Started the first world war

>Started the first world war
>Lost to Shitaly
>Beaten by Tsarist Russia in the Brusilov offensive
>Could barely take on Serbia

What was their problem?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WZQaEv4bgp4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

the eternal magyar

The Austrian empire was basically a Frankenstein's monster of ethnic groups and peoples, and brother, it was rotting.

>Fight on more fronts than Germany
>Manage to hold it together
>Most of German army in in Western Europe
>Lose army protecting Germany from Russians
>DUDE sick man!
>LMAO ethnic tension!


And no they did not start WW1, they invaded Serbia not Belgium. It was also Germany that declared war on France and Russia not Austria.

At what point do you consider WW1 to have started and why doesn't any previous point count as it?

At what point does it become a global war? When Austria declares war on Serbia (28 July) or when Germany declares war on Russia (August 1st) and then invades two countries that declared neutrality (August 2nd)? Maybe when Germany declares war on France (August 3rd)? Maybe it was when Britain reminded Germany that Belgium and Luxembourg were neutral (August 4th) and are forced to declare war on Germany?

Germany started wars with so many people it wasn't until August 6th (6 days after) that Austria declares war on Russia. Austria didn't even declare war on France and Britain, it was France and Britain that declared war on them on the 11-12th of August. The "It wasn't Germany it was really Austria!" is the worst Kraut lie ever.

>lost to Italy

Yeah no.
Despite the common thoughts the Austrian army as always been way smaller then the Italian army on the Alpine front (except for the two major offensives).
The last victory was at Caporetto and the Battle of Vittorio Veneto cannot even be considered a battle due to the previous mass desertions in the austrian army, basically General Diaz had just to advance and nothing else.
The most dumbest things Austria has done was the disorganized invasion of Serbia and not changing the attack plans against Russia after discovering the betrayal of General Alfred Redl (pic related).

>revising history to fit your anti-German bias
Wew lad.

>Inventing lies about your allies and own citizens to cover for your colossal diplomatic and military screw up
>Going so far as to genocide people because its easier than admitting you lost a war because of your own mistakes

Wew lad right back at you Jerry.

Poor leadership and organization from the Emperor on down. AHE had few capable generals and they largely held their own in their respective theatres but there's only so much you can do when hamstrung by leadership and given unclear or conflicting orders.

Meme forced construct like the EU.

Good post

Reality has an anti-german bias

>Ottomania
lol wut

this thousand times
folks keep babbling about multi-ethnic mess but people got along pretty well everywhere except in hungary, which also after 1867 compromise blocked every attempt on federalization.

>Kingdom of Hungary
>50% hungarian

>Shitaly

Italy is great and has a respectable military

>Nationalists.
>Calling anybody forced constructs.
>Especially old monarchies.
Apparently, those people managed to live side by side for centuries but suddenly one of them goes DUDE MY ANCIENT NATION THAT HAS ALWAYS EXISTED AND THEREFORE MUST HAVE A NATION STATE LMAO

Hungary not giving a dim about the K.u.K army, out of fear that it could be used against them.

Nobody has a respectable military except the United States in the modern day.

>Forced to declare war on Germany
Tell yourself that, bong. WW1 could have been a short, decisive land war in europe.

Austrians are germans.

You're only partially right. The bongs would've found a different pretext to attack Germany. They were afraid of the german sailor.

The British cabinet was pretty firmly against war up until the moment that Belgium was invaded. And even then, the Cabinet was narrowly divided on the issue.

You need some excuse for Brexit shilling my man. It doesn't look so retarded to potentially nuke your Economy and memeeing in the exit negotiations when you can just compare the EU to A-U. So you can sperg about leaving the sinking ship.

Nah my man. Anglos were scared shitless. They rather risked bankrupting themselves and loosing their Empire than accepting German primacy on the continent. Germany is to Blame for that partly because of the retarded fleet expansion though.

i thought it was 40%

>WW1 could have been a short, decisive land war in europe.

Not after Germany attacked France and Russia
Reminder that France alone stopped the German advance at the First Marne (long before Brits could send any mattering help) and turned the war into attrition
If Britain hadnt joined, Germany would probably have won, but not before late 1917 and millions of dead on both sides

Ehhhh. Without GB Germany would have overwhelmed France faster.

France casualties would have mounted really quick because all the Battles were GB commited most of the Forces would have been entirely French casualties.

Also mutinies would have occured sooner than OTL with even worse consequences.

This man was their problem.

>DUDE JUST A SCRAP OF PAPER LMAO!
>Get fucked six ways from Sunday
>THIS THE JEWS FAULT
Germany was fucking retarded

The mutinies only effected offensive actions, they were more than willing to fight defensively (which by the way was the original German plan, to take the Marne and then bunker down)

Considering the germans self-image as invincible world beaters after the franco-prussian war it doesn't really surprise me that they thought they could just do what they want.

It is retarded how they dealt with the aftermath though, it was literally the opposite of it's the Jews fault, most of the shitty decision makers that were ousted from their positions by the end of WW1 funnily enough end up popping up years later when the Nazis first start to gain ground in government.

The whole Jewish socialists ruined Germany meme was invented by Ludendorff to excuse his own shitty offensive, so it makes sense

Wrong
You have to remember that until late 1916, France was basically alone on the Western Front because the British numbers were so small
Germany would have beaten France, but no sooner than 1917

>Austrian Empire
it's navy smashed, it's armies scattered, it's subjects pried from it's cold dead hands

>British Empire
Navy a shadow of it's former self through spending cuts, it's armies little more than a naval base garrison around the world, and it's subjects left to greener pastures

one went out with a bang, while the other is still just sizzling along. Which way to go is preferrable?

Anglos forever mad about AH.
youtube.com/watch?v=WZQaEv4bgp4

Magyard at the finest.
The Hungarian Parliament lived to ensure their primary over all other ethnicity in the empire. They voted consistently against the expansion of the army, and at anything that would unify the empire since they would loose their power status.

Couldn't understand eachother