Any kind of deviancy gets you sent to a firing squad or gas chamber

>any kind of deviancy gets you sent to a firing squad or gas chamber
>an entire unit was made up of released psychopaths, rapists, murderers and paedophiles

How are these two narratives reconciled?

It's called using people you don't like, user. Every nation does it. He was good at exterminating people and that's all the nazis cared about for his job position.

>falling for jewish propaganda
Dirlewanger was so renowned for his pacifism and generosity that he was nicknamed "Gandhi"

Guy gets a pretty bad rap when all he did was embezzle money and bang a 14 year old yet people talk about him like he was some nazi Jeffrey Dahmer. I mean yea he was a crook of all sorts and an alcoholic but also a hero of ww1 and the german revolution.

>Hero
>German Revolution
>Hero of WW1
The guy was a sociopath who ran a unit of crooks. Lettow was a hero, Rommel was a hero.

>Martin Windrow, the British historian, described the division as a "terrifying rabble" of "cut-throats, renegades, sadistic morons, and cashiered rejects from other units"

Were they the Night's Watch IRL?

Fuck off back to plebbit

Fuck off back to plebbit

Two iron crosses and rose to the rank of lieutenant in ww1 and fought in the freikorps against the commies.

It amazes me how many people actually eat up this bullshit

>being this deluded

This is your brain on /pol/.

>Guy gets a pretty bad rap when all he did was embezzle money and bang a 14 year old yet people talk about him like he was some nazi Jeffrey Dahmer.
This.

Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck was perfectly fine with the genocide of Africans and commended the leadership of General von Trotha.

There is literally nothing wrong with genociding Africans.

I don't doubt he was a war criminal but when I open his cuckpedia page and see shit like
>according to British historians
or
>Timothy Snyder claims
I take all of it with a grain of salt.

It amazes me how many people sitll deny nazi and soviet war-crimes despite the pile of evidence.

>implying they didn't give out so many iron crosses they made them effectively worthless

>be Nazi Germany in 1940
>create combat outfit composed of thugs and criminals "convicted of major crimes such as premeditated murder, rape, arson and burglary"
>"terrifying rabble" of "cut-throats, renegades, sadistic morons, and cashiered rejects from other units"
>unit turns out to be an almost comical band of fuckups who were kicked out of every major field command they were assigned to and whose most noteworthy achievement was sadism and brutality that appalled even the most notorious architects of the Holocaust

>be Louisiana in 1861
>create combat outfit composed of “the lowest scum of the lower Mississippi...adventurous wharf rats, thieves, and outcasts...and bad characters generally”
> the worst men I ever saw…. I understand that they are mostly wharf rats from New Orleans, and Major Wheat is the only man who can do anything with them. They were constantly fighting with each other. They were always ready to fight, and it made little difference to them who they fought.”
>unit turns out to be one of the best in the Confederate Army, earning a legendary reputation for being utterly fearless and hard-fighting, becoming the Army of Northern Virginia's premiere shock troops alongside the Texas and Stonewall Brigades

Where did we get it so right where the Krauts got it so wrong?

Did they fear the Southern Warrior?

More importantly, what if a nine month pregnant Anne Frank mysteriously teleported into the middle of a Confederate Army camp of Louisiana Tigers?

Would they be courtly Southern gentlemen and take her to meet General Lee? Sing Bonnie Blue flag and Rose of Alabamy by the campfire with her? Share their sweet tea and hardtacks with her? Teach her to do the Rebel Yell?

>the state of Veeky Forums

>any kind of (hypothetical) counter-revolutionary thought or action gets you sent to gulag
>entire battalions made up of political criminals and counter-revolutionaries

Why do people start threads with blatantly stupid questions?

They were held at gunpoint though. Dirlewanger was allowed to run amok.

>implying people in power hold themselves accountable

>uses the word 'cuckpedia'
I don't think you realize how much of idiot this makes you look.
>according to British historians
There is not one mention of the word 'British' in his Wikipedia page.

a criminal is a human who chooses to harm someone, they are to be punished

a degenerate is a subhuman, whether or not they harm anyone is irrelevant, they are a stain to be removed

[gets beat to death by Polish guards]

And you're saying that murderers and rapists aren't degenerates?

People triggered by the word cuck shouldn't post on Veeky Forums.

>pedophilia and alcoholism is not degeneracy

They were allowed to loot and murder and rape. That's enough of a motivation.

People who use the word 'cuck' should definitely not be posting on Veeky Forums

this

Dude, he WAS Gandhi. Look at the nose and the pixels

>Veeky Forums is a redditor safe space where mean words can't be used

cuck

xdd

>communists are subhuman deviants who should be exterminated because they do awful things

>it's okay to do awful things because these subhuman deviants did it ;)

How are these two narratives reconciled?

