They are underdeveloped because they didn't have access to natural resources

>They are underdeveloped because they didn't have access to natural resources.

>They are underdeveloped because they had too many natural resources (resource curse, kek)

>They are underdeveloped because oil, diamonds, and literal gold aren't useful to a developing society

>They are underdeveloped because of a fly.

What will libtards come up with next?

>What will libtards come up with next?
Eurangatangs were superior to the Incas.

>they are underdeveloped because they live too comfortably

They are underdeveloped because they have no reason to develop. Europeans built houses to protect themselves from weather, whereas Africans don't need to worry about that in an equatorial climate. Agriculture developed in the Fertile Crescent because of burgeoning populations and lessening resources to hunter and gather, whereas Africans populations remained relatively stable and resources never dwindled. They didn't develop societies more complex than tribal because the abundance of resources didn't force the stratification of the tribes into rigid upper and lower classes.

Their environment simply did not present challenges for them to solve.

>this thread again

Where's Mr. "Why are you anti-white"?

>Their environment simply did not present challenges for them to solve.

Are you fucking retarded mate?

1. What the hell is she smuggling in her pants?

2. Using this logic, explain why Eskimos, sherpas, and steppe people didn't develop bustling advances

>They are underdeveloped because they had too many natural resources
Access to a lot of natural resources and little else is more likely to destabilise a country. Since you don't need a lot of skilled labour to dig rocks out of the ground, there's no incentive to build infrastructure like schools and hospitals, making the land more appealing to tyrant regimes. Notice how most countries where oil is a primary export, turn massive profits but have very low quality of life.

>Their environment simply did not present challenges for them to solve.

Can we ban Africa shitposters already?

>he creates the same thread every day
>he claims to be superior because he's white
>yet he can only feel superior by creating the same thread over and over again in a Somalian pirate vessel trading board

Well for one there wasnt much evolutionary pressure to adapt societies more complex than hunter gatherers since africa is the place humans are adapted to survive in
Secondly unlike snowniggers they couldnt just steal arabs invention of cultivatable grain because its too jot to grow grain in subsaharan africa so they had to actually find their own clutivatable form of carbs, yams, but this left them like 3000 years behind everyone else
Thirdly they were actually as developed as europe for a lot of the middle ages, but then the slave trade started which was obviously their own mistake but it drained the population and prevented development because you could just buy manufactored goods with slave money rather than learning to make them themselves
Fourtly, and perhaps most importantly, in the process of colonizing africa europeans annihilated most advanced civilisations there at the time
Fifthly once the colonizers had left they basically had to build modern states from next to nothing
Finally the economy of africa totally collased in the 90s thanls to neoliberal economic policies forced on them by the world bank meaning almost all growth that hat had been achieved was wiped out

>Soft drink concentrates

Lel

untapped goldmine mate

Better question is will they ever catch up?

2. Too many challenges? Doesn't it make sense that there is an optimal amount of challanges? Where you develope to overcome them, but it's forgiving enough that you get to experiment?

Bump

>this is hard to survive in

>but this is a paradise with plentiful resources and good weather
unironically off yourself, there were plenty of pre-colonial kingdoms and agricultural states in Africa that had gone beyond being hunter gatherers

...

They're underdeveloped because of poor climate and unstable political climates

>le everything in Africa is a dense jungle or desert meme
Guess how I know you're all Americans who have never been to Africa? This isn't even about ideology, you faggots are uneducated and clueless about basic geography and biomes.

>he thinks Lesotho is "African"

Kek

>everything in Africa is a dense jungle, desert, *or genocide
Corrected.

My bad faggot I forgot Lesotho is somewhere between Oklahoma and Nebraska.

this is literally in Cambodia

>steppe people didn't develop bustling advances
CHARIOTS
H
A
R
I
O
T
S

For the purposes of
This discussion

Africa is everywhere but north, south, east, and west Africa.

>1. What the hell is she smuggling in her pants?