How did the Anglos BTFO the entire planet is less than 400 years?

How did the Anglos BTFO the entire planet is less than 400 years?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglicisation_of_names#German_surnames
names.mongabay.com/data/black.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servitude
youtube.com/watch?v=7V_oT1_YQ58
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Back then everyone who wasn't a deist thought that

>island nation protected by its seas
>naval tradition
>innovation and invention
>strong emphasis on settler colonialism

These allowed Britain to colonise North America and establish a solid foundation for a nation state (compare with French Louisiana). The colonies rebelled and continued to create a prosperous nation-state which was even more unthreatened than Britain itself was.

Britain went on to be instrumental in the defeat of its main rival (France) in the early 1800s and established the Pax Britannica, which laid the foundation for Anglo-Saxon culture (including common law, which 1/3 of the world population now uses) and the English language becoming well-known across the world. The USA picked up the Anglo standard and carries it to this day.

Explain how did they "BTFO" the whole planet?
>y-you speak English
Avoid that brainlet argument.

Anglos hold more power over the world than any single cultural group has done ever.

Only if you consider Americans (who are a mix of Germans and Irish) as Anglos
Brits are irrelevant

Something about WW2 destroying every single other countries domestic industry except the US

They didn't. They only BTFO for 100-120 years, which isn't that long and not the top score by any measure.

No, they don't. Romans or Chinese held more power for example, in their parts of the contemporary world.
Furthermore "Anglos" is a ridiculous term in this case, because your argument hinges on USA, and USA is USA. It's not an extended arm of UK, or even a part of the Commonwealth. In fact they went against UK several times, and "special relationship" is just a meme, and most of Americans aren't Anglo, and their culture evolved, despite still having Anglo roots.
Not even the Commonwealth is some tightly-knit group.
British (Anglo) power is mostly gone since WW2.

The USA is historically dominated by WASPs and its cultural background is Anglo-Saxon, so yes, it is Anglo.

And we are talking about the last few centuries here - the largest empire ever to exist is hardly 'irrelevant'.

The USA is historically dominated by JEWS and its cultural background is JEWS, so yes, it is JEWISH

>historically dominated
"Historically". Not anymore.
>it is Anglo
No it's not, majority of them don't really feel like Anglos. They feel American, and some of them feel like something else in addition.
>largest empire
Largest sure, but most of it was Africa.

>in their parts of the contemporary world
>not the whole world

OK buddy

>USA is USA. It's not an extended arm of UK

England was the cultural mother of the United States, and Englishness is its default culture. That's why you get German-Americans, Irish-Americans, African-Americans, and so on, but no English-Americans.In 2000, the US Census Bureau reported that the top ten most common names were, in order,

Smith, Johnson, Williams, Brown, Jones, Miller, Davis, Garcia, Rodriguez, and Wilson. Eight of these are British.

USA hasn't been dominated by the WASPs since 20th century began. Anglo America was an irrelevant shithole on par with Canada, it was German immigration that made America a great superpower.

Largest ancestry of White European descended Americans are "White Americans" i.e. Anglo-Saxon/English/British colonists and then English-Americans. After that its Germans, and the Irish are nothing close to the German-Americans in terms of numbers.

Germans are the largest group.

I'm not sure what those cityfolk on /pol/ do with their claims but in our town we like our statements to be factual.

This.

>Largest sure, but most of it was Africa.

We're talking about how Anglos 'BTFO'd the world world' (not OP here).

Ruling over a quarter of the world population and having sigificant informal imperial control over yet more of it is pretty close to BTFO'ing it imo

How did germans nearly BTFO the entire planet in less than 4?

Due to technology of that period as well as human settlement it was literally "the whole world" for them.
Keep in mind Rome conquered powerful entities, like Carthage, various Hellenic states, Gaul...England conquered India. That's it. And I'm being generous here, India as whole was far more backward compared to Europe at that time.
>England was the cultural mother
Maybe in early 19th century.
>Englishness is the default culture
Americans tend to disagree and their opinions are far more relevant than your delusions.
>top 10 surnames
Many of Smiths and Millers are no doubt Anglicized.

