore Guzman ordered him to be tortured, by pouring hot oil over his feet; but as the unfortunate cazique, notwithstanding all the torments he endured, still remained firm to his purpose, he was ordered to be hung.
- The True History of the Conquest of New Spain by Bernal Diaz del Castillo, CXCVII

They were proto-American Imperialists

>A large amount of the red countries are races and ethnicities stereotyped as having women with large asses, likes blacks and latinos
>blue countries are mostly races infamous for having flat women, like whites and asians
Hmm..

All casual conjecture aside, I love me some thick ass. No, I'm not black nor do I have a low IQ.

What does what one finds sexually attractive have to do with IQ for fuck sakes?! That image has got to be the definition of correlation does not mean shit. If it happens to rain everytime I have an exam, but never when I don't, does that mean I control the whether. Who makes up this shit? Get over yourselves and stop trying to make up reasons why you must be superior to other people you've never met to get over your own insecurities.

Oops sorry I replied to the wrong person.
Meant to reply to

IQ is important, because civilized people fuck facing each other while animals fuck each other from behind like monkeys do, hence the exposure of tits and ass respectively.

>Those beginner-tier casualties
Step aside, white boy.

My entire family has never had a problem with maths and academic stuff. We all had mathematical "talent" on a certain degree.

All the brainlet whiteys I've beat intelectually have showed me the actual situation of the white man on the world.

There was one event long ago, I remember a white nerd who bullied latinos, was a fascist-wannabe and he tried to do the same with me (almost 3 years of difference). He always asked me about definitions and tried to look down on me, unfortunately he failed so hard and got ridiculed by my poker face and correct answer every time.

It's kind of funny knowing that he actually wasn't that bright; my ecuadorian friend got better grades than him without studying that much.

Asses are better.

fat distribution at the hips is not what helps with child birth

>Implying because a woman has a big ass men hit it from the back most the time.
What is groping during sex??(mainly sideways but also missionary).
Confirmed for virgin. Like it's indisputable user. You are a virgin and have no idea what you are talking about and it is all speculation for you. Just go away and continue to fap to porn with big breasted women you will never fuck anyway while you speculate how superior you and your race are because of it.
Good day and quit derailing the thread with pseudoscience based on your inexperience.

I like how this turned into a ass vs tits thread. To bring it on topic of the Aztecs, a reminder that they favored the ass too - pic related.

The Maya on the other hand favored tits.

>Archeologists discover the remains of "only" sacrificed 42 children hundreds of years later
>This means that only 42 children were sacrificed
LOL
There's nothing more pathetic than this meme of modern archeologists overturning eye-witness testimony because they find a few shards of pottery in a ditch.

>testimony>material proof
?

May point is it usually is accompanied by fat distribution. Fat definitely helps with padding anyway. Not just birth is important but also carrying a child to term.

Get over yourself anyway, all humans have sex face to face or from the back like I mentioned earlier. It's a hallmark of being human and there is little variance between races in this duality. That shitty "plot" (which btw has no context so you can hardly extrapolate anything to an entire country's preferences based on a group of people who happen to browse a site regularly but I don't expect you to be scientifically literate) shows nothing in way of variance of how these people will have sex even most of the time. It is all speculation by you. That and the fact you are a virgin who thinks there is only one novelty of big asses and that is to fuck from behind. Let's forget about groping during sex. Of course, because you have never had it.

Or..Or how about this novelty? It may be a revolutionary concept for autists on this site but how about the possiblity that men can like both on an actual woman?

It's almost like because we find one artifact that showed a people having sex a thought of way that it is how they always had it. Or even worse, that it is how most people preferred it.

I like both. But a woman with nice tits and no ass is more disappointing than a woman with small tits and a nice ass. Thicc is truly god tier though.

Jesus, I've been to Jamaica, I didn't realize what a shithole it was

Why is the man so small compared to the women btw? Lol
Did some of these men really want THICC women to the point where they were actually almost fat?

Nothing, they were more advanced than Galls(Ancestors of French nation). But Aztecs had bad luck: Spanish Conquistadors destroyed Aztec Empire.

>Escaped sex slave testifies that captors killed hundreds of people
>police dig up the basement and only find one body
>HURRR OBVIOUSLY WE SHOULD DISREGARD THE TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESS WHO IS THE ONLY REASON WE WENT DIGGING FOR BODIES IN THE FIRST PLACE CLEARLY THEY WERE LYING IT'S NOT LIKE MAYBE WE MIGHT HAVE BEEN DIGGING IN THE WRONG SPOT OR SOMETHING
The irony is I bet you uncritically believe allegations like
without any material evidence whatsoever.

