For the past 2 days I have made 115 euro playing roulette...

For the past 2 days I have made 115 euro playing roulette. Is it possible that I could actually make a living as a professional gambler? I put 20 cent on 20 numbers so I have a greater than 50% chance of hitting. I then take the winnings from that and put 50 cent on 15 numbers. If that hits then I start the process again. If I do the same today I will have doubled my disability allowance.

Other urls found in this thread:

metro.co.uk/2010/01/15/ashley-revell-the-man-who-put-it-all-on-roulette-red-34233/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Yeah for sure it sounds like you found a fool proof strategy congrats!!

Quit while you're ahead bud. You're this close to losing it all.
You'll NEVER beat the system especially with roulette. If you want to gamble play blackjack or something.

It takes too much brains to make big money in blackjack and too much money to make big money in poker.

yeah yeah go big

sounds like you really mathed the shit out of it

bet it all


let us know when you're rich in lambos

you wont lose if you keep doubling your stske user

holy shit
why didn't i think of this?

thanks user.

see you at the dealership!

Albert Einstein himself said Roulette is unbeatable. Trust me, there is no scalable long-term betting strategy that can prevail in the long run.

>disability allowance
Is it mental?

No, I'm in a coma.

Einstein also said black holes didn't exist.

Roulette is easily beatable with a smartphone camera

i remember my gramps showing me an article similar to this one, maybe its the same story but different media anyways

metro.co.uk/2010/01/15/ashley-revell-the-man-who-put-it-all-on-roulette-red-34233/

Yeah, but one was highly theoretical astrophysics. The other is basic statistics.

Pretty sure he wasn't wrong about roulette, bro.

Dude just quit now, when I first started gambling I kept winning on roulette and thought I could beat the system. I was up 2k at one point but kept going back and eventually lost it all and about 3k of my own money, point is you can't beat the house edge so stay away

>implying he was wrong about black holes as well

If I hit 1k I'm putting it into crypto and starting again.

>game of chance
>can I do it for a living?

What if you bet on red and it goes on black? FUCKING RETARD

No.

You will lose everything if you keep this up long enough, I promise.

Just because you have a 50%+ chance of hitting doesn't mean this is profitable. When you hit you're winning .20*36 - 19*.20 = $3.40 but when you lose you're losing 20*.20 = $4.00.

Imagine if I proposed we flip a coin. If it's heads I'll pay you $1 but if it's tails you pay me $1.50. Even though you have a 50% chance of "winning" this would obviously be a terrible bet. This is essentially what you're doing. No betting """strategy""" will ever erase the inherent edge in casino games.

The one exception is counting in blackjack but this opportunity probably doesn't exist in internet casinos and it's hardly worth the effort in land-based casinos.

If you want to become a "professional gambler" poker is the only real option. This is because you're playing against other players and not the house.

But because of the double zeros you don't even have a 50% chance. Roulette is a losing game and the house always has the edge. Not a huge edge but it doesn't have to be.

You guys are idiots. He literally has MORE than a 50% chance of WINNING. How do you lose money when you win more than you lose?

It is beatable, but with an infinite ammount of money in the first place.

Did you read the OP? If you play 20 numbers you undeniably have a greater chance of winning than losing.

Over the long run you'll win more often than you'll lose but 1 loss will wipe out the profits from multiple wins so you'll still end up down.


Terrible bait.

If it's that easy then show me a single roulette multi-millionaire.

Even with the double zeros there are only 38 numbers. 20 numbers gives you a more than 50% chance of hitting.

lmaoing @ ur life

t. statistics professor

Did you read the other posts? It doesn't matter if your odds of winning are higher, your losses cost more, and that overpowers your wins.

Let's roll a dice, I'll give you $1 for everything not 6, but you have to pay me $100 every time it's a 6. You're going to win way more, but who's going to get more money in the long run? That's an exaggerated version of what you're doing, but with the same concept.

It sounds like you've rediscovered the Martingale betting system.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)

>the absolute state of /biz threads nowadays

itt brainlets who think numbers are everything and there is no such thing as good luck in the world

Its not that hard to understand that when the game's risk is bigger than the rewards. You dont need to be einstein to see that, you just need to be a brainlet to fall for it.

Hint: the scam is in the green 00

Yes yes, we all know about the house advantage, but I've already explained through reasoning why it won't work, and ppl here don't wanna listen to reason. So I figured they don't wanna take some user's word for it, they can at least trust Einstein's.

>and too much money to make big money in poker.

If you've got the time you can just grind your way up the stakes. I started with 10$ playing micros and moved up until I had a 15k$ bankroll, but I was still a kid in highschool so I had the time to play a lot.