I think there are people who claim to be English-American. Also those names don't mean anything a lot of Germans anglicised their names

>muh surnames
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglicisation_of_names#German_surnames

>"the whole world" for them
>and yet not actually the whole world

really jogs my noggin

>Keep in mind Rome conquered powerful entities, like Carthage, various Hellenic states, Gaul...England conquered India. That's it.

Also Imperial China, about half of Africa, and had a big hand in defeating Napoleon and Hitler, but sure.

Rome definitely had a more powerful military but that's not the only important thing in world power/influence.

>Many of Smiths and Millers are no doubt Anglicized.
>Germans anglicised their names

How do you retards not see the irony of what you're saying? If immigrants literally had to ANGLIcize their names that proves that Anglo culture is the default.

>Anglo culture is the default
Anglo culture, not Anglo genes/ancestry. Michael Fassbender is half German and half Irish and he looks like a textbook white American despite not even being American. Meanwhile the typical Anglo faces like John Lennon or Liam Gallagher basically don't exist in America.

Nice way to shift the goalposts.

Even if we were to take that line of argument, it's still patently false. In the 1980 United States Census, over 49 million (49,598,035) Americans claimed English ancestry, at the time around 26.34% of the total population and largest reported group which, even today, would make them the largest ethnic group in the United States.

The numbers do not agree with your 'muh facial features' argument.

They were shopkeepers.

When the conquistadors trod virgin soil they dreamt of creating their own little fiefdom, the hacienda. The Anglo on the other hand was looking for something to put in his shop window. Teak, spices, opium, cashmere wool, anything that might be sold to anyone anywhere in the world, the Anglo would find a way to get it and a way to sell it. Once the trade was there they wanted as much as possible as cheaply as possible, a trailblazing Anglo could obtain loans and investments many times greater than the value of the commodity they found such that a mere tea leaf might look like glistening gold to them. They would sink their roots deep into a country with a single minded purpose, enticing natives along the way and gradually subverting entire societies as their economy bent itself towards the Anglo's will.

Nothing was ever enough, no country could isolate itself enough to stop it. Their attitude mystified many whomst were met with seemingly unending avarice and perfidy. In reality it was just an economic calculation, a very efficient one which reached down into the lowest levels and directed resources towards the highest growth as determined by a multitude of merchants searching every possible avenue for profit, all supported by the Anglo financial system.

What did the red devils want? The higher ups wanted bigger numbers on a piece of paper. Others wanted to afford a jellied eel, pie and mash shop to impress Muriel or some other small dream. It was all sanitized, just a job, we just want tea.

>Smith

>Johnson

>Brown

>Davis

We're talking about the dominant culture here.

>Wilson
etc.

>germans trying to steal Anglo glory
Get the fuck outta here, we dominate the globe, not you fuckers

names.mongabay.com/data/black.html
You get the idea now. According to you the most "Anglo" people in the US are the niggers.

They adopted those names because Anglo culture is dominant in the US and the elites were (and to some extent are) primarily Anglos.

You don't get people of European ancestry adopting N'gumbe as a surname.

>Britain (Anglo): a hasbeen
>Canada (Anglo): irrelevant shithole
>Australia (Anglo): irrelevant shithole
>New Zealand (Anglo): irrelevant shithole
>USA (German): actually relevant country
Hmm notice the pattern?

So American niggers are Anglos now?

USA (Anglo) you mean?

Not what I'm saying is it? American culture is dominated by Anglo-Saxon culture. It has obviously evolved and changed, but that was its foundation.

As a result America should be considered a primarily Anglo country.

See

"In the 2014 American Community Survey, English Americans are (7.6%) of the total population. However, demographers regard this as a serious undercount, as the index of inconsistency is high, and many, if not most, people from English stock have a tendency (since the introduction of a new "American" category (See Old Stock Americans) in the 2000 census) to identify as simply Americans or if of mixed European ancestry, identify with a more recent and differentiated ethnic group."

Genetics are what matters. Culture is superficial, Trinidad and Jamaica are "culturally Anglo" by your logic but they're still fucking crapholes since they're full of niggers.

>Genetics are what matters. Culture is superficial

You have a containment board for a reason

The self designed "Americans" in the Appalachians might be of English ancestry, not coincidentally it's also the shittiest, poorest, fattest and dumbest region of the entire nation.

>it's also the shittiest, poorest, fattest and dumbest region of the entire nation.

