How were Africans so thoroughly able to colonize Europe and the new world...

How were Africans so thoroughly able to colonize Europe and the new world, but very few people were able to successfully colonize Africa, in that there are very few non Africans in Africa outside of South Africa.

We fear the black warrior.

Because no one wants to live in Africa

If by colonize you mean brought as slaves then yes they are very successful.
Why no whites in Africa?
Diseases.
That was also the reason why blacks were bought and bring to both Americas. As they were native to them and have some sort of resistance to most of them.

Out of Africa can't be compared to European colonization since the former was made by people presumably looking for land to live on, while the later was about extracting resources, and you need to precise what you mean by "successfully colonize".

Everytime other races tried to colonise Africa their women ran away for the BBC.

There are more people of at least partial African descent living outside of African than there is outsiders living in Africa, by a lot.

Because African and negroid are two separate things.

African leaders tricked Europeans into buying their criminals. At the time it was brilliant.

Bump

>All slaves were criminal

They weren't

Criminals, debtors, POWs.

The people in power can make anything criminal and proceed to mass incarcerate. It happens all the time.

>but very few people were able to successfully colonize Africa
Colonizing Africa was easy as shit though, it's just that few of the colonizers wanted to live there.

>Easy
It wasn't even possible until the 19th century. It has proved difficult for a variety of reasons.

Pretty much this.

Although, in colonial times, quite large numbers of (white) French and Portuguese citizens did live in their respective African colonies. Brits too, although they also brought in lots of Indians to East Africa.

When people mean criminal they mean like hardened ones like murderers or theives

We know. The last place a western army wants to fight in is Africa.

It would make Vietnam look like a game of laser tag at the fun center.

How would you know no hardened criminals needed up on ships bound to Americas. Have you ever lived around black Americans, or seen their stats. They kill for nothing.

>quite large numbers

It was a small % in the majority of cases barring cases like 20th century Portuguese Africa where poor people came in droves and heavily benefitted from provincial policy.

Tropical disease and shitty trade logistics.

ended up*

It didn't say they didn't exist but most cases they were low in number in the scale of the trade. Mist people claim that all the slaves were hardened criminals so that it's used as an adhic reasoning why Blacks are X thing just like slavery was used as a reason why blacks sucked at sports (the slaves that were caught were slow/couldn't escape capture) and then when they became good at it slavery was used as a reason why blacks did well (bred to be good at physical stuff).

Most black violence is robbery or turf wars, both of which are about poor people and money.

How would you know that? If you are a POW, you could very well have bodies on your belt, and are not a nice guy. Did good decent Africans get caught up, sure, but Africa has always been a basket case of sorts. If you ended up being locked up and sold off, apparently those in power didn't like you, in many cases their reasoning was probably legit, and they were trying to rid the menaces to their rule and society.

The wealthiest black communities are still more violent than the poorest white communities.

I remember that one funny event when one of Kang appear suddenly appear on some Portuguese colony with gigantic army and slaves and forced Portuguese to buy them for guns and then he use guns to conquer and get more slaves.

The poorest white communities are isolated rural places retard

Source?

If that's the case, then how did the Romans conquer Egypt?

I know what you are doing, but the Ptolemies had lots of Nubian mercenaries. And a Roman military expedition into Nubia failed when the Nubians turned them back.

So Romans DID fear the black warrior, as they literally ran away from them and never tried taking Nubia again.

>Romans
>white

>if poor blacks lived in the sticks it would be a peaceful utopia

The house on the left looks better than anything Africans have produced desu.

O'rly

>our mud huts are actually better!
fascinating post

What's a big difference between rural and urban areas?

population density for one

Niggers have historically accomplished next to nothing, not even civilization, not even domesticating zebras or crop rotation. They're equivalent to mental retards in terms of their average IQ. Nothing they've done is the result of anything other than white people and sand-niggers using them for their own ends. Otherwise they stay put and exemplify to the rest of the world that they are worth exterminating: over half the rape, robbery, and murder in the United States is their fault but they only make up 13 percent of the population, it happens to be equivalent to the rates of crime in the African continent. Niggers need to die, they're the retarded people.