>tfw you hit red/black and even/odd in one spin

casinos live roulettes have been beaten several times due to 0.01% bend in the board etc.

rngs too have been beaten that wiil require you to know the first cell in the random generator

i made 45$ yesterday playing roulette by just playing black and then 1/3rds. shit was so easy

I'll give 0.1 btc to the first person who links me crypto groups on discord and telegram.

There's good luck and then there's basic fucking probability. Turns out the former only counts for short term gains.

Every single roll your chances will always be the same, you aren't guaranteed a win or loss after a certain amount of rolls but as that n gets larger the outcome will always be against you. There is a 51% chance of losing in roulette.

If you start off with 100 and put down a dollar each time, statistcally you'll end up with 99 dollars after 100 rolls. You play martingale and double up each loss, you'll still end up losing money and can even get royally fucked if you hit a losing streak.

I won 55 ETH this week playing martingale on etheroll.com.

it's easy money, you've just got to switch up the system

How are people on a business board so fucking retarded

THERE IS NO WAY TO BEAT ANY DICE GAME WTF

Yes but you can get out when you made profit.

If you play craps the right way, you can get the house odds to less than 0.1%. It's the best table game to play.

That said, thats over 1000s of rolls. Every time you play is a micro-session, and sometimes you'll be up, sometimes you'll get burned fast.

real talk eurotrash, is this bait?

You're a fucking retard, or baiting, or both.

ok i'll quit now. I'm $13500 up there you go I beat the system. retard

warosu.org/biz/, search for "discord" and "t.me"

you can easily run rng test runs it is possible to be up on roulette after 30 000 spins. that would be more than a man could spin at live roulette. a long run is a long run whether it's casino, sports betting or stocks. luck plays a role, if you have enough people flipping coins there are lottery winners

no, i made a living from like 2005-2007 grinding low stakes NL hold'em at the local casino, mostly $1/2NL upto $5/10 on occasion. I wasn't well off but I paid all my bills/mortgage and slowly increased bankroll/savings.

As soon as I started playing other games at the casino (due to burnout/boredom of poker mostly) I lost a shitload. Worst night lost $5k playing blackjack, another night $4k on roulette.

You can't make money over the longterm by gambling, other than playing poker.

you can absolutely win long term playing blackjack but it's not as easy as just walking in and playing

this guy knows what he's talking about

unless you're counting, no you can't

if you were a live poker player that could too be attributed for luck, the play is so slow. i believe many live players are in false illusion of their skills, unless you play against some drunken people

the lower win rates the larger sample you will require to know if you are a winning player, often times online professionals say 100k hand sample would be enough when the win rates are very shallow at higher stakes. at lower stakes a highly skilled professional can lock 5-10k hands per a day with a huge win rate, thus even bad luck cannot attribute for long losing streaks

not really nowadays, most big casinos use autoshufflers loaded with like 6-8 decks or whatever and they only penetrate about 10% of the cards before a full reshuffle, at least thats been my observation in every casino I've ever been to, it makes counting near impossible since the counts reset every 5-10 minutes and by the time enough hands have been dealt to reestablish a count they just reshuffle again.

yap, casinos are well aware of card counting thus constantly shuffling decks. phil ivey and his mistress pulled a nice trick with edge shorting at a live casino, that is not easy either and only gives a slight edge

the casino secure expert told after phil's trick the he would not let phil ivey even play slots at his casino =D the guy would probably win from those too. wonder if ivey used to edge short when he played more live poker earlier years

i played a fair bit online as well and had positive winrate/earnings, but I liked playing live more.

Yea of course you have a point, there's obviously an element of luck to poker as well, and the play is much slower. I wouldn't say taking money off drunk people is indicative of luck though, it was part of my strategy, my biggest earning nights were always Friday/Saturday and I would intentionally seat change next to drunks or blue-collar redneck types. Fair game as far as I was concerned.

Stopped keeping track of hand counts during live play but basically I would play every day, sometimes 7 days a week, for about 12-18 hours each day, with maybe 1 or 2 days a month off. Did that for about 2 years straight, hence the burnout. Haven't played much poker at all since ~2010.

I might be wrong here, but the numbers don't seem to add up
(33/34)^20=~0.55
0.20*20=$4
0.20*34=$6.80
this would suggest that after a few rounds you'd be winning a lot less money than what you'd need to break even

It's not about card counting (although it's a given you have to be able to do this) but finding the right promotions and bonus

Ah okay, yea I've heard about those people using the promos/bonuses to make profit, not something I really ever looked into though. Fair enough

Fuck off. The answer is there aren't any cuz roulette is a losing game. Period.