How can one man be so absolutely correct about everything?
How can one man be so absolutely correct about everything?
Liam Cooper
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
counterpunch.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
Gavin Wright
I agree, the Cambodian Genocide never occured.
Jace Russell
He's so right about everything that people that dislike him have to make shit up instead of discussing what he says.
Joseph Gomez
Wrong Jew
Cooper King
You're right. He doesn't deny it. He just says America is to blame. I guess America made Pol Pot round up and execute everyone with glasses. It's a shame we never learn about that part of history.
Josiah Sullivan
>I'll keep making shit up until something sticks
Oliver Morales
You realize that America armed Pol Pot's movement for longer than they opposed it, right?
Isaac Nelson
Noah Evans
Glad to seen that more people are redpilled about Big Brother #1.
counterpunch.org
Camden Fisher
By being absolutely incorrect about everything else.
Ayden Smith
Ah yes, another quality thread brought to us by & humanities.
Carson Miller
How nice of the video to tell me what to think of what chomsky is saying. No wonder you believe the shit you spout, you are fed what to think like a retard.
There is no genocide denial, nor any exclusive blame to america in that video, which were your two claims. It's a very basic explanation of how two similar events are reported differently by the media, and how little is requested in terms of evidence when the claim is useful (regardless of it being true or not).
Elijah Garcia
Except the video doesn't spout opinions. It spouts facts. Chomsky intentionally spouts misleading details and lies and the video corrects him and even cites its sources.
>being this brainwashed by a Pol Pot loving charlatan
Colton Moore
The video repeatedly states that the genocides are not comparable, while also repeatedly stating that they both genocided the same proportion of the population (using the highest estimate for the cambodian genocide). I don't really give a fuck about what the author considers "comparable in scale" or not, which IS an opinion, but he pretty much refutes itself. Chomsky's point is pretty fucking obvious but somehow flies over both your and the video author's head, he's discussing how the media works and not the cambodian genocide in itself.
Hudson Morris
ayy anarcho syndicalism lmao
Xavier Parker
Because he looks at things objectively with no fancy philosophical ideology or jargon and applies the same critical standards to all sides no matter what
Aaron Wood
>Because he looks at things objectively
>Says Bakunin was right about dictatorships of the proletariat (despite Anarchist in Catalonia forming them)
>ignores the fact that Bakunin advocated for a secret dictatorship
>Groups "libertarian" Marxism and Anarchism under the same rubric unironically because he thinks they're both extensions of humanism.
Matthew Robinson
>comparable in scale is an opinion
A mountain doesn't compare to a planet
>Just an opinion
A nuclear bomb doesn't compare to a supernova
>Just an opinion
A Saint Bernard doesn't compare to an elephant
>Just an opinion
Caleb Robinson
The Kmher Rouge would never have gotten to the point where they could do that if it weren't for CIA funding
Carter Hughes
>bakunin is wrong because someone did something he said was wrong
>proofs?
>implying they don't have the same origin
Isaiah Long
controlled opposition dude..
he believes the official story of 911
youtube.com
he's great! if you need help going to sleep, try listening to some real philosophers, who help you to think differently, rather than telling you what to think
Sebastian Hall
The US supported Pol Pot, primarily because he opposed Viet Cong.
Nolan Jones
>criticizes the foundations of capitalism and private property
>owns several big houses
Matthew Stewart
>Communists/socialists don't money where there mouth is
Not surprising at all desu