Wars are fought over resources

>wars are fought over resources
What are some other widely inaccurate buzz-phrases you are tired of hearing brainlets spout?

Nazism is not Socialism due to Hitler's speeches

It's not socialism because it defends private property

>wars are fought over ideology

Go back to bed, brainlet.

>he isn’t a geographical determinist
Read a book

>geographical determinism has nothing to do with local resource control

You first.

No it didn't. Nazism is just another form of Socialism.

"These Nazi radicals think of nothing except ‘distributing the wealth,'” while some businessmen were “studying Marxist theories, so that they will have a better understanding of the present economic system."

Bump

Sage

Add something

...

>source

Also, they were about as 'socialist' as the PRC is today, which is to say they were state capitalists in all but name. Corporate cartels run by government cronies dominated the economy.

Why did "Socialist" Nazis purge all the Communists and Socialists from their party in the early '30s?

Then what else makes organisms kill each other?

you arrogant little fuck , you know damn well there was resource wars

>wars aren't fought over economic interests

Hitler hated corporations

>Nazis are left wing

Because they wanted to be the only socialists around

/argument. Brainlet got told.

Only those which competed with the ones who supported him financially

After Schatch was removed from his post in 1937 the Nazis went full socialist.

>Reichswerke built state-owned aluminum plants, steel mills, arms factories, consumer goodd factories
>4-year-plans just like in the Soviet Union
>Göering was given sweeping authority over German industry, including the power to nationalize industries, set price controls, or execute people for vague crimes such as "hoarding"* and "economic sabotage"

* "Hoarding" is a typical problem of socialist economies, where price controls create breadlines and a scarcity of goods (nobody wants to sell at a loss) just like in modern Venezuela.

what movie is that?

(you)

You are dumb as fuck. Please do everyone a favor and kill yourelf.

>resources are ever important to a state

What a fucking retard.

Fascist socialism was based on Syndicalism- one industry being controlled by its worker and its organization (the buisness the Nazi's would give full power). Mussolini was originally a hard syndicalist before he expanded his idea.

>resources are not important to a state

Not to Germany.

>states alone drive human history
Top zozzle.

I'm not OP. There are wars fought over resources and there are wars for other motives. The problem happens when people think all wars are over resources. I have seen an idiot argue that the Crusades were about opening trade routes for merchants. Because obviously, an 11th century noble would spend a large amount of money to die of dysentery in a scorching desert thousands of kilometers away from his realm for the well being of merchants.

The knights and spoldiers obviously have other motives then the ones that are leading the war

>socialism abolished private property
So the German socialists of early 19th century weren't socialists because they had private property?

>state capitalism isn't socialism
So I guess soviet Russia wasn't actually soviet controlled

>why did people remove their opposition
The only reason the catholic centre sided with hitler was because it was iconoclast communists otherwise

>state capitalism
>planned economy

>implying Nazis aren't centrists ergo BASED

>workers literally seize factories from their rightful owners
>not at least socialism if not communism

please stop, you're embarrassing yourself.

>economic interferance and big gov is leftist, the right-wing is about economic freedom
t. Historically illiterate burgers

Workers dosn't control the factories in China tho

Yes?

They don't, but they sure have weight when it comes to war.

The nobles WERE the ones leading the war.

And who do you imagine was leading the crusades?

Who are these people like OP? Where do they come from, what, /pol/?
I remember this board being half decent when it started up, now it looks like stereotypical fucking basement dwellers trying to seem smart

>he doesn't know about red meat

It's a bunch of shitposting contrarians who just try to start bait threads. So they could be from /v/, /sp/, /tv/, /int/, /pol/, etc. Unfortunately most boards are infested with this kind of low-energy shitposting and it would be foolish to ascribe one board to it.

But they did in Russia during the civil war

>/pol/lacks could be from /pol/
Ya don't say
/pol/ is mainly made up of redditors now, all spouting outdated memes trying to fit in and then making their own shitty one

Not an argument

>merchants and businessmen have always controlled everything, and never been controlled by aristocracy who looked down on them, because they were aristocracy

Source

So you have gold and I have steel and there is nobody else around.

so why do they come here

Stop being fucking retarded

>People are still too stupid to understand that fascism is a mixture between keynsian and syndicalist economic models
Why does everything have to be either socialism or capitalism among brainlets

>Being this much of a moron when it comes to the Overton Window
Capitalism is right wing , the colloquial meaning of right wing means free market capitalism. Is capitalism reactionary? Not really on an objective level, but it is on a contemporary level.

brainlet threads need their authors to gtfo this planet

>Implying Nazi Economics was anything remotely like Keynesian and syndicalist economic models

Wrong retard.