>no proof=disregard testimony
Hehe try again.

Azteks were banished from mainland for centuries because of their sacrificial culture. Some Aztek prince was suppose to marry a Toltec princess, and instead they decided to flay her alive and turned up to the ceremony wearing her skin.

Their allies and enemies also did human sacrifice. In fact, that practice goes back pretty far in Mesoamerica.

Not to the extent the Azteks practiced it, and the Toltecs were horrified by it. The Maya sacrifices also often survived, since it was primarily for bloodletting.

The Toltecs were long gone by the time the Aztecs showed up. Toltec civilzation ended like in 11th century. Aztecs didn't show up until the 13th or 14th century.

The Toltecs exiled the Azteks. The Aztek dominations came after the collapse of the Toltecs yes.

Other Aztek fun fact worth mentioning is that they burnt their own literature long before the Spanish got there.

No the Aztecs or more specifically Mexica were Chichimec migrants and among the last of them to enter the valley of Mexico. They settled in Tenochtitlan their promised land after years of wandering as nomads. They later adopted Toltec culture since it was so highly regarded akin to a Germanic tribe copying Rome and claiming to be their successors. You're confusing Toltec with Tepanecs from Azcapotzcalco who kicked them out of Chapultepec.

The books they destroyed were of their predecessors ordered by Tlacaelel to rewrite their history once they became imperialists. It's also when they made Huitzilopochtli their Sun.

post erotic Inca pottery

Not for this thread. Better post erotic Mesoamerican art instead.

...

kek I've never seen this one

That's not Inca.

what do you mean?

It's Mochica or Moche. Both Andeans but Incas came afterwards.

>"Moche pottery is some of the most varied in the world. The use of mold technology is evident. This would have enabled the mass production of certain forms. But Moche ceramics vary widely in shape and theme, with most important social activities documented in pottery, including war, metalwork, weaving and sex."

>"Traditional north coast Peruvian ceramic art uses a limited palette, relying primarily on red and white; fineline painting, fully modeled clay, veristic figures, and stirrup spouts. Moche ceramics created between 150–800 AD epitomize this style. Moche pots have been found not just at major north coast archaeological sites, such as Huaca de la luna, Huaca del sol, and Sipan, but also at small villages and unrecorded burial sites as well."

When I asked fo Inca pottery I was referring to Andean pottery, my bad

Nothing wrong with a little human sacrifice to keep the gods and people happy.

Also, it's not like the Aztecs were the only ones with such practices.

Didn't Celts and Greeks do it too?

Very rarely, and it was generally disapproved of. A hangover from Mycenaean Greece.

Off the top of my head, I remember hearing about this relating to the Celts.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicker_man

A bit off the subject from Celts and Greeks, but Japs apparently had this thing going on in the human sacrifice department.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitobashira

Arab and visigoth genes are too tiny to be mentioned in their genetic base. Their main base is celt + iberian + basque

>Fat definitely helps with padding anyway. Not just birth is important but also carrying a child to term

No, what is attractive UNIVERSALLY is a 0.7 waist to hip ratio. You don't need a fat ass to get an easy birth, you need wide hips. So much fat on your woman while being pregnant as to maker her hips wider is actually really bad, due to 1) epigenetics and 2) ketosis, which also negatively affacts the childs brain.

There is a reason why the "boob" fraction have higehr IQs on average. It's not intelligent to go after women because they have stored too much fat in their rear end. It would be evolutionary much wiser to go after healthy slim women to be able to see the actual hip size.

Boobs on the other hand evolutionary came from the fact that we homo sapiens sapiens started to change from doggie style (animalistic) to missionary (many edvantages, like bonding, longer coitus etc). Which means, countries which prefer still ass are most likely more animalistic. The superior ones have evolved a taste for boobs.

That's what science says. I'm sorry if you now have to feel bad because you still favour a more primitive sexual characteristic.

1350

Homo sapiens have sex both ways and your theory is full of shit. Again you know nothing of sex if you think liking a big butt on girls means person also prefers sex doggy style, you virgin. That map you showed gives no proof of that either, idiot. All humans like to pair bond extensively, it's hallmark of being human. Boob preference has nothing to do with intelligence of one race over another outside your imagination of trying to make up reasons of superiority that don't exist. There wasn't even a,study done on it either to top it off, it's all just stupid speculation on /pol/tard's part.