The funny part is that all of those example, except the one in the middle, were made with white money and white management for white purposes. Niggers aren't exactly known for their great architects.

Can you prove that?

Those mud huts unironically are better than the stereotypical african mud hut. This one has windows, ceiling, a supporting roof beam, and is entrenched.

That's basic world history, all cities in Africa were founded by European colonists. Just look up the history of every major city, it's always British, French, Belgian, German or Italian companies. Governments didn't even exist in large swathes of Africa before 1914. They're collectively retarded.

>African leaders tricked Europeans into buying their criminals.
This is a very good point actually.
>get rid of your weakest, most dysgenic elements
>dumbfuck whites even pay you money for it
We got outsmarted by niggers, I gotta give it to them.

Nope

Chicago founded by a black man.

I don't think you appreciate the positives of slave labor enough.

even the Asians refused to take blacks in as slaves but the geniuses in Europe shipped them all over the world, whites and blacks are a curse upon mankind

There are almost none.
>depresses wages for the average joe
>low incentive for technological advancement
>when you free them you're suddenly left with millions of criminal, murderous niggers around you

Can you prove he was actually a nigger? No you can't, because that shit is made up.

The average joe can go fuck themselves. Slave labor was awesome and the only negative you can think is the result of people stupid enough to let them go and NOT exterminate them after using the only thing they're good for.

>The average joe can go fuck themselves.
>the only people who matter are niggers and some rich fuck who owns them
Sorry sweetie, not how it works.

This is the guy.

Look him up.

Its in Morocco, the old buildings are made by themselves, its the same culture as the Moorish Spain, and the modern ones are made post colonialism, then again they're Arabs and Berbers, not sub Saharans

What are you talking about? Asians (middle easterners) were trading niggers around before, during and after Europeans were making use of them. Asians still use slave-labor by niggers, so do Africans. Look it up faggot.

Explain how come American south was a catastrophic, impoverished, backwards Russia-tier shithole, while the north where nigger slaves didn't live was developed, industrialized and rich. Slave labor is shit and ineffective which is why today only nigger countries like Mauritania still have it.

You don't get to decide what matters, that's up to people like me.
It's made up for sympathy points.
>the modern ones are made post colonialism
exactly, niggers can't do shit

It would have been difficult considering a good number of them were the plantation owners children.

>Explain how come American south was a catastrophic, impoverished, backwards Russia-tier shithole
BECAUSE LINCOLN

>American south was a catastrophic, impoverished, backwards Russia-tier shithole
Actually it was fucking paradise. You have no knowledge of southern history do you?

> that's up to people like me
Niggers?

Moroccans are north Africans/middle easterners, not sub Saharan blacks

Morocco is in Africa. OP never specified niggers.

Not at all, race-mixing was highly frowned upon during most of American history. Jefferson was a degenerate.

I'm talking before the civil war you faggot.

Upper-crust white people.

I wasn't arguing that point.

Then how did Germanics sack Rome?

It was a literal cesspit full of subhumans.

If you hung out in the slave quarters all the time, yes.

>Cletus McTrayvon Watermelonius III roleplaying as upper class
Amuse me some more.

the south literally had no economy outside of cotton and no industry. it was entirely dependent on england and france being friendly to them. it was so shit it could barely produce guns for the war the fire eaters brought upon themselves

Then you're point that Africans can't build anything is mutt, since north Africa is home to many advanced civilisations, it would be correct if you exclude it

It was extremely common. The proof is in modern black American DNA. It was frowned upon by white wives which is why the one drop rule, and inheriting the mothers status were put into place. To cut illegitimate mulatto children out of inheritance.

No, it was shit. A single day distance in the north would take you three full days in the south because the road and railroad network was such utter shit and the region produced absolutely nothing other than some shit plants even a nigger could pick. Disregard guns and it's basically a medieval environment.

