Why do Turks deal with the fact that they look nothing like their progenitors?

Why do Turks deal with the fact that they look nothing like their progenitors?

How do*

Well, the nationalist seems to deny it completely. Met a guy claiming these reconstruction were made by the Chinese to "discredit" them.

Were facial reconstructions basically just done in the Soviet Union?

We don't care what Mongolians/Gokturks looked like.
Our ancestors' ancestors mixed with Iranians centuries ago. Pic related is probably what Seljuks looked like, also in real life, no one cares about that shit. Only Amerimutts and birdshits do

also why do you birdshits even care about our history/genetics? if you knew anything about it then i'd be fine but you're just being retarded.

What are birdshits?

a word used against white people.

Mongolians and Gökturks aren't in any way the same entity.
In fact Mongols share a history with Turks but they aren't our ancestors, only some tribes stand in constant contact with Mongols.
Still we grew very close as a whole.

We don't know what the first Turks looked like.
Concluding from the consistency of the language and other cultural consistent factors and also clues scattered through the historic records tell us that Turks must very old and we know they expanded over and explored most of Eurasia.

In the nomadic Turks, these flowing masses of individuals, constantly moving, but not solely because of that, always clashing with the races ethnogenesis processes taking place on its various groups, with fluctuating genetic and hence phenotypic effects, a different approach from settler cultures', gets constructed when tying the Turkish identity to Turkish speaking populations because a different kind of self reflection has developed and hence view of the world.

Flows of migration take place in spirals and zig zags extending into the highest number of various cultures, languages, religions... over the largest surface area of the world historically and currently for any kind of nation ever existing, from the most central position of humankind with its semiotic, economic, cultural and genetic environment.
The Turkish self reflection is located in Tengrism, identity in Turkdom, the biological self identity is located in those.

...
So even such a question
>How do Turks deal with the fact that they look nothing like their progenitors?
comes off as a bit despicable to us because it shows little to no understanding of transcendental thought or multifactoral thinking, which seems to originate with us:

Tengrism, a completely scientific belief system, is the oldest form of theism thinkable, directly tied to the sky as it even survived in common perception to this day, developing hand in hand with the Turks as it is manifested inside and can be read out of their language and everyday philosophical approaches.

Heaven worship serves the navigation through time and space, in its most dense form emerging with nomads of the steppes, for them space-time navigation is most important. It's undoubtedly best preserved in the Turkic body along with its mythology which is tied to astronomical and other natural events (ie: Nardugan) and even displayed in their nomadic shelter, which gets aligned according to the cardinal directions and at times is understood as a ship. Further it's structured like a church or most other religious buildings.

The opening time dimension, from tying events to celestial phenomena (these are reliable and ever re-occuring, we can't think sophstciated time measurment without space), allows transcendental thought, which means 'that what extends personal to the ego confined space (in time included)' and increases survival likelihood. Survival is ensured by kut, what Turks call life force which is located in the sky, a leader, one who is best at navigating through time and space, is blessed with especially. All these factors combined; transcendental skills, and kut located in the heavens, leads to the conclusion that the leader is closer to Tengri, and its fleshly representation, ascended from the heavens.

Now you can understand why for Turks there's no problem of incorporating material matter from other peoples without giving up metaphysical self identity.

And to emphasize it again, the complete racial developments aren't known, if some of our populations have been mongolized or rather became Caucasian we don't know.

They could have been BLACK for all we know.

Isn't that that black entertaining guy?
That man looks black.

tiradı bumplama ak47 direkt sagele yazacaksan

Turkics are a racial clusterfuck to begin with.

Niyemis? Ve en önemli post'a linklemiyorsun, o da niye?

Not really, since natural selective forces were still pressuring them for long.
It's the individual tribes historical developments that experience mostly gradual racial shifts.

Unrelenting butthurt.
See below for evidence.

So basically the original Turks were blacks from Africa but migrated to Mongolia.
How did such a thing even happen?

>götüm yaniyooooor
Here's an absolutely neutrally formulated analysis of the matter in general terms:

>get called birdshit
>"UR UURRURU butthurt"
lmao birdshit
go die under a truck :DDDD

>were blacks
>were
that's where you're wrong homie.

Kürtmüsün nesin de burda kafa kiriyorsun?
Her neyse, helal olsun brehmin. Sik o kus sicmiklarini.

moruQ tiradı sagele deme sebebim trollerle falan uğraşmayalım o yüzdendi yazma demiyorum ama yazacaksan sagele ben de sageliyorum mesela.

By ceaselessly shitposting on this board about black bulls it seems

...

Honestly Tengrist, You are pretty swell guy.

if your genes fucked up by mixing other race you cannot call yourself as Turk. Even if you give a fez to a monkey you can't call him Turk.

you can't call it*

>wh*Te logic
lmao