Why are dumb people so attracted to the Nazis and WW2?

Why are dumb people so attracted to the Nazis and WW2?

Like we have tons of threads every day and virtually all are sub standard and obviously only frequented by puberal mouth breathers.

just /pol/ seapage

>Easy to access part of history
>Nazism appeals to people with "struggles"
>/pol/

It's simple really

Because, as JFK noted, Hitler was the most remarkable man of the 20th century. He had a cult of personality in life, and it somewhat remains after death.

Media saturation of Nazi imagery doesn't help.

>Like we have tons of threads every day and virtually all are sub standard and obviously only frequented by puberal mouth breathers.
You act as if that isn't the norm for ALL threads on this shit board.

I blame the popular culture which often simplifies things depicting the Nazis and Hitler as the absolute evil-for-evils-sake and everyone who opposed them as the good guys. This makes them appealing to edgy contrarian teenagers of all ages who try hard to be as shocking as possible.

>can has intelligent thread about roman trade routes
>can has intelligent thread about meso american agriculture
>can has intelligent thread about great nordic war
>can has intelligent thread about italian city republics

>can't has intelligent thread bout ww2

Maybe because non-white people are actually shit tier for the most part and he wasn't wrong about the international jew clique and growing degeneracy of influence from it.
Though I think real ebil nautzhis!! see that race, culture, heritage is more important than you are led on to think and that everyone should be proud and fight for who they are
t. /pol/

>hitler was pro-White

>Oy vey how dare you fantasize about a world where both (((capitalism))) and (((communism))) don't exist, where the middle east is still stable, where the Americas aren't full of retarded gangs and drugs, and where Africa isn't headed for both the biggest polulation spike in world history and subsequently the highest population drop ever known to man. The world is perfectly fine the way it is you stupid goy!!!!

You could probably just find a better answer by looking up what made nazism appealing before and during ww2

Y-you're an edgy contrarian that's 15 years old!!
Checkmate neckbeard!!!

>my branch of autism is better than yours

Who are smart people attracted to?

>Stormfags actually believe that the world would be a utopia if the Nazis won

Napoleonic France, Victorian Britain and high medieval HRE.

>just /pol/ seapage
I think you are right when I see this shit:

I like your taste

>A Rome related hread that doesn't devolve into a debate on who exactly is white
>A Meso-American thread that doesn't devolve into that butthurt autistic ranting about the superiority of the Inca to Eurangutans
>A discussion related to Nordics that doesn't devolve into /int/ memes
>A discussion related to Italy that doesn't devolve into debating if Italians are white

Literally things that don't happen here.

>Victorian Britain
Subhuman Anglo spotted.

>No drug trade in Central and South America, which hindered their development
>No communism in South America which has also hindered their development
>No communism in China which has hindered their development (they probably would've colonized fucking stars by now)
>No influential clashes of islamist capitalism and atheistic communism which destroyed the middle east and any future it might have
>No Manchildren in Japan and South Korea
>No North Korea
>No cultural marxism and political correctness in Europe and the US

You're honestly a fucking retard if you think the "good guys" won WW2

ohayo gozaimasu /pol/san

Hello /alt-his/

>utopia

I don't think he said that. And it seems pretty undeniable that, for people who hold certain political views, the world where the Axis powers won would be preferable to the world as it is today.

...

>for people who hold certain political views
You mean like being a totalitarian fascist?
Thats bad enough, but why do they need to come on Veeky Forums and make low test threads all day about it?
Like with every post they prove that they have no idea about history and a bad education (and bad manners at that). It is like every white trash cliché come true.

I'd destroy her ass if you catch my drift ;)

>You have no idea about history
>Unfortunately I cannot refute for I am far too busy shitposting

If you seriously think I discuss the south american drug trade as a direct result of the allies winning WW2 than you are about as dumb as your post makes you look like.
please take your tinfoil hat shit back to /pol/

If you think that both capitalism and communism are controlled by Jews, then what was the Cold War? A hoax?

>You mean like being a totalitarian fascist?

Or any sort of nationalist, or anybody who prefers traditional morality over progressivism, or who values greatness over equality, or puts the long-term needs of the people above the immediate hedonistic desires of the individual, or anybody who doesn't view Nietzsche's Last Man as a role model... there are a whole bunch of views that could lead to wanting a different WWII outcome.

>low test threads

Am I supposed to take you seriously after this?

>Like with every post they prove that they have no idea about history and a bad education (and bad manners at that)

Barely above straight-up calling people you disagree with stupid.

