So, let's assume that race realism is undeniable scientific fact. Jews and Asians are at the top of the intellectual pyramid, Whites in the middle, Brown people at the bottom. What then? What, according to you, should be the next step(if indeed we should incorporate this fact into policy at all)?
So, let's assume that race realism is undeniable scientific fact...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Why do white people have to resort to dredging up psychometric testing as a justification for their desire to keep their homelands homogeneous anyway? People don't really care for diversity and multiculturalism that should be respected in of itself. Full stop. "Race realism" is ultimately a distraction.
Fuck off. This is a board for discussing history, not psuedo science. Even the ramifications of this retarded theory being true hypothetically are political, so take it to /pol.
>sefaradis and ashkenazis are the same
>japanese and indonesians are the same
>white is a race
>brown is a race
>latinos, indians and arabs in the same group as subsaharan
I want blainlets to fuck off my board.
Well logically speaking we should either genocide everyone below the jews, make the jews the ruling class and organise society into tiers with them at the top and the browns at the bottom, or just ignore this.
Unless of course you can think of some contrived reason why your race is the perfect one and everybody else is either too stupid or too evil.
>"Race realism" is ultimately a distraction.
This. At best it's autism and at worst it's a false flag designed undermine any kind of nationalism by equating it with HITLERâ„¢
"race realism" is a fucking retarded fad
What's the actual policy you are suggesting? I actually agree that it is scientific fact that different populations can have different IQs due to genetics, just like many other genetic traits vary between populations. However it has been consistently shown that variations between individuals are greater than variations between populations and I'm not sure what the policy suggestions are since it makes sense for all humans to have similar rights and for everyone to be treated as an individual.
Also different human populations invariably intermingle with each other every time they come into contact so trying to classify people into specific races seems silly.
dismantle affirmative action and quotas
I agree. I blame American cuckporn fantasies for it.
How are the social aspects of heredity a fad?
let's assume for a moment race realism is fact.
But, even if same races were intellectually inferiour, there are still some smart blacks around, like Barack Obama.
Thus, through sexual selection, this smart blacks will reproduce more than average dumb blacks, and within one or two generations, black IQ will reach the average level of whites or Asians
Hate to break this to you, but in modern society it's the stupidest people who have the most children.
If it is true, then I guess the entire education system would have to be changed in order to help people from ethnic backgrounds with lower average IQs.
I'm not interested in the subject of IQ so I know little about it. But I do wonder about the truth in it, and are people really limited in life by this metric?
And there all tall chinamen like Yao Ming, so their stock being manlets doesn't matter at all.
Furthermore, there is regression to the mean where outliers will reproduce towards the biological means. This is why short people have taller kids. The same is true cognitively with brainlets.
For America it's irrelevant, for Europe the conclusion is to stop the ongoing immigration from low-IQ regions.
>through sexual selection, this smart blacks will reproduce more than average dumb blacks
I agree that "race realism" is retarded but so is this statement. Smart people are always less likely to reproduce than idiots because they're too busy working or having existential crises to find a mate whereas retards just wanna bang.
You mean like guys with IQ of 80? I am pretty sure these people rarely reproduce, since women aren't especially attracted to retards who can't even provide for themselves, let alone a familiy
>Thus, through sexual selection, this smart blacks will reproduce more than average dumb blacks
AAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!
that's exactly why they copulate more-less planning involved.
we are not talking about the smarters people, we are talking about the people whose IQ has the highest evolutionary fitness, which should be a bit more than 100, since the average IQ is constantly rising
Except women with 80 IQs are attracted to them and don't need the partner to provide as the state does it for them.
>I'm not interested in the subject of IQ so I know little about it. But I do wonder about the truth in it, and are people really limited in life by this metric?
It's complicated. You can be very successful even if you have mediocre IQ, but intelligent people are more likely to be successful overall. Shit, skilled bluecollar workers and craftsmen make quite a lot of money and that doesn't take much intelligence, just dedication.
can't copulate if you can't attract a partner
chinese are getting taller
women in general are attracted to men with high status, and people with an IQ of 80 will have a hard time reaching high status in modern society
The average IQ is rising because of the improvements in nutrition and education. We're actually starting to see that trend reverse.
The earth is flat
Regardless, "average dumb blacks" will reproduce more than the smart ones and this is true for all races.
You don't have to be smart to lie to someone even stupider than you, and then have unprotected sex.
People who have more wealth can afford a reproduction strategy that involves putting lot's of resources into fewer kids who now have a greater chance for success. This is in contrast to those without the resources to invest in their offspring who thus produce statistically more progeny so some might find success through sheer statistical mass. We find the same in nature, with creatures such as insects that do not put many resources into their children laying thousands of eggs while mammals, which tend to put time and resources into child rearing, have much fewer. Smart/Rich/"White" people are not "failing to breed", they are pursuing a more efficient reproduction strategy with a higher and thus more prohibitive buy-in cost.
if "average dumb black" can't reach the same social status as the "slightly smarter black", then he wont reproduce more
but there are less stupid women than stupid men, since the IQ regression of women is smaller
>Dividing races between jews, asians, whites, browns and what I'm assuming is black people
Why not ask a zoologist if black or flying animals are faster. If you had an ounce of understanding of the subject you'd divide them proper.
Social status means street cred- illiterate can be gangsters and women are into bad boys.
well, then maybe USA should stop beeing a third world country were organized crime provides the best job opportunities for poor people
Even white collar blacks are more criminal than their white counterparts.
That's true, but if you think that most of the women knocking out kids on welfare / benefits are getting knocked up by some roving band of millionaires with 140 IQs then you are very much mistaken. High status is very much relative to your social class.
Next step should be researching IQ and other intelligence differences so we can work to close the gap. I'd be happy to bring other races up to the intelligence levels of whites and Asians, we'd all be able to get along that much better, and also advance enough to get off this rock.
>getting knocked up by some roving band of millionaires with 140 IQs
I don't know why but that mental image is incredibly funny.
i thought this thread was about intelligence among races?