Btw, No woman ever gets to a hip waist ratio of 0.7 naturally. It's "ideal" but impractical. Check to see the hip ratios of actual women as reference.
I never said "so much fat" to the point she is actually fat you dingus. I simply said women with wide hips also tend to have a "fat distribution"(women naturally have more uneven fat distribution than men due to estrogen you know this right?) such as the lower body stores fat way more than the upper body and abdomen. The latter of which is actually gross(and upper body too if you're talking about arms strictly, also puts you at risk for CVD)
link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02342445
Of course being too fat during pregnancy is bad! It also puts you at risk for dilated cardiomyopathy and gestational diabetes. I never said ideal is being fat. You're putting words in my mouth because you don't understand what I mean by fat distribution.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_sex_characteristic

> Bad due to Epigenetics
Never mind you have no idea what you're talking about and I don't think you know what Epigenetics is nor do you understand science. If you did you wouldn't have dared cited that plot from porn hub random data collection on USERS of THAT PARTICULAR SITE as a conclusion that men in those countries prefer anything:"Nonrepresentative sample"

>Btw, No woman ever gets to a hip waist ratio of 0.7 naturally. It's "ideal" but impractical.

Sorry mate, but I am a woman and 0.7 is absolutely normal and most women have it in a healthy weight. So stop acting as if you know shit. Pic related instead of your pic straight out of tumblr lmao.

>I simply said women with wide hips also tend to have a "fat distribution"
No. That's like saying blonde women tend to have long hair. Wide hips = bones. Fat ass = fat distribution. Those two are not linked, otherwise there would not be such a thing as a tight cap (due to wide hips and normal fat distribution).

>Never mind you have no idea what you're talking about
Sure, that's why there have ben epigenetic studies on for example the german people which due to war diets have born children with higher psychological problems and higher probability to get fat (store for bad times).

> If you did you wouldn't have dared cited that plot from porn hub random data collection on USERS of THAT PARTICULAR SITE
I'm not that user, you retard. That was literaly my first comment in this thread.

And just to make clear that it's not a bias: I've got wide 0.6 wth due to small waist, additionally aesthetically wide thighs and small-regular C-cups making me a typical pear. So I'm not arguing for my own sake - in contrast to you, which already has stated him favouring big butts.

>B-but I wasn't that retarded user I swear
Yet in that post you make that ridiculous claim that i already said does not hold(muh IQ and boob preference and sex face to face) with reasons backed by actual science. One of them being that "study" doesn't even use the scientific method so it is shit. And you didn't even post a source too boot. You're still an idiot and a /pol/tard at that.
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050601#references
I said women get close to 0.7 but few if any actually have that number.
I didn't say "tight caps" can't exist,user. I said wide hips "tend" to go with more lower body fat distribution.
I'm not arguing for my own sake, I'm arguing against unsubstantiated bias and racism that makes literally no sense based on the arguments you made with them.

>North Korea likes ass
>United States likes ass

Why do these two not get along again?

Btw I forgot to mention the hair reference was a major false equivilancy because unlike hair color and length, both fat distribution and hip size ARE DETERMINED BY ESTROGEN. But then again, I don't expect you to actually read the sources I post or anything. It's not like you're used to that seeing you barely post any youself besides pictures.

>>B-but I wasn't that retarded user I swear
Pic related you sperging butthunter.

>I said women get close to 0.7 but few if any actually have that number.
No, it's quite common, nearly all girls I know look like that. Which is obviously the most probable thing while being the middle of both extrems.

>I said wide hips "tend" to go with more lower body fat distribution.

It doesn't biologically. Your fat distribution isn't linked, although anecdotal evidance might suggest it due to often being visually linked on fat people.

>I'm arguing against unsubstantiated bias and racism
Race realism is a fact, and that distribution is somehow "saying". You might not like it but it'S widely known that noggers and south americans like big butts and cannot lie. There obviously is a genetic and therefore cultural reason for it. You might not like it, but I'm pretty sure objective studies (if ever allowed to take place in the current political climate) would prove such preferences so we would not need a porn side telling us that.

Yes, but the distribution of fat cells says nothing, due to the fact that fat cells usualy grow on the same body parts on women (thights, belly, ass). But you try to claim that the amount of fullness of those cells (fat cells expant and multiplivate) is linked to bone structure - which would mean your probability of getting fat is linked to it. Which isn't the case. Stop trying to sell half truths.

>south americans
No. We like medium and round butts. Niggers on Brazil like celulite obese asses.

>shit that never happened: the post