Innocence of Muslims

Did muslims really chimp out because of this shitty video? Is this what caused Benghazi?

youtube.com/watch?v=nGsFHAO0pMA

yes the muslim world is autistic and mobby

Can somebody tell me who Acts15Apologetics is?

A Soldier of the Lord

No, seriously. I heard him mentioned in a James Portnow thread that used him as an example for how Muslims will flag any Youtube video that paints them in a negative light, and that's why Portnow acts like the Crusades were unjustifiable and deplorable.

No, Benghazi was caused by the US government overthrowing an anti-imperialist socialist leader through Islamist proxies, and then expecting these proxies to throw away their CIA-bought rifles and missile launchers.

honestly acting like those medieval conflicts are actually relevant today is a stupid game in the first place
historical misinformation should be corrected but the dick measuring contest between muslim conquests and the crusades is just real problems today manifesting themselves in pointless historical arguments instead of facing them directly.

The crusaders were pretty unjustified. Even if you truly believe that it's defensive to conquer a territory that's been held by Muslims for 400 years, the land should have been given back to the Byzantine Emperor or to the local Near Eastern Christians. Random Frenchmen and Germans didn't have any claim to that land. Their Christianity didn't even look very much like the Christianity that was practiced locally.

For a comparison, imagine if King Salman of Saudi Arabia invaded the Philippines on the basis that the islands were once owned by Muslims. This claim is ludicrous! But any more than the shaky basis upon which the Crusaders were fought.

Muslims didn't give a shit about the Crusades until Western colonialism and Westerners didn't give a shit about the Crusades until Muslims started blowing themselves up in the West

Trying to moralize any of this is a waste of time tbqh

>25 year rule

That movie was a fake psyop/cover-up filmed by CIA front companies. the movie itself doesn't exist.

>the land should have been given back to the Byzantine Emperor or to the local Near Eastern Christians
They had promised to do the former, and then the Byzantines fucked them over. To be fair, Stephen of Blois is also pretty responsible, that guy was the worst. As for the latter, who do you think invited them to stay? In the case of Baldwin, who founded Edessa, he even married the daughter of the local Armenian noble.

>this was made in 2015
what a shitty camera quality

proof?

>"lmao MUDSLIMES are so easily offended! Goatfuckers am I right? Freedom of speech, deal with it. Nobody cares if you're offended"
>*someone denies or questions the extent of the holocaust*
>"REEEE LOCK HIM UP!!"

westerners are hypocrites. They scream about freedom of speech and their right to offend muslims, but the second something offends them, they want the government to punish the one offending them.

Your "holy" "prophet" of "Allah" was a child molester.

what does that have to do with what i said?

and your "founding fathers" were rapists, and so was christopher columbus and a bunch of other historical figures you admire.

also, the holocaust didn't happen.

You are a butthurt muslim.

>your "founding fathers"
I am not american and I hate America.
>christopher columbus
citation needed
>the holocaust didn't happen
Sure thing, Abdul.

I don't have my links just look around for stuff about it. It was a massive psyop.

i'm not muslim
>citation needed
read anybook
>sure thing abdul
see above.
and it didn't

you're a butthurt kike

>le paedo meme xD
Aisha was pubescent when the marriage was consumed you cuck, that's the whole point of the hadith about her age.

besides, everyone at the time used to do it, so its not like he could have known it was wrong.

Like, in 2000 years from now, if they make the age of consent 25, they'd say everyone who fucked an 18 year old is a paedophile.

its ridiculous applying moral standards based on teh current age to an era where they didn't even exist.

also muhammad married a 40 year old widowed woman as his first wife, marriage wasn't about love at that time, it was about forming alliances between tribes and families.