Find a flaw

It just makes sense

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=b4eEnOQ29A0
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>two groups of Africans can't even share a single small country without genociding the fuck out of each other
>LET'S MAKE AFRICA WITH HUNDREDS OF TRIBES A SINGLE COUNTRY
Hmmm what could go wrong

This is why a common African identity must be adopted after sufficient urbanization. High IQ city people from the Cape to Casablanca will usher in a new Africa. What you are discussing is what happens when rural retards are thrust into governance

>city people
>high IQ
Those tend to be the biggest retards, especially in Africa.

>common African identity
The idea that this can exist is just about as retarded as the idea there's such a thing as a common European or common Asian identity.

It is commonly easier to have a group of many of different people rather than 2.
In a really large federation, where even the biggest is a significant minority, there is a constant power-play which occurs between these two groups to dominate the government. If there is one which is much larger, then it runs the risk of making it seem like it is dominated by one to the exclusion of the other, just like Czechoslovakia which was seen as just being a Czech creation. If a federation is really just a front for the domination of one group, such as the USSR with the Russians, or Yugoslavia with the Serbs, the same thing happens.
But if it is a federation where nobody is strong enough to be able to conceivable dominate it, and in Africa while there are some big ethnic groups, there wouldn't be any able to assume a plurality in the country, even for nations, then it could possibly help defuse such tensions by amalgamating them into the whole.

The European Union exists and it fields many supporters from the orders of suburban and urban retards user

They have enough trouble being Pan-Kenyan or Pan-Somalian or Pan-Congolese

>European union
>identity
try again retard.

>This is why a common African identity must be adopted after sufficient urbanization

If the whole thing requires cultural genocide to get off the ground, why not just cut to the chase and kill off the blacks and import Europeans instead?

>Pan Africanism
Ewww shit makes me want to vomit, i say LETS TAKE BACK WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY OURS (kinda of) !!
youtube.com/watch?v=b4eEnOQ29A0

Maybe we can let some modern day countries stay like Morocco, Egypt, Tunisia, South Africa and Liberia

>It is commonly easier to have a group of many of different people rather than 2.
Its hilarious when you bring Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia into this because they go contrary to your theory. The split of Czechoslovakia didn't happen trough a vote and there's no real animosity among the Czechs and Slovaks. Yugoslavia broke up via a plebiscite followed by several years of ethnic warfare. Neither was Yugoslavia dominated by Serbia, in fact, Serbs didn't even form a majority of the country so your attempt to align it with the situation in the USSR doesn't hold water. In fact it was the exact opposite with Serbs attempting, but failing, to increase centralization and concentrate power trough Serb led republics that lead to the break up of Yugoslavia. Literally how the last league of communists congress panned out with the Slovene delegation walking out, followed by the Croatian delegation, when the Serbian side outvoted every proposition and voted in their own.

Africa is diseased, rotten to the core. There's no saving it... we need to pull it out by the roots, wipe the slate clean, burn it down! And from the ashes a new Africa will be born! Evolved, but untamed! The weak will be purged, and the strongest will thrive, free to live as they see fit. They'll make Africa great again*!

>import Europeans instead
There is already a demographic deficit in Europe. I don't think there is any europeans to spare.

>find a flaw
75 average iq

Pan Africanism is a "probably not" kinda thing, but if South Africa sorts its shit out I could see them being the seed of a Bantu or Southern African federation: Namibia is an ex-territory of theirs and Zimbabwe's government is crumbling over time, it's entirely conceivable that both countries be integrated semi-peacefully with more following suit.

Yugoslavia was created by Serbia and the Serbs were at the heart of it. Just as you write, it was the opposition of the other republics to Serbia's central role at the heart, and its power from this role, which led to the breakup of Yugoslavia. The Czechs and the Slovaks didn't have animosity, but it was the same thing as with the dominating group in Yugoslavia : the domination of the Czechs meant that the Slovaks broke away from then. A federation without a single dominating member or a plurality avoids these issues.

iq is a fucking meme

"""""African""""" American autism has no place in Africa.

t. low IQ

IT isn't AA autism though despite your ignorance on that front.

Lol you are totally missing the point of the Rwandan genocide. IT wasn't a spontaneous thing but rather something that was field over like a century that was extremely heightened by Colombia polices that drew liens in the sand and the bad science of that period that justified those polices.

Pan-africanism isn't a "we all become one" thing.

really?

I don't need to

It is, though.
Only AAs that base their entire identity around having a high melanin count think all black people could get along. In reality, every African has a group of people that absolutely would not want to share a state with.

>Colombia polices
You what

>EU
>a functioning entity
>mfw

There's so much animosity and bad blood amongst the member nations it's a surprise that they can get anything done.

Give me a reason to believe you are genuine and not a cross poster and Ill give you a serious response