Who are the Rohingya and why are they being ethnically cleansed?

Because Burma has a history of shitting on it many minorities.

>They get along so well with everyone else.
:^

>signs in English
Wew

They're violent rapists and troublemakers who can go to Bangladesh if they want to practice their one holy religion. Myanmar is not Israel/Palestine.

muslims tried to do the shit to buddhist that they are doing to cucked europeans, and then the buddhist werent having any of it so they BTFO. Now, they are crying like bitches to the UN

This narrative is pretty funny
>Unjust violence from a Nobel Prize winning suffragette and victim of a totalitarian regime
>Buddhist Terror
>Rohingya did nothing wrong
>No, Pajeet, write it for the Camera

The constitution recognizes them as citizens but somewhere along the line too many of them must've decided to start adhering to Saudi and western financed Wahhabi views. This comes along with all the other turmoil in the country and the war of interests between global powers for geopolitical control. Myanmar hasn't exactly been functioning as a democracy either for much of its recent history.

Illegal immigrants from Bangladesh who have been doing thr typical Muslim immigrant sthick of rape and terrorism until Buddhists got tired and now they get whats coming to them and are crying victim

>The constitution recognizes them as citizens
No longer, they've been stripped of their citizenship. They're called Bengalis by the Burmese now, and are treated as illegals

Lol when minimized that picture looks like they're gawking with their eyes wide open.

They could've worked with the Myanmar gov but instead opted to carve out a Muslims dominated state by waging jihad against the local Rakhine Buddhists. They failed at that too as the government fucked them hard.

This "innocent peaceful muslims" narrative is hilarious. We can see who's pushing this too. The Muslim countries like Turkey(now a dictator), Pakistan and Bangladesh(dont want them).

Even if they are being treated unfairly, everyone in the west is jaded by the Western Media's depiction of Western Refugees and knows how to read through the lines.

Bamars hate everyone that isn't Bamar. They're already commiting human rights abuse against people who are of different asian ethnic groups. Now imagine how much contempt they hold for people that aren't the same race or religion.

>implying ARSA remotely represents the attitudes of the average Rohingya
This is from someone who believes they're mostly descended from Bengali immigrants imported by the Brits.

The Muslims countries won't acknowledge ARSA. Myanmar addresses ARSA as the cause of the recent crisis. Most of world don't even know about ARSA and think Myanmar is referring to the Rohingya, as whole, as terrorists.

Narrative is already spun that way.

They're getting genocided because they're different. Just like the other ethnicities in Myanmar.

People keep bringing religion into it when it has almost nothing to do with that. The world will turn a blind eye to it and then cry about not having done anything later just like with Rwanda and the Iraqi Kurds.

You can believe literally anything you want about it. No one cared. No one cares. No one will care. Those people might as well not exist for all the difference it makes.

>race
In the OP they look like brown chinks just like everyone in the region.

Rakhine are not Bamar people. Bamar are the majority. Rahkine only compose of 5% of the country's population.

Although this is between Rakhine and Rohingya ethnic groups, religion does play part in it. The Buddhist Bamar people passively support Rakhine in their fight against the Rohingya muslims.

The Burmese are fair skinned

>in their fight against the Rohingya muslims

Just like Germans support the SS in their fight against the Jews of Warsaw.

Those are mostly Indonesian or Malay protestors.
Just type Rohingya in google

If they were human beings I would maybe give a shit. But to be fair muslims deserve far worse than this.

I think a somewhat closer analogy would be the Israelis shelling Hamas controlled civilian areas. Asians are not tolerant like us. One terrorist attack and your whole group is going to pay. Likewise the Burmese have reached sone kind of breaking point with the religion of peace. And only muslims and their fellow travelers care.

I wonder who's more likely to become an Islamic country in 40 years

A former hyperminority that was exploded into a major demographic by the eternal Anglo importing them for labor purposes, then left to continue a rapid expansion in numbers and occasionally wiping away Buddhist towns, temples, and peoples. This of course, led to backlash, which led to more violence on both sides, etc, and here we are today.

Are you stupid?

Bamar and Rakhine are two different groups of people.

Bamar people have conquered Rakhine state and killed quite a bit of Rakhine people hundred years ago or so. During that time, the British imported the Bengali into Arakan and the Arakan made up the majority of the population.

An accurate example would be "Just like the Germans supported Jews in their fight against the Arab Muslims". This should be more accurate.

>tolerant

It's more like Warsaw. They had been oppressed and became violent due to their condition. Israel vs. Palestine is far more subtle conflict that has been bloody on both sides since day one. It's not like Myanmar doesn't have a known history of doing this to other groups.

guys that burned police stations, murdered locals and then get surprised they go all "let's kill em all" mode... what everyone seems to be forgetting, outside of the western world, no one has white guilt when it comes to genocide... not a saying it's a good thing but still...

Pic unrelated?

You can't sleep with a mad dog, even if you're peaceful.