>the south literally had no economy
That was intentional, the upper-class looked down upon making money for money's sake, honor was the chief virtue. And the south wasn't dependent on England or France post-American Revolution, that's stupid. The south was self-sufficient and it worked, the north fucked that up because they were miserable puritan bastards who hated all the Irish and Italians they let in, so they went to war to make everybodyt miserable. Antebellum South was a wonderful place where you didn't even need a hotel because even a total stranger was welcome in a plantation.

so the nullification crisis after the tariff of abominations was just some cheeky banter in between sips of ice tea and defending maidens?

>north Africa is home to many advanced civilisations
Sand-niggers who fuck goats? We fucking wrecked their asses in 732 and they fucked back off to their sand-pits. They're coming back though.
>the road and railroad network was such utter shit
Being on coach and horse is much more pleasant than a train-ride.

Not counting the Muslims; Carthage, Egypt, Phoenicians, etc

>being behind a horse's ass on a bumpy dirt road while at the mercy of the weather is much more fun than being inside a mechanical marvel with room to walk around, an entire dining section, and legit beds to sleep in that travels at over 10x the speed of the fucking horse

and Swahili trading networks
and Mali
and other gold kingdoms
and Zimbabwe
and the Congo

Every single one of those was conquered by white people at one point or another.

Romans and Greeks aren't white

and it wasn't accepted back then user.

>It was frowned upon by white wives which is why the one drop rule, and inheriting the mothers status were put into place

That's not why One-drop rule was implemented you fuck. It was for legal purposes when it was implemented by law in the 20th century. Why the fuck do people say it was always a thing?.

>Moving the goalpost
They also conquer ''white people'' at one point or another

You know this guys just fucking with you guys with the classic "shift the goalposts" routine?

It was common. The proof is in black American genetics. Whether or not it was frowned upon is another discussion entirely.

>north: corn, wheat, coal, steel, iron, trains, military technology, farming technology
>south: cotton, tobacco and niggers
Gee nigger I wonder which part of the country was more economically developed.

>Far more Northerners than Southerners belonged to the Whig/Republican political party and they were far more likely to have careers in business, medicine, or education. In fact, an engineer was six times as likely to be from the North as from the South. Northern children were slightly more prone to attend school than Southern children.
South
View of the South
In contrast to the factory, the plantation was a central feature of Southern life. (Library of Congress)

The fertile soil and warm climate of the South made it ideal for large-scale farms and crops like tobacco and cotton. Because agriculture was so profitable few Southerners saw a need for industrial development. Eighty percent of the labor force worked on the farm. Although two-thirds of Southerners owned no slaves at all, by 1860 the South's "peculiar institution" was inextricably tied to the region's economy and culture. In fact, there were almost as many blacks - but slaves and free - in the South as there were whites (4 million blacks and 5.5 million whites). There were no large cities aside from New Orleans, and most of the ones that did exist were located on rivers and coasts as shipping ports to send agricultural produce to European or Northern destinations.

>Only 35% of the nation's train tracks were located in the South. Also, in 1860, the South's agricultural economy was beginning to stall while the Northern manufacturers were experiencing a boom.
>Far more Northerners than Southerners belonged to the Whig/Republican political party and they were far more likely to have careers in business, medicine, or education. In fact, an engineer was six times as likely to be from the North as from the South.

I never doubted it was uncommon user.

>conquer white people
>uses a picture of Egyptians who got conquered by Greeks

but Greeks aren't white

Lmao, Incas were superior to those backstabbing europeans.

Malaria line.
Perfectly dividing southern slave states from northern ones.
Its pretty hard to not switch to slave labor when
a)slaves are available and somewhat resistant to it
b)indenture white servants die a lot(fresh from Europe 1/3 die in first year if they land in South)

White bois die like droves when bitten by smol flies.

t. Babu Goldstein

>Malaria line goes through the Pennsylvania-Virginia border
Are you being ironically or unironically retarded?

Because that worked out so well for somalians

Sahara Desert

He's kinda right though. The (kind of true) idea that only africans were able to do hard labor in the brutal environment of the south is what motivated Chatel African slavery.

white man work ethic btfo

You know that UK have serious problem with malaria and other funny stuff at the time?
Not even mentioning whole south Europe.

ITT: LARPers