Why don't modern crematoriums use the same techniques the Nazis used? It would save a lot of time...

Why don't modern crematoriums use the same techniques the Nazis used? It would save a lot of time. Supposedly they cremated a body every 10 minutes.

Because modern crematoriums have to treat the bodies with utmost respect, have to keep them separate/one at a time in order to present a specific set of ashes to a specific family, are used infrequently and need to follow extensive guidelines on health and safety fir the workers.

>extensive guidelines on health and safety
Isn't ash nontoxic though? Or is it just from handling corpses?

I honestly miss when people would post gore to be edgy, this is just so tryhard

Handling corpses, breathing in dust/ash, dealing with machinery and tools, the actual furnace itself, etc.

And because the average dead American is obese, unlike the average person who died from starvation or typhus.

We've lost this superior german technology, and scientists are still trying to recreate it.

750'000 jews were burnt, like logs (using no accelerant nor wood underneath), suspended over railway lines accros concrete blocks (like a makeshift barbeque)

this is the official account, and must be accepted, even though it's impossible

get a lamb leg, put it on a bbq and the grab a lighter and set it on fire until it burns to dust, bone and all. now get 750'000 lambs and do the same thing, burn teeth skulls, everything. until not a single trace remains. using no fuel. because meat and bones burn like wood, to dust.

it's impossibe. this isn't just hypothesized, it's canon, it's in the official account. you deny this? you're a revisionist, and therefore a jew hater

pull out your tooth, and then grab a lighter and hold it to the tooth. will it burn to dust? will 750,00*24? with literal no trace reamaining? so much so that the only excavation of the supposed site of all this breaking of the laws of physics turns up nothing but a sharks tooth and a broken piece of pottery

is this coherent?

no

Shadilay!

>it's a stormcunt presenting hyperbole and a piss poor analogy episode

Proof?

Seriously though, where the fuck are the mods and janitors?

posting on /pol/

how is that a bad analogy?

lamb meat is much the same as human meat I assume

Furnace is not a BBQ. It is insulated on all sided, plastered with deflective heat resistant coating that can insulate the walls. Furnaces are often powered by manual and electrical air source, which is crucial to reaching critical temperatures for materials such as steel, copper and bronze.

I will be quite surprised if you can make steel burning white with a BBQ.

t. blacksmith

You're seriously suggesting they just held lighters next to the bodies?

Nazi magic lighters

>Isn't ash nontoxic though?
It sure as hell isn't good for your lungs if you get some on your face. And this is people dead from who knows what. Ash from burned wood(for example) is okay. But if there's, say, a significant amount of heavy metals in the mix somehow, it gets pretty toxic.

This
Cramming multiple bodies into one furnace might be efficient but it isn't respectful

You also save a lot of time by not letting the furnace cool (necessary if you say, want to sweep up all the ash for a little urn for the family) in between burnings.

what are you on about?

that's literally the official treblinka narrative, a small fire is lit under a 2-3 story high mass of human torches suspened over nigger tier bbqs made of railway lines suspended over concrete blocks

750 thousand jews (at least) were burnt to dust in this fashion, bones teeth and all

supposedly

maybe learn a little about the holocaust before you rabidly defend it idiot

So now it's gone from "a lighter" to "a small fire"? Really activates the old almonds.

>Non-invasive geophysical survey has allowed the location of a number ofmass graves and cremation pitsto be determined in the extermination camp. These areas were then avoided during more invasive work so as to comply with Jewish Halacha Law. These graves will hopefully be marked in the future.

>Cremated and non-cremated human remainswere located on the surface of the extermination camp area and also during the excavations. These remains were scattered remains, not buried in mass graves. All of these remains werereinterred by a representative from the Office of the Chief Rabbi of Poland.

What did they mean by this?

Are you implying that respecting Jewish burial laws is just an excuse to hind the fact the holocaust didn't happen?

because that's really stupid, and the Jews are hardly the only group that dont like the idea of people digging up their dead to study them

I'm implying that the guy I'm replying to is a moron who doesn't know what he's talking about.

Bodies at concentration camps weren't reduced to dust. Burning the flesh was a primitive means of mitigating infectious disease. There are photographs of burnt bodies stacked like cordwood.

A modern cremation is meant to pulverize the body, and involves heavy chemicals and a sort of wood chipper for femurs and other strong bones.