>No communism in China which has hindered their development (they probably would've colonized fucking stars by now)
Of course, no communism in China, just the whole country getting raped by Japan.
>No influential clashes of islamist capitalism and atheistic communism which destroyed the middle east and any future it might have
"Islamist capitalism"?

>Or any sort of nationalist, or anybody who prefers traditional morality over progressivism, or who values greatness over equality, or puts the long-term needs of the people above the immediate hedonistic desires of the individual, or anybody who doesn't view Nietzsche's Last Man as a role model... there are a whole bunch of views that could lead to wanting a different WWII outcome.
The things you mention aren't all bad, but none of them are worth mass murder.

>Nazism appeals to people with "struggles"

You could say the same about Communism, they're both retarded

>they're both retarded

There's nothing wrong with National Socialism though.

Damn user, you must've thought about this a lot

Have you also taken into account the inevitable economic collapse of Germany? The US's GDP during the worst of the war was still higher than Germany's before the war, niggers in the US during the war probably had a higher standard of living than the average German citzen, definitely higher than the average German Soldier.

But living as a fucking peasant is ok so long as you don't know any better right?

>There's nothing wrong with National Socialism though.

Maybe for Germany, it's definitely retarded when non-Germans think they can make an autistically German version of fascism work in their own country instead of digging into the roots of their own history and coming up with one that fits the needs of his own people.

Its just lazy and being lazy is pretty degenerate bud

>Have you also taken into account the inevitable economic collapse of Germany?
So you're saying Germany would have collapsed anyway, making the whole war a needless redundancy and waste of lives?

>dumb

Jew, please. It was one of the most important wars in human history and modern enough to have a large number of documentary footage and writing free for studying.

It may come as a shock but have you ever entertained the thought that Adolf Hitler may not have been that good of a leader? To be fair however, this path of destruction was set into motion before he took power, all he did was try to stave it off. Look up the Wages of Destruction by Adam Tooze, he goes in depth about the sorry state of Germany's economy.

I've got nothing against the Germans, I feel bad for them to be honest, they were fucked since 1918 and there wasn't much they could do about it

Except for that little mass murder ww2 episode with totalitarian suppression of every opposition and shit right?

>Or any sort of nationalist
Patriotism doesn't make you a nazicuck

>or anybody who prefers traditional morality over progressivism,
If you'd feel more comfortable in the 50's thats your thing, but times evolving and you not being comfy with it has nothing to do with who won ww2

>or who values greatness over equality,
muh I need a big man leader much?

>or puts the long-term needs of the people above the immediate hedonistic desires of the individual,
>implying I would want you in charge of either my long term needs or hedonistic desires

>or anybody who doesn't view Nietzsche's Last Man as a role mode
baby read its first Nietzsche

You are the classic "I can't confront with society and people don't do what I want them to do so I sympathize with the worlds most prominent beta uprising in history" poster

You know whats worst of it all? That you discuss it on Veeky Forums instead of /pol/ where it belongs.

Same reasons degenerates are attracted to faggotory and fluid genders lunacy.

>please take your tinfoil hat shit back to /pol/
No, the retard are you. I am from Hispanic America (and I dont support nazionalism), but the USA government is part of the drugs traffic.

But you dont know it because you're retard who dont know nothing about real life

>nazionalism
nazism*

>A Meso-American thread that doesn't devolve into that butthurt autistic ranting about the superiority of the Inca to Eurangutans

if dumb niggers didn't reply to the autistic peruvian and his incaposting this would literally not be an issue

>It may come as a shock but have you ever entertained the thought that Adolf Hitler may not have been that good of a leader?
Yes?
The purpose of my statement was to point out that if Germany was inherently doomed to collapse then them winning the war isn't that big of a deal.

>Wages of Destruction
Read it.

Just because someone doesn't get irrationally bent out of shape over the Nazis doesn't make them a Nazi user.

Oh, ok I see your point

Real Nazis would have hated American suburbia. It destroys the pastoral and the rural village, in favor of just expanding the "city" immensely with travel all done by the automobile.

The correct answer is not that the Axis powers should have won, but rather the Central powers.

How would Germany winning in Europe lead to all this? They'd be too busy being in a cold war against the British Empire and the US, any scenario where either are invaded is a pipe dream.

Even without the incaposter it'd devolve to cuck memes with some crying about human sacrifice thrown in there.

Because Veeky Forums is now a satellite state of the /pol/ish empire which is gradually conqu- reunifying the boards of Veeky Forums. If you don't like it you could always leave this cesspit of a website.

The Alexis powers are overwhelming