Holy shit this board is garbage. Nothing but straight up ethnonationalism in every thread

Holy shit this board is garbage. Nothing but straight up ethnonationalism in every thread.

You can find some decent threads if you look for them, even if they have memes in the topic

Everyone on Veeky Forums is a Nazi

Fuck this place

>Implying "ethnonationalism" isn't redundant and there's such thing as non-ethnic nationalism
>Implying nations aren't defined by an ethnic group
>Implying "ethnonationalism" isn't the norm in the world right now

>>Implying "ethnonationalism" isn't redundant and there's such thing as non-ethnic nationalism
The United States

You are extremely stupid. Language and culture has always taken precedence in proto and early nationalist thought.

There's definitely /pol/ and /b/ raids going on.

What a massive retard you are. Google "civic nationalism" a concept that has existed for over two centuries and is the foundation of most developed countries.

Ignore the retards desu.
You gotta sift through it, but that's okay because history in a Veeky Forums context is pretty nice when it's not contaminated by retards.

Language and culture is ethnicity

It's because of Catalonian independence, it has brought all the separatist nationalist racists out of the woodwork

It's funny because Veeky Forums was originally an anarchist/left-leaning website and all the racism was ironic until alt-right retards flooded the site and took /pol/ seriously.

Civic nationalism is a meme that gives no actual justification for why independent nations should exist, it's not an actual coherent ideology

The majority of developed world nations were founded on ethnic nationalism not civic nationalism. There's only a few exceptions like the USA and Canada

The board quality abruptly fell off a cliff a month or so ago for some reason. I mean it has always had its ups and downs but recently it crashed hard for whatever reason.

Nah man, Veeky Forums was never left leaning. Apolitical at best. People really have to ignore this hardcore redditor revisionist history.

>Civic nationalism is a meme that gives no actual justification for why independent nations should exist
Sure it does. Culture (including language) and/or institutions instead of ethnic proximity as the unifying factor.
>The majority of developed world nations were founded on ethnic nationalism not civic nationalism.
Not really. It's probably more like half and half. France and Spain weren't founded on ethnic nationalism. England is debatable. And even where ethnic nationalism was the main unifying factor, a lot of the time it was unscientific, based on fantasy and imagination rather than actual genetic proximity.

Tell me which developed nations only grant citizenship to specific ethnicities.

>Culture (including language)
That's ethnic nationalism
>and/or institutions
Does not justify nations existing, if a certain set of institutions are good they should be good everywhere, their effectiveness would not stop at an arbitrary border line
>based on fantasy and imagination rather than actual genetic proximity
Ethnicities are defined by common identity and culture not genetic markers

In fact, nationalism in the Austro-Hungarian empire was defined mostly in a political-factional sense. A group of Hungarian nobles, Polish upper-class separatists, Slovenian language speakers etc. Not couched in ethnic terms whatsoever.

>Ethnicities are defined by common identity and culture not genetic markers

Obviously ethnicity is a complicated and hard to define concept but the idea it doesn't usually include some sort of shared ancestry is rubbish.

who sold you people this bullshit concept any way, its like the first time i heard it was from some fag in a bar last year and since then iv noticed it repeated over and over again mostly by edgy kids

it dosent work that way, cant tell what youre even trying to accomplish with that notion since its obviously meant to be highly instrumental, a sort of countermeasure against fuck knows what and somehow you guys think youre so fucking smart having developed it as somekind of right wing variant of identity politics

a nation is not a ethnicity which is not the same as a genetic group which is not the same as language or culture, all these things are interrelated but are not the same, conflating them negates either one ore the other

a nation is a political construct, a ethnos is what one is born into, as in a language and a culture and a set of identities, but thats not a nationality, a nationality is a official designation written into your documents, in the sense of culture it is beyond ethinc culture, a official language is not the same thing as dialect, state ideology is not how people actualy think, national foreign and domestic policies are not necesarily a reflection of what people would do or choose, and even as a identity its super-ethnic, precisely because its a superstructure, your ethnicity is what you are, not your passport, ethno-nationalism as a concept isnt mearly redundant and tautological, it degenerates both elements, since one or both get negated when equated, either ethnicity is negated and leveled out into a nation monolith, which is simply a lie, or the nation is fragmented as every ethnicity is aserted over the whole, which then looks something like bosna

this happens when americunts try to deal with notions they cannot understand, then other fags pick it up simply because any american discourse becomes domminant all over the internets even tho it has nothing to do and is incompattible with the situations and circumstances elsewhere