Did World War 1 mark the beginning of the end for Western Civilization?

did World War 1 mark the beginning of the end for Western Civilization?

Niether. Modernism came out of it if anything

>all those made-up countries in esst yurop
kek always triggers me
Even the names are bullshit
>yugoslavia
>czechslovakia
>latvia
Fucking slav tribes were better off under Austria and Germany

No that was the adoption of Christianity by the Roman Empire.

I'm not trying to make this thread about Rome. I think Christianity played a role but it was definitely not the main culprit. Rome's citizens were similar to Walmart Americans by the end of the empire. Rome needed to fall at that point.

yeah, because Czechoslovakia was the only part of Austria that had effective economy and supplied the rest of country.
>latvia
>slav tribe
american spotted

shut the fuck up you brainlet

t. Retarded fatburger

>tears of inferior non-superpower countries
I'd rather have nigger blood than gypsy
You are literally subhuman.

Maybe under the steady hand of the Austrian Aryan man you wouldn't have killed each other in civil wars like the unruly gippo scum you are.

Austrians aren't Aryans.

Yes.

Blame Wilson, fucking yanks divvying up a continent they knew nothing of.

>Wilson getting blamed for stuff he opposed

>be Wilson
>be obsessed with the right of self-determination for all peoples
>this kills the Austro-Hungarian Empire
>ignore armistice requests from September onwards until Germany has a revolution
>be surprised when these things precipitate another world war

>be Wilson
>support right of determination
>decide to support Kraut Vermin in Czachoslovakia
>Czechoslovak government tells him to fuck off
>gets blamed for starting ww2

Hitler was trying to make a return to or-ww1 Europe

pre-ww1*

Good.

no, he was not

I'd say the French Revolution and subsequent wars did.

French revolution created it you nigger

HAHAHA

>i'd rather have nigger blood
If you're American you already do. And Austrians and Czechs are identical genetically.

no he wasn't you idiot

...

Better be bait

And now you wanna tell me that Riga wasn't Seen as a german City for 5 centuries.

Dude every country was a made up thing in it's beginning.
Also subsumating Latvia under that term doesn't realy make seens, it was as monoethic as it get's by just having a small russian and baltic - german. So it was totally fine to become a state after wwI under consideration of the self-determination of nations progapated at this time

>"French revolution was marxist"

Launching a Marxist Revolution prior to the birth of Karl Marx

What if Austria had allied with Russia instead of Germany?

are you actually retarded?

>before and after WW1
>has italian post-WW2 borders

WWI finally erupts because of a conflict on the balkans between AH and the Russian "puppet" Serbia.
>What would have happend if Russia and AH allied?
Why should these 2 have allied they had opposing interests both not in the colonial game anymore and competing over influence in the Balkans. The only theater of that time were AH still Played a major role

It makes a lot more sense than the Habsburgs allying with the fucking Ottomans. What were they thinking?

After the balkan wars ottos had no controll of any thing on the balkan left and with russia and AH backing the New state no chance of regaining anything so why not Team up with one against the other(and russia was the more recent enemy). Also since the Ottos and Germany were allies it was they had to Deal with the brother they didn't like

Why not ally with Russia and BTFO Germany together?

define western civilization

Cause noone(atleast that I know of) wanted another brotherwar nether in AH or Germany cause there was to much shit going on the balkans and over seas(marroco, Sudan,SA,Great game...) were on had the same or no interests

>t. Cleetus

Also what would AH conquer from Germany. The german saw themself as such and finally had a unified state so why back the only somewhat german other german state on found against in his youth.
Silesia? It' 20th not 19th century.
Vordrrösterreich? Nobody was even still around at 1900 who could remeber Habsburgian rule.
The South german states? These guys were Happyend in Germany and their Kings(Wb,Ba) and the Großherzog of Baden couldn't gain anything from having a new Austrian ruler since the already had the top ranks under being an Emperor.
If they would conquered all that ether way a big antihabsburg Sentiment since would have risen in notime and you would have had nationalistic revolutionaries besides socialists causing trouble.
The colonies? I don't think that A-H had any colonial interests and dreams besides the Balkan left at that time.
All of it, forcing the Großdeutschelösung 50 years to late to a sollen Problem? The other great Powers wouldn't allow that because of muh Balance of power

It mark transition from western civilization to global civilization, just as classical civilization transition to Christendom, same entity, different values and spirit

Yes, exactly as planned.

Never said it was Marxist, strawman much?

what do you mean with "end", op? its perfectly relative

You mean the French Revolution.

French revolution created the western civilization you mongoloid nigger

No, it ended it. Egalitarianism is anti-western.

Retard

Yes. Before WW1, Europeans were slowly colonizing Africa from south up. Give it another 50 years of peace and most of Africa would have been genocided of blacks and replaced with European settlers

European and Anglo dominance really. Pretty much an end to the old world.

I dont think so

The real question is Germany allying Russia.

Now THAT is an alliance for the ages

>most of Africa would have been genocided of blacks

Meanwhile you cumskins bitch that you're being bred out, and we didn't even need to shoot anything besides loads into white bitches