Women Powah

Were there any successful matriarchal societies?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ppGCbh8ggUs
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Bonobos which are apes

repost this thread with an image that doesn't objectify women and i might tell you

>what is 21st century western society

Poland

When?

This.

What if rope is the new fashion trend

The most successful societies were egalitarian, so this whole patriarchy-matriarchy thing is a false dichotomy.

>typing this even ironically

Do you remember any? Here's your answer.

define successful
define matriarchal

She's smiling so she seems to like being reduced to an object.

Do ants and bees count?

Women love to be objectified. Anyone telling you otherwise is a liar or a woman.

Women love the sense of security. One way to deliver it is a claim of ownership from a guy who clearly protects his property.
There are however more civilized and ethical way to give them a sense of security.

>There are however more civilized and ethical way to give them a sense of security.
aka being a provider

>autists want to turn being a reliable partner into an insult

Low.

Never

lmao, they are like children

sauce?

You are ultra cucked lad.

I'm actually -god forbid- a feminist in the broad sense, but I think that gender egalitarianism was a product of successful societies, not a cause.

It seems to follow urbanisation, the rise of the middle class and the cultural avant garde of the society leaving an agrarian professions towards knowledge-based professions where raising children is universally a costly thing, instead of a potential source of free labour on your farm.

no

Ah, yes, what successful societies were those?

It's crackpot feminist theory called the Hajnal Line which proposes that countries that give more rights to women and let them whore around childless into their 30s are the most successful societies.

>and let them whore around childless into their 30s
I doubt thats what said theory suggests.

There's the US.

Japan has a matriarchal past, but Chinese influence and the Tokugawa era did a good job wiping it pretty clean

Yeah it does, age at first birth and the supposed low number of children are big components of that theory. It's no wonder the theory is being pushed on racialist/genetics blogs mostly by leaking vulvas like that HBD cunt and their beta husbands.

You gotta elaborate that madness my man.
As loudmouthed and offensive as chicks are these days, they are still just women.

ontopic = zionist jews, women pull the string behind every family in these tribes. your mom has to be jewish to be considered actually jewish as offspring.

You mean a country built upon the back of men that practiced slavery well into the 19th century that eventually gave voting rights to women only to have it drown in debt and foreigners in less than 100 years?

>thing that never happened

Let me reiterate, they weren't some wacko Amazon society where women did all the fighting and came home to snu snu their husband. But women could and did hold leadership positions of guilds and such.

Can you name another region thats pagan relgions head god is female? Or there very first "emperor" was an empress?

Not him but Japanese consider the Sun as a Goddess, it is enough to proof that they were Matriarchal.

>Or there very first "emperor" was an empress?
Emperor Jimmu was not a woman.

>Can you name another region thats pagan relgions head god is female?
Do you keep making up shit or what the fuck is this?

Why don't you just kill yourself you dumb shit?

Killing yourself is a feminine practice(matriarchal) and if i commited seppuku, it would be a cultural appropriation

Can't culturally appropriate women since they have no culture.

Wut?

Come on user, you'd make a fine woman

I would nut in her face and tits, then i would finger her until i was ready to fuck her in the pussy

A failed society of the capital and democracy makers, one were the people dies of with their culture and intrests, their mental health and pride.. in order to create a tamed society of slaves
The objective being status quo, the end result would be either fascism or comunism

Akschually, how you do it defines if it's feminine or masculine since men and women do it completely differently.

If you talk about doing it, you're being a bitch boy. The masculine way is to just do it.

How can we stop political correctness intercepting truth and common sense?

And giving that dirty look, one can only wonder how weet she is

Please try and be less pathetic

>she
I wouldn't be so sure.

This guy

Mosuo women.
Everything is mostly for show nowadays, but they're still cool.
(Also DUDE WEED LMAO.)

Victorian England.

Patriarchal societies will always eclipse matriarchal societies, I'll leave it to your imagination to figure out why.

Literally the greatest example in the history of humanity is Sparta. Sparta, economically, is more feminist than any modern country, they are still the most feminist nation to ever exist. Women were literally richer than the men. Women literally had more power than the men. Modern women can ramble about muh rights and muh patriarchy all they want in the 21st century, but none of them were as powerful relative to the men as Spartan women, who remain the most powerful women in history per capita

no, because the power of women is their body.. unless she shares her body with the entire society like an ant queen, then the society won't get very far.

T. Spartaboo

Obviously no such society has existed, because men are both in general physically more powerful than women, and have higher intelligence.

The irony of it all is that men would never be physically more powerful than women, and more intelligent than women, if those weren't the men women chose to mate with for hundreds of thousands of years.

im fucking not though, regardless everything I said is true.

But is correct -
>Dominican - the r€al One

ah, a &humanities tripper. Ok.

for all others, enjoy youtube.com/watch?v=ppGCbh8ggUs

why not best of both: trapiarchal. society ruled by sexy crossdressers

Just about bonobos, really.

>scripted tv show
>intended to give a bad depiction of women

Ok

>this guy

Im not seeing anything in here about women being more powerful than men in society, tho

No.

>tho
should've known

Wonen are culture.

>and have higher intelligence

Lol

for the moment history prove his claim .

Not really

There weren't any matriarchal societies at all, let alone successful ones

do you see a lot of succesful women who change their country as president or queen ?

Akssually, yes, really. And it's not a real debate in any stage of humanity ever.

>what is 21st century western society

Completely dysfunctional and a long ways down the road to serfdom

what the fuck

Victorian England

So all it takes for that designation is for the top dog to be a woman? lul

Yes. U'r mom's society with my dick

/thread

It is funny to use this example , because England was the country with the monarch with the least power in Europe , Russia would be an better example

"Lol" I don't know what you are doing on this board, underage /b/tard.

Denmark rose from irrelevant duchy-tier to the largest nation in Europe under the leadership of a woman (Margrethe).

Though the social structure outside the court was still largely patriarchal.

>Though the social structure outside the court was still largely patriarchal.

So why did you mention it, you daffy jigablet?
How about this - Irene was a decent empress, therefore muh Byzantium was muhtriarchy.

>/b/tard
>capitalising the first 'l' in 'lol'

Boy is reddit tier, m8.

There are not a single matriarcal societies except in myths. In some societies, women managed to get to powerful positions but they were still largely dominated by a male-centric system. The universality and anhistoricity of male domination is a consensus in social sciences.
See Claude Lévi-Strauss and Sherry Ortner for more on the subject.

t. cultural anthropologist
/thread

On the brink of collapse?

>Emperor Jimmu
>Using mythological figure as example