At Tehran Conference, Stalin proposed executing 50,000–100...

>At Tehran Conference, Stalin proposed executing 50,000–100,000 German officers so that Germany could not plan another war. Roosevelt, believing Stalin was not serious, joked that "maybe 49,000 would be enough". Churchill, however, was outraged and denounced "the cold blooded execution of soldiers who fought for their country". He said that only war criminals should be put on trial in accordance with the Moscow Document, which he himself had written. He stormed out of the room, but was brought back in by Stalin who said he was joking. Churchill was glad Stalin had relented, but thought Stalin was testing the waters.[11]

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

The wrong people won the war.

Based Churchill

>losers should win

>t. loser

The stupid capitalists can't even understand jokes, no wonder the war took so long

>Based Churchill
Based Eisenhower

>being butthurt over a cheeky joke
baka Churchill

...

>brit sissies can't handle the banter

How were they gonna plan a war when their country was chopped into bits and demilitarized? Clearly Stalin was joking.

>a man that's literally dying can handle the banter better than churchill

He was definitely not joking, but he WAS right. Not only G*rm officers, but ALL G*RMS, should have been put to death.

Churchill didn´t stand to be sober for a 1 hour meeting, that´s why he was so touchy in this occasion

Churchill was a beta and felt nervous whenever met with Chad Stalin

>Churchill starves 2 million people during war
>Firebombs cities rather than focus on production like Americans.
>Suddenly needs a safe space

we should have do that after ww1

>Roosevelt, believing Stalin was not serious

Just another example of what a shitty president that crippled fuck was.

This. It was just an Anglo mind trick

ABSOLUTELY PERFIDIOUS

Just Churchill being a pussy
Also reminder that if Stalin wanted to, he could implement this plan without any trouble, he had plenty of PoWs and there was not anyone to stop or control him
Obviously a lot of Germans PoW did not survive but unlike Russian PoWs in Germany there are no signs of deliberate cleansing

not sure it was a joke, it wasnt like the russians werent willing to execute captured enemy officers en masse in a attempt to reduce future resistance

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre

> implying that Stalin did a thing wrong

>Churchhill constantly stating he wanted to kill germans
>suddenly trying to look good for PR
disgusting

>british people
>good at banter

fucking exposed

>He thought Stalin was testing the waters
obviously, it wouldnt be the first or second time he massacred officers

A guy who okayed the firebombing of Dresden suddenly getting asshurt of someone else murdering Germans?

He did many things wrong, like purging the fuck out of his military then wondering why the Red Army was getting the shit kicked out of it early in the war. I really don't understand all of the pro-Stalinist viewpoints on Veeky Forums.

...

based

>defeating anti-soviet wreckers trying to tear down the socialist motherland is now a mistake

>Churchill, however, was outraged and denounced "the cold blooded execution of soldiers who fought for their country"
This from some cunt who deliberately stole grain from indians and starved millions to death not even due to lack of grain for the British, but just to bolster the reserves of its food grain.

He is a fucking douche.

He was a malevolent psychopath who murder tens of millions but in his desire to exterminate G*rms he was /ourguy/

This, Stalin was still right though, Krauts don't deserve life

Stop replying to the leftytards.

just another Whi*Te

What is wrong with starving Indians? No food means no poo

When Indians take a shit it stays in their streets away from everyone else. When Germans take a shit it engulfs the entire continent in flames.

go back to /mlp/

>Roosevelt, believing Stalin was not serious, joked that

Actually, when germans take a shit it ends on the mouth

theres nothing wrong with killing germans
they lost the war

Stalin was an actual alpha male.

that never actually happened.

bengal had relied on rice imports from burma for decades, the harvest failed, burma was occupied by japan and shipping was problematic at best. sure he didnt care about the famine, but he didnt create it

Why did Stalin love executing military officers so much? Was he cucked by one?

Germania delenda est

The bad guys won the first war
The good guys won the second war

...

he was an autist getting upset over some sick bants.

>Stalin's hospitality was renowned for involving large quantities of alcohol and he preferred negotiating with heavy drinkers.

>"What Stalin made me drink seemed pretty savage: Winston, who by that time was complaining of a slight headache, seemed wisely to be confining himself to a comparatively innocuous effervescent Caucasian red wine."

>The anglos starve millions of indians
Nothing wrong here
>Stalin wants to execute evil g*rms
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE fucking dictator

>The British possibly killed in excess of 20,000 Mau Mau militants,[3] but in some ways more notable is the smaller number of Mau Mau suspects dealt with by capital punishment: by the end of the Emergency, the total was 1,090. At no other time or place in the British empire was capital punishment dispensed so liberally—the total is more than double the number executed by the French in Algeria.