Roman race baiting

this thread is for you-know-who.
some of em were white and some of em were brown, who the fuck cares you goddamn cretin

Other urls found in this thread:

theapricity.com/earlson/history/emperors.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

You made this thread for me?
Am i that famous?

Also no, latin people were similar to ancient greeks

Italians used to be white

>Am i that famous?
no, infamous. I'll say it again, you're a cretin

They still are...
Just not pure Aryan Nordic (tm)

The white race is a fusion of mainly three different groups:
1. European Hunter-Gathers
2. Neolithic farmers
3. Indo-European

Anthropology would have classified

Sorry my phone fucked me.

Anthropology for the 19th and 20th century would have classified these sub-races as Aryan, Alpine, and Mediterranean.

Southern European (AKA Italians/Romans) are predominantly descended from Neolithic farmers (Mediterranean), but all again they are a mixture of the all three sub-races.

...

Fuck off retard

>you're a cretin
Well im taking creatine

B A N
H I M

Can you explain why?

What rules am i breaking?

The unspoken rule of not being an irritating nigger faggot

So Veeky Forums is not just full of shitposters and wewuzing, good post user

Butthurt

>some of em were white and some of em were brown, who the fuck cares you goddamn cretin

Second.

>my phone fucked me.
Really? All mine will do is vibrate in my pocket a little bit.

Ethnicity doesnt work like that

Latins were homogeneous and had similar features

Germanics just want to claim their history

The important thing is we all agree Stavros Diallopolous is right when he says the Byzantines were totally Roman

Original Italics were Nordic Indo-Europeans, and Roman elites were predominantly Nordic.

Doesn't work like what? You seem to be putting concepts in my post that were not there.

"The Romans" were around for a long fucking time, and were not any one thing throughout there history. Roman citizenship was extended to people brought into the Empire, which would have included multiple ethnicities and certainly multiple skin tones, given the geographical range of Roman conquest.

Latins are one group who were part of the larger concept of "Romans," and an ever-smaller portion of that group over time.

If your argument is that the initial small village on the Tiber that grew into Rome would have likely had ethnically similar citizens, you are likely correct. But so what?

Was that the guy who made Stavros mod?

>there history

FUCK! Gotta proofread more before posting...

"Their," obviously.

Romans were a latin people just like athenianw were greeks

You get it now?
So latin people were dark haire dark eyee people and romans were like that

>dark haired
Hair was only invented in 1954

>So latin people were dark haire dark eyee people and romans were like that
Both wrong.

Original Latin Italic people were NORDIC. Just like the Roman elites:

theapricity.com/earlson/history/emperors.htm

Nobody likes you, you're an insufferable cunt

why do you faggots keep making these threads?

So people have to like me?

Do you know where you are?

With out a doubt a good portion of Romans leader were brown, Rome in many cases was more socially accepting then most people today. Besides the child fucking that was going, it must have been bretty gomfy.

>theapricity.com/earlson/history/emperors.htm

I bet nobody even read this link. Its pretty undeniable the patricians, and the original romans were some sort of fair-featured folk. They certainly weren't arab or southern italian looking mafiosos like modern italians like to larp

WE

keep memeing away reality

WUZ DOMINIGGER

>tfw thought this said reddit space baiting