>The anti-business motives behind the Nationalist Socialists have been attributed to the Nazi leadership’s aim “to soak the rich and ‘neutralize big spenders,’” since they harbored “hostility towards the wealthy." The National Socialists were also hostile to trade associations and small corporations. Hitler’s administration decreed an October 1937 policy that “dissolved all corporations with a capital under $40,000 and forbade the establishment of new ones with a capital less than $200,000,” which swiftly affected the collapse of one-fifth of all small corporations.

The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany

>Implying Nazi Economics was not anything remotely like Keynesian and syndicalist economic models

>Hitler hated corporations
>Which is why he literally centralized corporations under a nationalized workforce
Sometimes I wonder why I bother posting here. Brainlets here, brainlets there, it's just sad.

Because they're already on Veeky Forums and decide they need to use every board

>quality posts by poltards without a clue on the subjects

>Everyone who is conservative needs to leave my board reeeeeee

>forcibly disbands hundreds of competitors to the industrialists which supported the Nazis
Seems like you've proved my point

Anyone who posts brainlet wojacks are the real idiots.

Pro-tip it wasn't

This must be the worst thread I've ever seen, even Why Do Africans Suck #4980 was better

Why do people think of gubernment giving gibs when they hear socialism, unless you abolish mass commodity production for exchange instead of use, your production will still be restricted by the SNLT and thus profit will show up and workers will be exploited, its not as simple as government owning industries and shit, even Hitler didn't give two shits about the economic aspect of his party, the socialism part died with Strasser in the night of the long knives

pretty bad argument aside from the multiyear plans; what you're describing is a war-time economy

>forces agglutination of corporate wealth
>creates nation-size wartime corps
>crushes any worker influence (re: union and previous leadership/ownership)
you're a fucking brainlet bud

this is literally all you brainlets do whenever you're called out for NOT HAVING AN OPINION: you sound a whistle and green text. There's never an argument

>What are some other widely inaccurate buzz-phrases you are tired of hearing brainlets spout?

People (ITT even) arguing about what socialism is

Pro tip: it was

>black egyptians
gets me everytiem. afrocentrism is cultural appropriation.
>_____ just like the nazis!
godwins law dictates our society these days. nothing compares to the fucking nazis, except nazis.
>KKK was created by democrats lol
if I have to explain how the parties switched labels one more fucking time I swear to god...

You know what's worse? Arguing about whether a white-ethnostate is nazism because it most certainly is.

How
A homogenous society is Nazi?
Those fucking Nazis in Africa. Why don't they accept white peppel?

America's founders where the original nazis?
What about non-whites? Is Japan a nazi government?

Cultural Marxism.

>Communism is good idea, it's just that human nature is too flawed for it to work

My teacher told me that the crusades were started by the church to reduce the European population since they were getting out of hand...

>

your teacher is literally retarded if he actually believes that

Did u just assume gender

Communism is a bad idea because human nature is too flawed for it to work

yeah forgot to include a key word: creating a white ethnostate

Mubutism is so great, and South Africa is also similarly doing great. Ethnostates are fascism founded upon racism, and it is pretty simple that they analogous to nazis

>a country that remains an ethnicity is racist
Probably racist, but if they aren't actively removing the other ethnicities through their governments then no they aren't literal Nazis yet.

>conflating
>america's founders
Did they wage war on the natives for decades? Some of them were active participants and the government they founded also participated in that genocide, so yeah they're evil. I wouldn't call them Nazis because it wasn't the Ethnicity of the natives, but the fact they occupied 'America' at the time (anyone would have been slaughtered).

>Japan
Clearly a racist country, but they aren't actively purging their country of expats they just pressure them into leaving by making it nearly impossible to get through the bureaucratic red tape. Honestly that's a much more humane working solution than stripping citizens of their rights etc etc

but yeah Slavery was so rife in the rich that most of them were probably hardline racists. You did have people like Benjamin Franklin and Dr Johnston around, but by and far society accepted slavery

>Honestly that's a much more humane working solution than stripping citizens of their rights etc etc

LOL their prisons for expats and migrants is a complete third world esque nightmare. Hell unlike most nations that kick you out ASAP Japan keeps you for your sentence and writes you off as number if you just so happen to die./commit suicide.

That applies to every system.

Stop obssessing over Hoteps

>Those fucking Nazis in Africa. Why don't they accept white peppel?

White propel can migrate easy to Africa though. You just don't have a motherland babying you in the literally manner that the term "nanny state" (which is a total meme desu) could accurately be attributed too.

Capitalists call nazism socialist

Socialist call it capitalist


huh....maybe it was a third position...

It's NATIONAL socialism, retards

>history is his story

the parties never switched labels. You had Whites in the South (mostly in Appalachia) who always supported republicans.

You'd think by now people would have realized that the Nazi's were really wishy-washy on what they wanted to do with their economy because of their hatred of both capitalism and marxism.

Just because you put national in front of a word does not make it National. I.e National Communism

>destroyed smaller business's to funnel investment into giga corps
>"no guys, see, he hated ALL corporations!"
Very very very intelligent post user