Result: Decisive French Victory

>result: Decisive French Victory

>result: Statu quo ante bellum

>result: Decisive Rashidon Victory

>Result: Fall of the Second French Empire

>tactical defeat, strategic victory

name 1 (one) time this happened

Battle of Hastings

>Heroic Victory = Phyrric Victory

>result: Phyrric victory

Fontenoy

Haha Wake up frenchy, don't pretend to be dead

(((Literally)))

>result: Cadmean victory

>Ethiopian Victory

>result: remain

W W I (World War One). Among other things.

WW2

>battles involving England where England got BTFO
>search for wikipedia articles
>Result: Inconclusive
>Result: English tactical defeat but strategic victory
>Result: England ass raped and forced to withdraw but they blew up some warehouse somewhere so it's a draw
>click sources
>Nigel Bobcock Shufflebottom, Eunice Turtlespoon and Ross Fartsworth

>Decisive Emu victory

Britbongs really swarmed all over the article for the War of Jenkins Ear. By any reasonable standard that was a crushing defeat for Britain. They took three times their enemy's losses and ceded territory while being the aggressors, with their 30,000-man offensive in the Caribbean resulting in them being crushed in battle and their fleet being sunk. But the page says "draw" because Spain's 1,500-man raid into Georgia ended up withdrawing.

>Sources: Woodfine, Newman, Brown, Hakim

>Result: Swiss cantons signed the Treaty of Fribourg establishing the "Perpetual Peace"

kek

Battle of austerlitz

>Result: Allied Victory, Strategic targets destroyed, Extensive German casualties

>Result: Strategic X victory, tactical Y victory

>Result: Decisive Byzantine victory

>Result: Destruction of the German Empire

>Result: Decisive Ottoman victory, Fall of the Byzantine Empire

>Decisive Constantinian victory

Saintonge War

...

>result: Decisive X Victory, X Forces Forced to Retreat

...

>CASUALTIES AND LOSSES
>99999 X killed (Y claims)
>12 X killed (X claims)

>Result: American friendly-fire airstrike

You have to take the most credible one

For exemple, only a fool would believe Vietnamese figures rather than French ones at Dien Bien Phu, or Chinese figures rather than UN ones in the Korean War

>x victory
>3000 x killed
>7 y captured

>Casualties
>1 kettle with presumably all of the soup in it

>Battle of Hoth
>Imperial Tactical Victory
>Not Rebel Pyrrhic Victory

It hurts for me as well man.

>Result: Decisive Tang Victory
>20, 000-30, 000 civilians were eaten

Battle of the Pyramids

>result: Decisive Italian Victory
>gains: One Bucket

>Decisive Axis Victory

>Soviet Victory
>Killed/Wounded: 300.000+

>Killed, captured or missing: 616,304

Kek

>only a fool would believe Vietnamese figures rather than French ones at Dien Bien Phu, or Chinese figures rather than UN ones in the Korean War
The general rule of thumb is to divide kill claims by three, and that each side is more or less telling the truth about their own strength and losses at least in hindsight. For example, the US claims the UN forces killed 400,000+ Chinese in the Korean War. China, with the actual records available, cites the much more precise number of 183,108 total dead, with about 120,000 killed in combat. Another: during Allied Force NATO claimed to have killed or wounded 15,000 Serbian soldiers (5,000 dead, 10,000 wounded). Serbia gave the figure of 6,231 casualties (1,058 dead and 5,173 wounded). NATO subsequently revised their claim down to 6,200 (1,200 killed and 5,000 wounded; presumably they think some DOW?).

Sometimes an enemy side is surprisingly accurate in their estimates though. Like, the USA's claims of their enemy's KIA in WW2 and Vietnam ended up being really damn close to what said enemies later admitted. For example the current Vietnamese government has gone on record saying 849,018 of their soldiers and allied insurgents died in that war, from 1960 to 1975. Very close to the USA's 950,765 estimate for NVA and VC killed (which the DOD said should be deflated by 30%, so ~666,000) from 1964 to 1975 (there was only light action in the first few years; ARVN deaths in the years 1960-1964 totaled (23,000 and we're likely on par with the Communists).

>Result: Dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire

is the soviet union X ?

English nationalism is the cringiest shit

>decisive parthian victory
>decisive german victory
>decisive sassanid victory
>decisive carthaginian victory
>decisive gothic victory
>decisive hunnic victory
>decisive frankish victory
>decisive caliphate victory
>decisive mongol victory
>decisive ottoman victory

>chinese can figh-

>Nationalist victory

>Russian victory
>6 gorillion Russian casualties 1 enemy wounded

>British victory
>1 Injured, 20 billion enemies killed

>Anglo victory

Battle of Denain

Bouvines
Castillon
Rocroi
Fontenoy
Austerlitz
1918 counter offensive

Should i keep going ?

>Irish Propaganda Victory

>Execution of the king and abolition of the monarchy

>2 with rifles

>massive rebel base destroyed in imperial search and destroy
>thousands of rebel cong fighters arrested or killed
>Organa supplied snowspeeder squadron shot down

>Imperials lose 2 AT-ATs
>not Decisive Imperial Victory
u wot m8

>result: English victory

kek

With the knowledge that the rebels were based there anything but their absolute destruction counts as a loss.

...

Every time.

You realize they won right?

What does that even mean?

I said name 1 you illiterate simpleton

they lost the battle but their action/s helped win the war

They got territory and imposed a peace treaty yes, but still, the fact that a country with a population of 140.000.000+ couldn't conquer one of barely 4.000.000 is pretty shameful imo

>result: All You Need is Kill

ebin lad

upvoted

>result: Establishment of the 4th Reich

wtf i love 1453 now

Battle of Allia

things that never happened: the post

>Casualties and Losses: 20,000-30,000 civilians were eaten

Delet this

>Outcome: Dissolution of the Soviet Union into independent republics

Tbh the etheopians had vastly superior numbers similar armament, decent generalship, and much higher moral (autism colonialism vs defending a civilization thats been around for thousands of years)

>decisive tang victory

Something like battle of Minsk, Soviets lost it, but Germs suffered extremely high losses compared to other salients in early Barbarossa, it also caused huge delay in march on Moscow.

Quite unexpected

*Battle of Smolensk

>Result: Inconclusive

upvote