Why do subhuman anti white Leftists want to make Veeky Forums their safespace?

Why do subhuman anti white Leftists want to make Veeky Forums their safespace?

how many buzzwords can you fit in one post?

The fuck you on about nigga?

They can't be buzzwords if it's true

Keep your hatespeech off of this board.

*truthspeech

Actually they can.

*alternativefactspeech

Fuck off

>physically weak men more likely to be socialists

That's strange because I am not that super fit physically and I think socialism is retarded.

??? Why do you care? Even if you were right, which you are not, this board is filled with a huge range with fringe on both sides. Mostly centrists. Pretty broad spectrum if you ask me?

>Who are you shilling for faggot?

>more likely
It's talking about a general tendency, not something that's true of every single individual. It deserves to be questioned (since OP neglected to link to the study), but finding a single exception to it isn't a coherent argument against it.

Veeky Forums is not /pol/ with dates

It's likely a result of their penchant for reading books instead of lifting weights.

>Study: The lower your IQ, the more right-wing you are

>physically weak men more likely to be socialists

That makes sense because socialist countries have a habit of starving their citizens

>this is what anti white SJWs actually believe

If socialism is anti-white, how come there are so many white socialists?

I mean, I'm not some limp wristed scrawny person but I am not super physically fit either. It doesn't matter but I would like to see where OP got that link from.

>people who have multiple websites and an entire board to themselves, crying about safe spaces

Pottery.

Didn't we do this thread yesterday?

What area of history or humanities are you asking about?

Your talking about leftypol, revleft, Tumblr, reddit, and Facebook right?

It's got to be autism. Even then though, some autists aren't even that blatant about it.

All Leftists are self hating cucks

why are you samefagging?

People are just cucks in general. The right bends over all the time for the rich.

then why did your queen Bernie sanders take all that money from you?

What are you taking about? I didn't post at . I was just responding to that user.

Nowadays many self-claiming "Leftists" in western world are actually not quite left if by traditional definitions. Most "leftists" we see today are just a bunch of pampered, degenerated, drug-abused, genders-fluid liberal perverts who propagate their regressive perversion in the disguise of left leaning ideologies, they're no batter than those people they hate such as Neo Nazi and Alt-Right. Different sides on a same coin.

Come again?

Yes, we are doing the same thread again aren't we?

Stormfront, Blood and Honor, Radio blah blah blah

Ree not all those are explicitly nazi, only nazi-lite blah blah blah

Nice ms paint editing
Why do anti white SJWs think this is your safespace?

How does people not hating their own race make them nazis?

Yes yes, very good. The next stage is to greentext quote people and respond with "adorable", right?

Wow, the anti white cuck isn't even denying that that "he" doesn't even hate white people

>doesn't even hate white people

You have a problem with me not hating white people?

Yes, i hate cucks

>not hating white people makes you a cuck

You heard it here first folks!

That's deflection at best. And I mean, people donated to his campaign because they wanted him to win, I'm not sure what the issue is. That's how politics works.

I can definitely understand how classical leftists would take issue with the modern left focusing more on idpol at the expense of the class struggle, but I think it's definitely a stretch to claim that "there are more than two genders" is just as bad as "we should remove all non-white people from the country and become slaves to traditional values".

What exactly makes you think they consider it a safe space? I mean kind of the main criticism of the whole idea of "safe spaces" is that they exclude ideas that they disagree with, but that doesn't really happen here, you don't get kicked off the board for having right-wing ideas here. You may get kicked out for /pol/-style shitposting, but that's because Veeky Forums is supposed to be more serious and intellectual, not a memey circlejerk like /pol/. You're free to advocate the same ideas here as you do on /pol/, as long as you do it in an adult manner. Posting le happy merchant may constitute an argument on /pol/, but the credibility standard is a bit higher here.

>How does people not hating their own race make them nazis?
Nobody's saying that though. The Nazis are the one who think that only their own race deserves rights. Thinking other races deserve the same rights as your own race does not entail hating your race. Your problem, essentially, is that you're mad that the world doesn't conform to your ideals, and you perceive that as an attack on your identity. Unfortunately, since there are even people of your own race who disagree with you, you can't turn the world into your ideals without becoming a totalitarian and deciding that other people don't deserve to have rights.

>the anti white cuck calling someone else totalitarian
Hilarious

You leftypol shills want to ban all discussions thats not approved by you

I thought the script said you need to say "adorable" there?

