Were the Nazis seen as evil because they did everything Britain had done the past 200 years in only 6?

Were the Nazis seen as evil because they did everything Britain had done the past 200 years in only 6?

>Concentration camps
Check, taken from the Brits in the Boer Wars
>Military extermination of a race of peoples deemed lesser, slaughter and torture of civilians and murder of their children
Check, Britain's foreign policy with Ireland
>Betray and backstab an ally
Check, only the Krauts didn't get away with it like the British do
>Invade a neutral land, kill it's inhabitants and claim it as clay to your war machine
Check, too many instances to count from the Brits

Real question is, does this make Britain the enemy in history for essentially being Nazis throughout it, or does this make Germany the enemy in history for managing to wrap up all of Britain's "accomplishments" in just 6 years?
I mean, both are obviously villains, but who was worse?

The correct answer is that Br*tain and G*rmany are both evil, irredeemable nations whose populations should be exterminated. Vive la France!

The eternal Anglo has pretty much managed to fabricate history.

This looks a lot like the "shitler" poster.

Germany killed Jews who were regarded as a highly civilized people for being scientifically, culturally and technologically far more advanced than most other ethnic groups in the world at that time.

The UK primarily killed niggers, chinks, pooinloos and white trash (Boers, Irish and Americans).

Celts have proven bigger brains, higher IQs and earn more per capita than the Eternal Anglo

>Jesus.

The delusion it's strong with this one.

I thought concentration camps were inspired by indian reservations in the US.

Niggers and chinks are not subhuman though

Indian reservation is not a concentration camp

Doesn't matter because west coast USA was interment (concentration) camps for ethnic Japanese.

That was after the Boer War where the British invented concentration camps and their prized pupil Adolf took note.
Also interment camps are different.

>Were the Nazis seen as evil because they did everything Britain had done the past 200 years in only 6?

Let's dispense with all slave morality in your question for a moment and replace it with master morality.

The Third Reich expanded in Europe with the goal of creating an ethno-empire. In the process, they caused EXTREME DIPLOMATIC INSTABILITY. This is key to understanding the perception of Nazi evil.

In contrast, the British Empire, yes did all the things that you listed, generally without other countries caring.

The key is the outrage of DIPLOMATS and other statesmen. The Third Reich also had a different class of targets generally - other complex 20th century nation-states. Destroying other institutions with soft power is always going to raise someone's consternation. If right now, I dropped a nuke on Japan, people are going to be far more angrier than if I dropped a nuke on Moldova.

DIPLOMATIC INSTABILITY

In principle, the Nazis did nothing wrong, but they pissed off realpolitik statesmen don't care about principles.

>the Nazis did nothing wrong
There, you could have just said you were from /pol/.

SHUT IT DOWN THE KRAUTS KNOW

lmao

This so much the g*rmans only killed the 6000000 because they were so envious of their grand accomplishments.

Look at german contribution to the world and see how many names were Jewish.

>managing to wrap up all of Britain's "accomplishments"

Problem is they only wrapped up Britain's evil accomplishments without the redeeming qualities.

And even then they went far beyond what Britain ever did.

...

This is savings, not GDP per Capita. Italians aren't richer then Germans and Ukraine may be poor, but not THAT poor.

they also invaded Afghanistan and caused the suffering of millions of people there fucking anglo subhumans

No mention of his Jewish atheism though

I hope you can distinguish between American internment camps, British concentration camps, German concentration/work camps and German extermination camps used in industrial-level genocide. But based on your post, you probably can't.

Genocides commited by Brits happend as a side effect of their greed/political goals
They never actually mass killed entire peoples out of pure ideology, like nazis did

Is real estate serving as primary residence included?
Is debt subtracted?
Is PPP adjustment made?

>they did everything Britain had done the past 200 years in only 6?
It's because in Germans, the Anglo-Saxon blood isn't diluted with Celtic blood.

Nazis were evil for the same reason the Spartans were: They did to other Europeans what was normally done by Europeans to non-Europeans.

The Brits, Americans and Russians were 10 times worse, that's why they liked each other so much.

Germany was like a nerd who one day decided to toughen up and be a part of the cool kids and for that he beat up some smaller kids, but the cool kids just laughed and said to him to stop faking it and being someone he wasn't. Then he went apeship and punches as many cool kids as possible until they wrestled him to the ground.

>They did to other Europeans what was normally done by Europeans to non-Europeans
Not really no. British rule was actually extremely lenient in comparison to how barbaric the Nazi's were.

>Not really no. British rule was actually extremely lenient in comparison to how barbaric the Nazi's were.

Is that why the 13 colonies wanted to break free from the Anglos?

There's no crime against the white race attributed to Jews that the Eternal Anglo hasn't committed a thousand times worse.

>being taxed without being represented is the same as being gassed, shot, starved and worked to death en masse