What's the obsession with Vikings?

They're over-glorified savages.
>inb4 muh long boats
>inb4 muh America """""colonies""""
Savages that have a cool piece of technology are still savages.

>savages
that word doesn't mean as much as you think it does

>t. savage

This. Only non-whites can be savages

They were better than south europeans though.

I think it has to do with Norse Mythology, their daring in exploration (sailing in open water was largely unheard of before them), their artwork including their longboats ("but muh inb4!"), etc.

....what?

They used to be hipster compared to greek or egyptian mythology. The mythology of bad dudes. Today they're even more mainstream than those but it already gained momentum and can survive just by attracting manchildren thanks to how widely available is the basic info.

Also I think the "MUH BEARD" fad has something to do with it.

This but unironically

There's plenty of other more interesting groups having beards. That doesn't justify it.

This but unironically being unironic

>sailing in open water was largely unheard of before them
Neck yourself

It's a good thing that normies obsess over a shitty civilisation because it prevents better ones from being ruined by the normie taint.

what is china

kek

This.

>What's the obsession with WEE KANGZ?

its just some Americucks

what the fuck are you doing, sand nigger?
you are still butthurt

what the fuck

Well the muh beard thing is also a hipster thing

Not really.

t. Euro

its just some butthurt sand nigger

They were aesthetic as fuck, their religion was comfy and they put entire Europe into a constant state of terror for almost 300 years.

What's not to like? I realize you're all fucking hipsters so the main reason why you hate them is because they're popular right now in tv, books and movies so now you think they're gay. You're the exact same people that a few years ago despised the Spartans.

Just because something is popular doesn't necessarily bad.

>Just because something is popular doesn't necessarily make it bad.

He's right though.

>implying vikings could even conquer any land besides part of shit covered subroman britain
>implying anyone besides the weak subroman britbongs gave a shit
yeah ok buddy

>proud to be historically illiterate
why?

>Brought civilization to Ireland and Eastern Europe
>Founded great cities in Ireland, England and Rus
>Last bastion of European democracy
>Wrote the Sagas
>Created rich trade routes
>Defended the Roman emperor from getting backstabbed by treacherous Greeks

>B-but they stole from people!!!