...

...

Just look at the raid threads on leftypol and revleft

I think it's because they know the mods are on their side.

I miss /fitlit/

>walk into a gym, everybodies reading books.
>walk into a library, everyone is lifting weights.

(not pictured: the workers)

...

What views would I need to have to not be regarded as "anti-white"? I don't believe I've even said anything that could be reasonably construed to indicate a belief that whites should be given anything less than fair treatment. Is merely not granting white people unfairly positive treatment enough to constitute being "anti-white"?

And I'm sure the far-right wants to ban "degeneracy". But I'm willing to respect that the standard of discussion in Veeky Forums is defined by freedom of speech and an expectation of mature discourse. I accept that people who disagree with me have a right to voice their views, though I will choose not to engage with them if they do not conduct themselves in good faith.

OI see far more anti-left threads than any pro-socialism threads.

Actually, when was the last time there actually was a leftism thread? I can't remember. Maybe we should have a Marxism thread, just for debates sake, though I'd imagine there would be too many helicopter posting and no real discussion or friendly debate.

You SJWs don't deserve friendly debate

>"there are more than two genders" is just as bad as"we should remove all non-white people from the country and become slaves to traditional values".

More like "Brainwashing humanity with lgbt degeneracy and fluid genders lunacy" is just as bad as "we should remove all non-white people from the country and become slaves to traditional values". Actually a bit worse.
Neo-Nazi harm non-whites, but your libercuck bullshit harm entire humanity.

>hatespeech

I'm not partisan or anything, but seriously, fuck off with this neologism. Even the supreme court just said there's no such thing as fucking hate speech.

There's no "brainwashing" involved. People are just saying something that you disagree with, and you're getting triggered by the fact that some people agree with it. Since the only argument presented in support of the claim that belief in more than two genders is harmful is "muh degeneracy", it seems your position is pretty flimsy. Whereas the criticism of the far-right position is based largely on the notion of individual freedoms, which is something that many people consider important.

You leftists are against freedom, you don't habe any basis in reality

>tfw /hisfitlit/

You're against freedom if you think people identifying outside of the gender binary should be prevented. And the argument isn't even about "reality", though I have yet to see any "reality-based" evidence of how belief in non-binary genders will lead to harm.

They thing virtue signalling will help them getting pussy.

Psst, it's called /pol/

>There's no "brainwashing" involved
this is what SJWs ACTUALLY believe

>I have yet to see any "reality-based" evidence of how belief in non-binary genders will lead to harm.
because you SJWs live inside an an echo-chamber

Hardly a fair example, it's not like he had a choice.

>be socialist or dead.

>Okay.

>this is what SJWs ACTUALLY believe
Please explain how people being exposed to ideas you don't like constitutes brainwashing.

>because you SJWs live inside an an echo-chamber
I've been exposed to ideas from the "other side", but most of them seem pretty ridiculous. The main one as I've mentioned is basically "muh degeneracy", essentially the reactionary notion that "traditional values" are the one and only way to run a stable society, and none of the arguments in favor of that belief have seemed particularly coherent. It ends up basically sounding like "how DARE people be different from me!" Again, if you honestly believe that it will cause harm, I'd like to see you actually explain why you think so.

Not him, but I recall that when the Soviet Union formed nations Unironically feared the soviet warrior.

What ever happened to "better dead than red"?

Reminder that this is what OP (Frank) looks like. Is anyone the least bit surprised?

i figured he'd be a trap t b h

>I'd like to see you actually explain why you think so.

>There's no "brainwashing" involved
It's already been make into laws and textbooks for school kids, even propagated into mass media such as movies,cartoons and video games. You fucking out of touch dim-wit shithead! Keep burying your head in the sand! Your reaction really proves you're as bad as (((them))).

>anime posting

newfag

If you're not even going to try to defend your points, I see no reason why I should accept them as truth. Sure, there's always a possibility that I'll freak out and call you a racist Nazi, as I'm sure you believe left-leaning people have a tendency to do. But if you're not even going to try, then you basically have no chance of your points being considered legitimate.

>It's already been make into laws and textbooks for school kids, even propagated into mass media such as movies,cartoons and video games.
And those very same things have pushed straight relationships for far longer. And even today, straight relationships dominate the law and media. You're basically admitting that the powers that be have been brainwashing people into being straight for centuries, and still are today. How does that make you feel? You're basically arguing that any minority representation is a form of brainwashing.