Are israelis not "tolerant" when they retaliate against Hamas? What about America when they retaliate against Bin Ladin? There are no special people, people are tolerant only to an extent. When the Rakhine people are being killed by the ARSA and the ARSA is raiding 20 different police headquarters in a coordinated attack, its a terrorist attack.

I guess the Christians the Buddhists killed are also violent savages that deserve what they get too, right? I'm 100% certain there are no historical records of Buddhists engaging in extreme violence.

Link?

That's about as fair as Asians come. The Rohingya are obviously black Subcontinentals.

But it's not like this is about race.

Wew they're literal gypsies

Were they Terrorists? If so, sure.

Americans were terrorists
French Revolutionary movement was terror
ww2 partisans were terrorists

fuck off with that god awful meaningless word.

Muslim terrorist apologist

kek

Do they assault the Government?
Do they wish to rule the Country as a new Religious State?
Do they wish to supplant all previous law in favor of Sharia?

No

Weren't those "christians" literally headhunter hillmen until not long before today?

3379381>> Bangladesh was formed in 1972, where as Rohingya people have been in the region from 9th century, or even before.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_people#History

The Burmese say yes. The entire history of Islam says yes.

Bengal, which is what Bangladesh means, is older than any CE

Bangladesh was formed in 1972, where as Rohingya people have been in the region from 9th century, or even before.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_people#History

Bengladesh is a part of Bengal. Half of Bengal falls under present day India.

Maybe on /pol/, but we live in reality.

You have absolutely no understanding about the region, the people, the religions, or their histories and yet you will continue to forever assert your imbecile views.

Because the brits tricked the muslim part into the Pakistan meme and they realised their mistake too late. Now it can't be fixed.

They aren't immigrants from Bangladesh, and they don't have any reason to migrate either. Bangladesh has a better and more vibrant economy compared to Myanmar. Moreover, the Rohingya have been living in the region from 9th century.

It's a little more complicated than that. I hope you are not just shit posting.

Then explain. Why do the Burmese claim attacks and Sharia protests by the Rohingya?

Who is lying to whom? Why am I expected to believe a woman who has nothing but laudations backing her previously is now a genocidal madperson

>Asians are not tolerant like us. One terrorist attack and your whole group is going to pay.
Well that's a good thing. Sends a message to all the other faggots who would want to fuck with them. Unlike westerners who will even invite more shitskins after a surge in terrorist attacks.

Captcha: MERKEL VICTORY

>implying Arab/Persian traders are remotely related Bengali peasants
Please, just stop. Yes their were Muslim traders around the Indian Ocean. But, in no way are they related to the Bengali immigrant workers the Anglos imported. Honestly the rohingya don't deserve this, but jut like in Iraq and Syria the Eternal Anglos incompetence lead to mass genocide and bloodshed.

>they don't have any reason to migrate either
The British consensus records clearly show they migrated in the late 19th to early 20th century.

The population went from few thousands to millions in the span of 50 years. The british even noticed the growing anger/tension when they imported the bengalis into Arakan cities. They knew about the incoming problems related to population displacement. The Arakan were made into a minority in their own home state due to mass imports of labor.

It's called blowback. Suu Kyi was a State Department propaganda victory that has blown up in the face of the west because she also happens to be an ethnic nationalist.

When will the perfidy and machinations of the Eternal Anglo stop?

There's a lot to consider. Aung Si Ki of the past is not the same as today. She's into politics now, and to remain in power she needs to satisfy the Ultra Right Wing.
Secondly Myanmar plans to attract foreign investments in the Rakhine region and needs to free up the lands for resources. In that case why pay the compensation when you can get it for free.

Ah, so a misfire of Western virtue signaling, that does make a slight bit of sense, considering the West's history with figures like bin Laden.
I can buy that, but I still doubt the Rohingya are completely innocent, or that they've always been there. They may not deserve this, but this situation is pretty bad.

I don't think reparations can be made on good terms to either side. They have to control Islamist sentiment.

We've seen that happen before didn't we? Like when bin Laden after being the "hero" of Aghanistan decided not to be an obedient good goy of Saudi royal family and Israel.

Misleading. She was always a politician. Before her imprisonment, before her Noble Peace Prize, after being freed, and now.

Her approach was democracy. She wanted democracy back in the country and move away from the military state. She did it without resorting to violence or revolt, just protest. That's what she got and people celebrated.

She wasn't asking for cure for cancer. She wasn't asking for equality for all. She wasn't asking for world peace or any of the fluffy stuff or seeking to end all violence. Just shift the government from military to democratic government. That's what Myanmar is going through right now.

Never, they rule the world

WTF are you saying? In the pre border nation era do you thing there weren't overlapping of settlers of different ethnic group? Due to Arakan's proximity to Bengal many of the so called rohingya people were living there for a long time. Early evidence of Bengali Muslim settlements in Arakan date back to the time of Min Saw Mon (1430–34) of the Kingdom of Mrauk U.