I'd always thought this was the Midwest or the South.

>culture is all that matters, all success is due to culture, genetics are irrelevant
>it's a just a coincidence that Jamaica is a shithole and Germanic areas of the US are rich and developed even though both have "Anglo culture"

Appalachia overlaps with both.

Maybe because one was basically a massive slave plantation that was left to its own devices, whilst the other had the benefit of hundreds of years of development?

Nah that's too nuanced

That would be all the regions with a high concentration of Germans. Appalachia is full of Irishmen anyways.

New England and Utah are all basically pure Anglo, and has the highest concentration of them.

>he actually thinks his bullshit is nuanced
my sides

>midwest
>Rich and developed
By your logic Jews are the ubermenschen

>New England and Utah are all basically pure Anglo
Maybe those tiny statelets like Vermont and New Hampshire are still Anglo, but most of New England is mixed nowadays. Maine is like half French, Connecticut is full of whatever NYC washed out, urban centers are mixed as fuck (Boston is Irish/Italian/black, Hartford and New Haven are both full of blacks, etc).
You might be correct about Utah though, no wonder they're such complete crackpots there.

Midwest actually is rich and developed. Lowest crime rates, highest IQs, lowest unemployment, etc. Not coincidentally the only garbage parts of the Midwest are places like southern Indiana or southern Ohio where there's tons of Anglo redneck blood around.

how did we get BTFO by anglos, retard?

You seem out of touch. Let me explain it to you in a way you can understand. America controls the entire planet and literally does whatever the fuck it wants 24/7. No one else even comes close. Anglos (whites) created the most powerful entity that has ever been.

Now, they're getting SPIC'd and POO'd.

are you allowed to do whatever the fuck you want 24/7? can you get away with anything without getting arrested? don't think so

>who are a mix of Germans and Irish) as Anglos
This is a load of shit and you know it.
Back in the eighties, British was the single biggest census category, bigger than both Irish and German, at over 25%. What happened since then? Did we have a huge influx of Krauts and Micks? And huge expulsion of our Brits? No, we added the "American" category. And many old settler-descendants, ones who had been here since the foundation of this nation, checked that.
Also, even then, I'd estimate that an even larger portion of the populace who are mainly British-American check an other box on the census. Why? Because they feel closer to some more recent member of the family. For example, if one has a German grandmother, and otherwise stretches back to 1680 with only British roots, that person would be likely to check German, since that's the closest contact to foreign culture he has, as British-American culture simply evolved into American culture.
For example, my mother is 1/4 Swedish, and is otherwise completely old-stock English-American, but she checks Swedish on any census.
Personally, I'd reckon we're over a third primarily British, and over half, just counting whites.

No they aren't. English-Americans are literally the same as regular "white" Americans, both have the same roots, culture, and ethnicity. They are the largest. It goes for whites:

Anglo-Saxon/English Americans >>> German Americans > power gap > everyone else.

You are confusing the Deep South with the South. Besides, majority of the greatest political and military leaders in the US stem from the South. No coincidence that Southern England > Northern England as well.
Virginia and Maryland certainly aren't close to being the fattest, poorest, uneducated states. Also if you remove Mississippi entirely from existence, the parity in economic affluence, obesity, and education become a lot closer. That state is a literal black hole.

Whatever shithead is in here trying to call us German, kill yourself, and read my post.
We are not fucking krauts. We are Americans, Yankees. And we are descended from Britain.

There's nothing anglo at all in USA

People don't understand that whites that identify simply as "American" who have been here before the 20th century are almost always uniformly English. Add those with self-identifying English/British-Americans and they are the most common European ethnic group in the country still despite the fuck ton of German, Dutch, and other Scandinavian based Americans.

>And we are descended from Britain.
actually you are mostly descended from irish slaves, you're ancestors were below niggers

People with "American" and "English" ancestry COMBINED still constitute a smaller percentage of the population than German Americans. Not even mentioning that a lot of the "Americans" are in fact lowland Scottish and Irish, not English.

>almost always uniformly English
Many are also Scottish, Scotch-Irish, or some other Britain-based group.
But I agree, we are an Anglo country.

>no they aren't
I'm sure you have solid proof for that.

>We are not fucking krauts. We are Americans, Yankees. And we are descended from Britain.

