Why didn't Slavs expand into Scandinavia?

It isn't. They have the same root, actually.

No, they don't.

Now that's a meme.

Can you cite a single source for this?

Or even explain how you can get sclavus from inclavare?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavs_(ethnonym)

>Commonly thought to derive from Proto-Slavic *slovo (“word”), thus meaning "those who speak meaningfully" and contrasting with *němьcь (“foreigner”, literally “dumb/mute person”). However, that word is an s-stem and thus the inflectional stem of that word is *sloves-, so it cannot be the direct origin as it would lead to an expected form *slovesěni (compare Russian cлoвécнocть (slovésnostʹ)). Thus the most likely origin is the verb *sluti (“to be known”).[1] Both words ultimately derive from Proto-Indo-European *ḱlew- (“fame”).
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Slav
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language

Just because East Slavs were sold as Slaves by Muslim people doesn't mean Slavs come from Slave. In fact, Slavs started calling themselves "Slav" where they defeated Germanics, Huns and other various tribes of people. Hence names like "Slavomir" meaning Famous in the World.

Slav - famous/glorious
mir - world

Right, but the etymology of Slav isn't being contested here, and even the page you linked to says that the word slave derives from it.

>where they defeated Germanics, Huns and other various tribes of people

WRONG

How so? When Slavs flooded Europe with mass of their people nothing stood in their way up until Franks decided to raid Samo's Empire and that opened up the gate for Nomadic Magyars.

Germanics like Goths and Vandals were denominated to serfs for West Slavs. "Gocie" "Goci" meant "serf" in Proto West-Slavic, especially Polish.
Ah, right. Probably due to Byzantines not being so fond of South Slavs.

>denominated
Meant "marginalized" but whatever.

But they were white warriors

>The English term slave derives from the ethnonym Slav. In medieval wars many Slavs were captured and enslaved, which led to the word "slav" becoming synonym to "enslaved person".[13][14][15][16]
>sources are online dictionaries without sources
>reasoning behind therm is that
>in medieval times slavs get btfo
>literally gives 1250-1300 date
So, befoe that they didn't have words for slaves? Or maybe they used latin words
Hm, I wonder.
Also, in which wars slavs were so hard defeated in those years? I all know, that Germans got heavy BTFO by them.

>in which wars slavs were so hard defeated in those years?
The whole "slav=slave" comes from Nomadic Khazars and Vikins enslaving Eastern Slavs and selling them to other folk, even in Persia.

Also, from Greek hatred towards: Croats, Serbs, Bulgarians etc.

It's funny how niggers and Slavs display the exact same behaviour

>Also, in which wars slavs were so hard defeated in those years?
For example
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kleidion

It's funny how niggers and Germanics display the exact same behaviour

It's funny how niggers and monkeys display the exact same behaviour

Niggers didn't conquer and dominate the whole world, Pavel. And now back to work, slav(e).

No, you go back to work, autistic serf >Niggers didn't conquer and dominate the whole world, Pavel.
Neither did the Germanics.

Brits are more Celtic than Germanic, though.

>be Germanic Nordic masterrace
>invent the cheese-slicer

>be Slavic Subhuman Slave
>contribute vastly to overall science and progress

really fires my neurons

>No, you go back to work, autistic serf

WE-tier, literally.

Sure, this is why they either language is almost entirely composed out of either Germanic or Greek/Latin terms.

On the topic of slaves

The Finnish word for slave, orja comes from Iranian Arya

>WE-tier, literally.
Look at your previous post again and then cry about "WE-tier".

English is a Germanic language with French vocabulary, but you probably didn't know that.

>Sure, this is why they either language is almost entirely composed out of either Germanic or Greek/Latin terms.

Correct, language determines your genes.

You're right. It were Germanics that conquered Europe, and Germanic-Celtic mongrels that rule the world.

>It were Germanics that conquered Europe
Now you gonna claim that the French or Romans were Germanic?

Get a life, burger.

Germanics themselves are mongrels. On top of that, they're mongoloids with african admixture.

Germanics being some kind of masterrace is an outdated sick and laughable meme in the light of modern science and genetic research.

The Franks (Latin: Franci or gens Francorum) were a collection of Germanic peoples that originated in the lands between the Lower and Middle Rhine in the 3rd century AD and eventually formed a large empire dominating much of western and central Europe during the Middle Ages. The Frankish Empire ultimately led to the birth of modern France and Germany and thus the Franks are seen as the forebears of the French and German peoples (in addition to Austrians and some other European nations)

Franks originated in Pannonia(most likely Hallstatt culture) and are genetic ancestors of modern-day French people.

Them being pure germanic variurs of Thyr 14/88 heil is outdated.

According to Y-chromosome studies the African contribution to the French gene pool is massive.
We can forget about Pannonian Franks, they are long gone by now.

>African contribution to the French gene pool is massive.
Except it's not.

Germans are more African than French. Which is ironic.

Teutonboos should just accept how much of a mongrel Germanics truly are.

I never really understood it, reading German history makes it seem like a bunch of autists trying to become a great civilization like Rome and failing most of the time. I don't hate the Germans but all this cocksucking for them is pathetic, its almost worse than BBC cuckposting.

ITT: Slavs and that one French dude against the academia of the world

I especially like how Russia was founded by Swedes.

>against the academia of the world
Except it was academic sources that proved Stay mad Teutoneger.

That's not academia, that's random pseudo-science.

It was actually Jacques the wizard that created the Germanic peoples.

Did the facts hurt your feelings, little shit?

Those are literal sources, not some /pol/tier images:
eurogenes.blogspot.com/2014/10/ancient-genomes-from-great-hungarian.html
bga101.blogspot.com/2013/10/eurogenes-k15-now-at-gedmatch.html
eupedia.com/forum/threads/25163-Y-DNA-haplogroups-of-ancient-civilizations/page3?styleid=41

You fucking germanicshits are as dumb as a stick with shit on it.

Veeky Forums is missing on that list, so I'm not giving it any credit.

(also you should probably seek help)

>eurogenes
>blogspot
lel

R1b is the most common Y-DNA haplogroup in France, as well as the rest of Western Europe. Your "Frankish" individual from Pannonia had haplotype J2, a Near Eastern haplotype that barely shows up north of Italy or the Balkans.

So I guess your Franks got cucked by their Romano-Celtic peasants, just like the rest of the Germanic migrants coming in from the east.

>provide respected sources among people that actually know their shit
>N-NEEEEEIN IT CAN'T BE XD
Last (you) from me for today.

Just FYI and ignoring the French autist

R1b-M269 is thought to have migrated west either through Pannonia/Hungary or north of Slovakia about 2700-2500 BC.
This J2 guy who lived centuries later was similar to French people only in having similar ratio of Indo-European and pre-Indo-European genetic components.

Stay mad, surrender monkey.

I didn't know, that Ivan the Terrible was Swede.

why are you calling him German?