HOLY SHIT

Have two countries been more bitter rivals?

Why couldn't they just get along?

They stole our land and rejected our claim to their throne.

>Oui oui, get off muh land.
>Doesn't get off land for 300 years

It wasn't "their" land. We had a claim to it and their throne.

But this doesn't explain the rivalry after the hundred years war

Perhaps they were >tfw too intelligent
to be friends

Daily reminder that Napoleon was the first Hitler.

Frogs are barely better than Jerry.

I like your channel

They would never have been able to fully hold the other save for a short period in the early 1200's. Even then, the two were making the smartest plays by farming each other for XP. By the Renaissance and Age of Sail, it was over for the rest of their competitors.

>Have two countries been more bitter rivals?
Of course however France and the UK are special in that neither one ever vanquished the other.

Now they are both being taken over by niggers and muslims.

Why would they get along? France was the reigning military and cultural power on the continent for a long time, and was the only one who could really threaten or challenge English domination of the seas or colonies. Napoleon conquering continental Europe was much more dangerous to England than the Spanish Armada

...

US is not the UK's "oldest son"

Bermuda and Canada are older, and that's just outside of Europe.

This. But it's important to remember such petty sectarian matters are beneath us now. We serve a high purpose as Anglo-Americans.

China and Mongolia.

Not every steppeshit that threatened China was a Mongol.

Sweden and Denmark

Denmark-Sweden was just as bitter desu

...

If those fucking Bulgar savages would have just stopped their dick wanging the result wouldn't be this. I blame them for the fall of Constantinople.

>result: ottoman rule on the Balkans

My fucking sides