The rohingya are not completely innocent, there are extremists who have been attacking burmese police. The whole situation is basically due to anglo perfidy though, as others have suggested itt.

>Sri Lanka Buddhist/Tamils
>African state wars
>Middle East wars
>India/Pakistan
>Myanmar/Rohingya
What else? God damn brits fucked up hard everywhere.

Nah, they used to before WW2, but now the Jews have taken over for them.

The numbers and the extent of post-independence immigration from Bangladesh are subject to controversy and debate. In a 1955 study published by Stanford University, the authors Virginia Thompson and Richard Adloff write, "The post-war (World War II) illegal immigration of Chittagonians into that area was on a vast scale, and in the Maungdaw and Buthidaung areas they replaced the Arakanese." The authors further argue that the term Rohingya, in the form of Rwangya, first appeared to distinguish settled population from newcomers: "The newcomers were called Mujahids (crusaders), in contrast to the Rwangya or settled Chittagonian population."According to the International Crisis Group (ICG), these immigrants were actually the Rohingyas who were displaced by the World War II and began to return to Arakan after the independence of Burma but were rendered as illegal immigrants, while many were not allowed to return. ICG adds that there were "some 17,000" refugees from the Bangladesh liberation war who "subsequently returned home".

This just in, Chinese are now officially Anglo!

Chinese don't rule shit, they just do business. America ie the new mask of the Eternal Anglo got the power projection.

The (((jews)))

It was on purpose so it's not a fuck up.

I'm not saying Bengalis didn't exist in Rakhine back then. I'm just saying that most of them are obviously descended from migrant laborers imported by the Brits.

See

Malaysia, they treated the ethnic Chinese better than the Malays. Malay emergency was pretty fucked tier though. Granted they didn't fuck up as much as the Dutch and Indonesia though

The greater problem is that groups like ISIS and Al Qaida will try to capitalize on this situation and try to get a foothold in the region. So called ARSA is relatively a new rebel outfit which comprises of typical farmers who lack the weapons and training. Guess what'll happen once they ISIS and Al Qaida sends in their military advisers.

>wahabbi influence intensifies
Saudis are fucking cancer. I don't get why we backed em for so long in the first place

>globalresearch.ca/the-rohingya-of-myanmar-pawns-in-an-anglo-chinese-proxy-war-fought-by-saudi-jihadists/5607605
They are funded by Saudis

They were capitalizing on it already, basically what has happened in myanmar is that the military has chosen a military solution to a political problem and as usual it has blown up in everyones faces.

I dont believe in le genocide memes but its clearly a strategic defeat for the myanmar govt.

Bangladesh already has a problem with Muslim extremists hacking people to death with machetes. They had a major attack on a cafe where 29 people, mostly foreigners, were killed.

Since people here can't look at a map. The Rohingya are on the border with Bangladesh. If a muslim breathes theres a risk some extremist will build a madrassa nearby instructing them on ways to remove infidels.

What strategic defeat? They've always beena pariah state until the last 2 years. They'll just turn to China for funding

Yep. Israeli lobby in the US and Britain.

R⭕hingya are Bengalis in Myanmar. The purp⭕se of the gen⭕cide is to rem⭕ve a p⭕pulation deemed pr⭕-dem⭕cracy.

>you
ARSA was formed following the 2012 Rakhine State riots. Where as Rohingya genocide and ethnic cleansing has been happening for decades. Apples and oranges.

That's utter bullshit. They might be getting funds from here and there, but the core issue is totally different.

gr is not a reliable source but the importance of rakhine state to the OBOR is without a doubt one of the causes of the latest shitshow

>reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-rohingya/myanmars-rohingya-insurgency-has-links-to-saudi-pakistan-report-idUSKBN1450Y7

crisisgroup.org/crisiswatch/august-2017#myanmar

Founder was born in Pakistan. Schooled in Wahhabi school funded in Saudi Arabia

Bangladeshi Muslim refugees.

Because china wants an oil pipeline built to the area where they most reside

Illegal settlements on someone else's land is fine when it's Muslims doing it

That's because the West believes in diversity
Asians are autistically ethnocentric and xenophobic, the perfect synergy of 20th century nationalism and Confucian obsession with patrilineality.

I'm on the side of whoever John McCain is against.

Muslim Bangladeshis brought to Burma in the 19th and 20th century by the British for a divide-and-conquer scheme against the natives. Their expulsion/genocide is a natural result of the end of British rule in the area, surprised it hasn't happened sooner.

The quicker it's over with the better. Hopefully the "Rohingya" aren't too stupid about this and see the writing on the wall, and take up Bangladesh's offer to harbor them.

Just shut the fuck up you /POL/tard.

trying to be part the Veeky Forums with that shitty logic?

>>I'm not denying what you said, but Saudi Wahabi infiltration is not the root cause. If you're gonna shit post in Veeky Forums at least try to read up some background of the subject.