Scottish are English though. Stop pushing this false narrative that German-Americans outnumber Anglo Americans.

>Also, even then, I'd estimate that an even larger portion of the populace who are mainly British-American check an other box on the census. Why? Because they feel closer to some more recent member of the family. For example, if one has a German grandmother, and otherwise stretches back to 1680 with only British roots, that person would be likely to check German, since that's the closest contact to foreign culture he has, as British-American culture simply evolved into American culture.
For example, my mother is 1/4 Swedish, and is otherwise completely old-stock English-American, but she checks Swedish on any census.

>no argument
It wasn't until 1990 when the US Census Bureau added American to ethnicity that suddenly the majority of English identifying Americans massively dropped off compared to 1980. Stop being dumb.

americans are identityless mongrels who are mostly descendant of slaves/indentured servants

Maybe we shouldn't be fighting

Anglo's are basically half German and half Irish anyway

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servitude

>indentured servitude was very common in British North America. It was often a way for poor Europeans to immigrate to the American colonies: they signed an indenture in return for a costly passage.

This

>We are not fucking krauts. We are Americans, Yankees. And we are descended from Britain.
Did someone put you in a time capsule in the 1830s? You somehow conveniently ignore all the German and Irish migration waves, the midwest was settled pretty much exclusively with Germans plus some Scandinavians along the border with Canada.

t. identityless mongrel, descendant of slaves

>Between one-half and two-thirds of white immigrants to the American colonies between the 1630s and American Revolution had come under indentures.[2]

>Dominican
I shudder when I think of who you might descend from.

To add to this, in less than 10 years we went from having over 61+ million English descendant Americans to under 40 million between 1980 and 1990. So no fucking way in hell do German-Americans out number English ones. More are simply identifying as "American".

>between the 1630 and American Revolution
A period when barely anyone fucking lived here, good one retard.

definitely from people worth more than your irish slave ancestors

So? The midwest isn't most of our population. Unless you mean the midwest east of the Mississippi, which had more than plenty of Brits.

Main reason English beat the Dutch was because it had a much larger population

Main reason the US was more powerful then Germany in 20th century was because it had a much larger (white) population

Reminder to always filter and ignore Dominican.

I don't care about your whore mother. White Americans are mostly German.

>White Americans are mostly German.
Wrong see

Now you're not even ill-informed, as many are, you're just shitposting.
ButI'm glad to have educated you, and glad that you now understand that we are an Anglo nation.

And yet they rule the world while your country is some irrelevant shithole.

reason why americans are so trashy and vulgar is because they're descendant of the lowest form of human the british isles had to offer, so low that even african slaves were worth more to the aristocracy

america fears russia...

The only thing in common between anglos and americans is that both are the manifestation of the Whore of Babylon and should be removed from the surface of Earth for the sake of humanity

Imagine being so much of a faggot you have to get your identity from someone else who happens to share the same ethnicity as you
All of these Brits and Germans trying to take credit for American accomplishments. We are Americans, not Brits, not Germans, not Irish or any other foreign name you can call us, we are Americans, and none of you trying to claim our accomplishments for yourself will change that.

>Scottish are English though.
Yes Nigel according to the nonsense you plaster this thread with even Jamaicans are English, go peddle your cuckoldry somewhere else.

That's not an argument, that's just some retard (likely yourself) pulling assumptions and estimations out of his ass when official census data directly refute his fantasies.
>b-but they probably just feel more attached to their German heritage
>b-b-but they just started calling themselves American (like a retard ignoring than even when you add the American ancestry to English it's still less people than the Germans)
>b-but my mom
Brainlet.

So you're a Dominican or a Russian? Fuck outta here shitskin.

Anglos are scat

And Russia fears America. A civilized nation would fear putting its own people into conflict, I would assume.

>Fuck outta here shitskin.
this is you telling me to fuck off: youtube.com/watch?v=7V_oT1_YQ58

>Anglo America before German immigration
Irrelevant, provincial shithole on the periphery of civilization, rampant banditry and constant chaos, population alternating between getting BTFO by typhus and getting scalped by natives
>America after German immigration
Uncontested global hegemon, nuclear superpower, country that put a man on the moon.

>w-we wuz doitstchamerickaner n shit!

Is this a thinly veiled bait for an american hate thread?