You never apply the same standards to yourself as you apply to your enemy. Hitler's closest associate (Rohm) was a literal degenerate faggot, and Hitler even defended it for over a decade. He literally had to plan a fucking coup to get killed, everyone ignored his homosexuality.
Now imagine if someone like Stalin or Roosevelt was an open faggot, the nazis would run that shit to the ground with propaganda.

cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck cuck

Correct, pedophilia is not degeneracy. It has a long and noble history dating from the early 20th century, to ancient Rome, Greece, Egypt, and China, and beyond, deep into prehistory. Feminist slander is the only reason it's not considered acceptable today.

t. pedo

>forget this guy name
>google "evil nazi dude"
>first result

Irrelevant. The facts are there either way.

calling someone a cuck isn't exactly "a high level of discourse", shitting on someone for their (possible) weird sexual kinks has nothing to do with history.

Rulecucking has no place on Veeky Forums either.

Lets look at the great historians who compiled the accurate knowledge about Dirlewanger
>Steven Zaloga- Bachelor of Arts History, professional WW2 model maker
>Richard Rhodes- Another bachelor's degree "historian" with left leaning sympathies, to quote his book on the Spanish Civil War from his website- "The Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) inspired and haunted an extraordinary number of exceptional artists and writers, including Pablo Picasso, Joan Miro, Martha Gellhorn, Ernest Hemingway, George Orwell and John Dos Passos. The idealism of the cause--defending democracy from fascism at a time when Europe was darkening toward a second world war--and the bruality of the conflict drew from them some of their best work: Guernica, For Whom the Bell Tolls, Homage to Catalonia, The Spanish Earth.
>Timothy Snyder- another historian heavily invested in the holocaust image. Aember of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Conscience of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Snyder needs to maintain the image of the brutal German soldier, Snyder is also married to a Jew, Marci Shore, who herself is a "holocaust historian" and an assistant professor of history and Jewish studies at Indiana University, and the Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Visiting Assistant Professor of Judaic Studies at Yale.

I fucking hate Timothy Snyder and I'm not even referring to the Holocaust issue. He had a lecture in my (Eastern European) country in 2014 talking about how Putin is basically next Hitler and if we don't suck American cock for all eternity we will all be gulag'd, and how NATO ensures our freedom. It was like Amerigan bear but IRL.

He has recently received the Hannah Arendt Prize (the band Pussy Riot won the year after him) and just received the VIZE 97 Prize, among other winners were Psychoanalyst Julia Kristeva, writer of "Female Genius".
Literally the definition of a Shabbos Goy.

He also went on saying you can't compare Russian and American media, because in Russia they're all controlled by Putin while in America they're all free and not controlled at all by any interest groups

Then find us other Historians who can paint a more accurate image of the man.

Jesus Christ, every news station in the US is owned by a corporation with personal interests.

I'm obviously a evil Nazi, but lets look at Fox News- Rupert Murdoch is heavily invested in oil ventures in the Golan Heights as a chairperson of Genie Energy, an Israeli energy company. This is why you see anti-Assad shit on FOX 24/7, he's balls deep in Israeli interests and gains to profit from the Syrians being pushed out of that area.

Wasn't there an entire thread on /k/ devoted to this that stayed up for like a week?

Valued usefulness over morality?

The only sources on his Wikipedia page are all American.

Fucking moron.
Concentration camps existed and people were killed in them. It is another matter that the citizens of the Soviet Union were killed equally with Jews, and Soviet citizens were killed more than Jews. But this does not cancel the fact that Jews were also killed. Like the Poles, etc.
You just do not know the fucking concentration camps. The fact is that Western countries were part of the Red Cross, Western soldiers were kept in good conditions. They did not see the horrors that the Nazis are doing. Soviet citizens, Soviet soldiers, saw it. And they tortured and tortured themselves.
My grandfather, a Russian, was in a concentration camp, he saw it all. He remained dystrophic until the end of his life, because the Germans poured some chemicals into their food to give their pharmacological firms accountability.
You just do not know the fuck yourself, you live on your coast of South Jersey, your grandfathers and great-grandfathers sat in camps in hothouse conditions, they did not see that fucking Nazis (not only Germans, but also Italians, Romanians, Hungarians, Bulgarians, etc.) created with the "lower races".

You are simply morons.
I read Jürgen Graf, his books were posted on the Internet. But good people did a parallel edition, where they posted pictures. Jürgen Graf lied when he said that the stoves are not suitable for burning people. Jürgen Graf lied when he said that there were no gas chambers, the so-called "death baths". These people posted pictures, where the wells are clearly visible, in order to drop Cyclon B in them, they posted pictures of furnace schemes in which people can be burned to ashes. They laid out everything, they gave proofs, and Jürgen Graf's lies were exposed!

...

>Le Jews

He was also an alcoholic junkie