*Teleports behind you*

as long as i feel more pleasure than its lack ,i can remain alive. we should not give up because of nonsense of life but accept it.

and rationality in economics is quite diffrent than elsewhere

*Criticizes government power and authoritarianism*
*praises P*nochet*

Better than those commies?
Of course. He endorsed a reform of the educational system and killed those several communist professors that were ruinning generations of academic potential.

Hayek rejected praxeology, the basis of his economics is that human irrationality is countered by the signalling function of prices

>authoritarianism is okay when it agrees with me and only kills people I don't like
Stalinists say the same thing, you know.

Ignorant twerp.

>Le Austrian School of Memeconomics
Not even laughter at this point

>ruin a country for an entire century fucking up the lives of millions of people, generation by generation
>kill the protesters
Or
>not ruin a country
>kill protesters
Hmm...

I guess mathematics is also not a science according to you.

Is the Keynesian "Krugman doesn't represent us" user in this thread yet?

Intellectual lightweight

It isn't you retard

So you're saying that the ends justify the means and that murder committed by the state is okay if it makes life better for everyone else?

It's simple.

Comparing a punch on the face and a backstab will get an obvious answer no matter how many strawmen you pull. Everyone can try to trivialized these matters, but it's so self-evident that it's almost comical how you try to avoid the comparison between the two.

Pinochet was better than the commies.

Interesting. Is he wrong because he's a hypocrite, or is he wrong because he's wrong?

/pol/tard far-righters are truly no different from the far-left

>Nothing you can gain in life is of any lasting or real value
Plenty that you gain in life lasts as long as you live.
It only loses value after you die.

Living is totally rational.

>Pinochet was better than the commies
Better than Stalinism, sure. But that's really only meaningful if there are no choices other than Pinochet or Stalinism.

that mises quote is sound. there are others ways to affirm or deny systematically predicated propositions by means other than experience

Right, so...

OP claims some random asshat "proves" that something is "irrational", implying general human behavior isn't, despite even economist acknowledging that it is, and some other asshat getting the nobel prize for that astounding breakthrough insight.

>As long as it feels alright, it's alright, just accept it's all irrational, hurr durr... OH! EXCEPT socialism, that's bad, you know, IRRATIONAL!

Clearly a mastermind logician at work here.
I really wish someone would gas all you fucking imbecile cunts. Or run you over with a truck or whatever. Anyway, fuck you.

Just don't pretend that it is emperical or in touch with reality

Mises Institute takes issues with praxeology.

mises.org/library/praxeology-methodology-austrian-economics

Which shows their integrity. They research, adapt, look for answers and correct past mistakes. Much better than the "spending spending spending" school of lel economics.

>Much better than the "spending spending spending" school of lel economics.
Yeah, being better than a strawman is really something to be proud of.

You don't know how maths work.

>mathematics is also not a science
Holy shit, please tell me that you're only pretending to be retarded.

Mathematics is the study of the relationship between abstracts which are held as absolute truths. Science is the empirical observation and recreation of natural phenomena in ways that yield predictable results. They go hand in hand but they're their own distinct families of thought.

He argues against central planning, he never really engages with socialism. Not that his arguments weren't answered. Also, sraffa destroyed him.

The biggest problem with the Laissez Faire approach to economics is environmental damage. At the end of the day, if you don't have strict laws against pollution, corporations will run amok.

Stimulate well, Shinzo

Thanks for the info.
A summary over sraffa's counterpoint?

Sraffa doesn't discuss hayek's refutal of "socialism", but rather hayek's own economic theories.
You can read the discussion here:
jstor.org/stable/2223735?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
jstor.org/stable/2223821?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
jstor.org/stable/2223822?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
I hope you like banter.

He's right, even the 3 or so socialist economists still around admit he was right. Mainstream economics admit he was right

See

> supports Pinochet
no thanks

Except all socialist movements tend to go authoritary and supress the other parties if they aren't stopped.

They can avoid the obsolete socialist system yet their theft, complete destruction of the market and a similar outcome on education, will doom generation's future.

Pinochet was better than the alternatives. Nowadays the influence of such leftist methods that europe has used and got nothing but problems for them, will fuck up their economy and dependence of the national education and general poverty.

I'm not a poltard. I know what commie professors do on my country and how they ruin the youth's future and how are their methods when it comes to completely ignorant people.

Pinochet is great

Stimulate well Shinzo

Stimulate well Shinzo

i told you that irrationality in economics have diffrent meaning than in philosophy.

The government is responsible for a lot of environmental damage. The free market is going to give us solutions for the protection of the environment not the government.

>Mathematics is no Science
>Calls other retards
Pottery

Not to sound like a weeb, but the correct romanization would be Shinzou.

Stimulate well Shinzo

As has so eloquently put it. It is not science.

That's a bold prediction pal, im sure you put you money where your mouth is and have invested cash in it and that you are not just merely spouting the mythology of your economical spook.

weeb

"Stimulate well Shinzo"

>The government is responsible for a lot of environmental damage.
That's almost entirely because of defense spending, and defense spending is just about the only thing about the government that right-wingers (aside from a tiny, irrelevant minority of libertarian hold-outs) want to make bigger, aside from maybe law enforcement spending and mass incarceration.

>The free market is going to give us solutions for the protection of the environment not the government.
The free market causes the entire planet to become a giant tragedy of the commons. Companies fixate on short-term margins and have little incentive to serve anyone but their shareholders.. Only governments have the large scale organization and capital-base necessary to coordinate such large-scale shifts in industrial output