Why is nazism legal in so many countries? It shouldn't be

Why is nazism legal in so many countries? It shouldn't be

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Darwinism#Germany
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Having thoughts shouldnt be legal?

It's the most vile ideology in all of human history and those believing in it belong in a mental asylum

What about it is particularly vile?

Nazism as practiced by the Nazis isn't legal anywhere there is a modern constitution since they routinely violate the rule of law.

Advocating for it is legal but you'd need 80% of Americans on board with replacing our Constitution. Good luck.

>most vile ideology in all of human history
By what metric? "most vile" strikes me as an awfully subjective term, I for example would say that communism is much worse and has done more harm to humanity than the Nazis ever did.

You most be awfully right wing to even have to ask that question
From an ideological standpoint nazism is much worse

Not him, but maybe it's the fact that nazism ultimately demands the genocide of all other "races"

sauce?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Darwinism#Germany

Something to get rid of undesireables within the German race like retards and fags, if you think Hitler wanted to genocide every non german on the planet you're drinking too much post war cool aid.

Not him but the desire to kill just one group of people based on something as arbitrary as ¨race¨ is fucking retarded

Not who you're responding to but the murder of the physically and mentally disabled, as well as homosexuals, is morally reprehensible and indefensible.

In Hitlers world view, "races" were locked in an evolutionary fight for living space and survival. So maybe he didn't "want" to kill every other race, but in his world view, sooner or later any two different races would compete for living space, and the stronger race would survive while the weaker one wouldn't

No it's not. In fact killingn on the basis of ethnicity/race has underpinned politics since the beginning of time.

No it's not. There is nothing wrong with killing homosexuals or the disabled. In fact keeping them alive is morally reprehensible.

Why is socialism, marxism and communism legal?

Bait, or a self-hating homosexual

National socialism is just fascism with added biological element to its militant nationalism.

It's as morally reprehensible as aborting them (the mentally retarded, not sure about fags though some definitely deserve it for being such fags) really, as long as it's done "humanely" with as little pain as possible post-birth eugenics isn't all that bad, and shouldn't be in the eyes of today's western society.

If we put communist in it I would agree. I mean why would the state allow an ideology that is against everything he represents and wants to destroy him

>Everyone thought that way in the past
>Therefore its a logical way to think today
Nazi ¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨logic¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨ everyone

>National socialism is just fascism
whoa wtf really

Why is the murder of homosexuals and the disabled the ultimate moral litmus test?

Almost 100 million people died directly or indirectly as a result of Hitler's actions. And you're here whining about homosexuals and the disabled.

You couldn't be more reddit even if you tried.

None of that is an argument.

>everything that threatens the dominance of liberal democracy in a liberal democratic state should be banned and persecuted with impunity
nice free speech ya got there, suppressing all dissenting voices that aren't impotent

>Nazism is the most vile ideology even though it was basically an extension of everything that came before it
Yawn. You're boring.

At the end of the day Nazism is perfectly mundane.

Non-vegetative handicapped people can still live happy and fulfilling lives. Take a poll among disabled people and I'm sure you'll find few that aren't content with their lives. Ask a similar question of the mentally disabled and you'll get similar answers. Many (though not all) can even find gainful employment: what's keeping a paraplegic from working in an office environment, or teaching at a university? What's keeping someone with mental retardation from being a janitor or wal-mart greeter?

>Bad thing A happened that was worse than bad thing B, so if you say bad thing B was also bad then you're ignoring bad thing A

This is the most childish shit I've heard all day.

>Not who you're responding to but the murder of the physically and mentally disabled, as well as homosexuals, is morally reprehensible and indefensible.
Do morals exist or not leftypol? You can't have your spooks and be a cultural relativist at the same time

Fuck are you talking about, man. All I'm saying is that killing people for being different and/or handicapped is fucked.

Yes, communism is fucked.

Communist parties are banned in some Eastern-European nations

I completely agree.

And openly praised in western European countries. It's almost like those who experienced communism wants nothing to do with it.

It always comes back to communism with you faggots doesn't it.

No, moralizing against the Nazis for their murders of the handicapped and homosexuals as particularly morally vile or unique is childish. Let's not even get into the fact the eugenics was simply all the rage in the western world all over and that even the english sterilized homosexuals well after the war. The Dutch run euthanasia programs for the mentally ill and the handicapped to this day and the Swedes practiced eugenics well into the late 70s.

Feeling sheepish yet?

>Fuck are you talking about, man. All I'm saying is that killing people for being different and/or handicapped is fucked.
>stirner.jpg
Explain to how this suits my self-interests?

Triggered commie detected.

Handicapped people are a heavy burden on their families that can be easily dealt with in the womb or at birth when it's definite that they'll be so for the rest of their lives, complications with their situation often leads them to an early death as well, cultures in the past that exposed them to the elements knew all this, and with our modern systems of social interdependence today handicaps become a problem for society and not just the poor family that gets the short straw. Whether they can achieve a "happy" life for themselves content to clean tables at McDonalds is irrelevant to what they put others through throughout their lives, the extra effort expended on them, that can all be avoided early on in their lives or before they're born through eugenics.

I know it's a meme, but modern communists are not real communists.

Isn't that the same logic that they use to say nazism is ilegal.
"We shouldn't tolerate the intolerant " I mean the state should do it either.
Well ban both or let the two continue

I said that just to prove you had an awful logic. Nazism is actually more extreme than anything before.

Very few people wanted to straight up exterminate the people they saw as inferior, the nazis did however

It's in the interests of liberal democracies to do so, both are a threat, nazism just gets the spotlight because of historical circumstance, hence all the faux patriotism you see with liberals referencing captain america and indiana jones killin dem deyer nawtsiz

Yeah, unlike plain old murder that's not morally reprehensible and indefensible.

You dumb tard

Nazism wasn't a real ideology. Nazism, or rather Hitlerism was nothing more but few incoherent ideas of a failed artist.
"Real" national socialism died in 1934 and never achieved anything.

strasser's ghost is very butthurt I see

No not really. My only qualm was the post earlier saying Hitler "only" wanted to exterminate undesirables from the German race, not all races in the world.

Eugenics is Eugenics no matter where it's done. Though not in and of itself morally reprehensible, killing people you consider undesirable for no other reason than being undesirable pretty much is. I'm aware other nations were interested in or involved in Eugenics at some point, much as I am aware that other nations were involved in other shitty things like slavery, corruption, repression etc. throughout history.

Abortions are a gray area for me. I really don't care if you abort a fetus for being potentially handicapped. Killing children, teenagers, adults, etc. however is wrong.

Furthermore, society now is better able to support handicapped individuals than it has ever been. Go find the families of handicapped people, and ask them if they feel they would be happier without their handicapped relative. Some people may not be able to handle such burdens but most are fully able to love and provide for their crippled kin. Your inability to does not imply *their* inability to.

Exactly. Murder is murder is murder.

That's why hilarity ensues. All these retard commies today would be the first ones sent to Gulag.

>Abortions are a gray area for me.
Love it, simply love it.

How is murdering someone with a mental disability that essentially makes him unable to function without constant care immoral but 'aborting' (can't use murder) a healthy fetus morally acceptable or "in the gray area"?

Homosexuals aren't people and retards are too, well, retarded to understand what's happening to them.

>It's the most vile ideology in all of human history and those believing in it belong in a mental asylum
That's freedom for you. Don't like it, move to a country that doesn't have any, such as North Korea.