Why didn't China completely wipe out Manchu influence after 1912?

Why didn't China completely wipe out Manchu influence after 1912?

Perhaps they liked it?

My guess is that the Warlord Period chaos prevented any large scale projects. Also, my guess is the Japanese or Russians would have intervened and taken Manchuria if that happened.

don't think that was very high on the priority list.

They still trying
Look up hanfu larpers

Because the Manchus are widely regarded as a legitimate dynasty. It's basically 50/50 if China was under random steppe warlords though history, if your going to try and purge all that then you'd best genocide the northern half of the country.

Because when an ethnicity 1/100th your number manages to cuck you so hard they legally force you to have a single type of haircut for 200 years, you simply cannot see reason from all that cum in your eyes.

because they would break away and join Japan or Russia, not something they would be inclined to do, just a better alternative to being genocided

They tried.

Because they didn’t even need to try. The Manchu language is nearly extinct, most Manchus today speak Mandarin Chinese as a first language, and in a matter of time they will all have assimilated to the Han.

They did.

>50/50 rule under steppe warlords
I hate this meme

Tolerand rebublican ideels :DD

>Yuan
>Qing
>Five dyansties into the Jin
>Southern and Northern dynasties
>pre-Han migrations

This isn't even counting the endless auxiliaries, tributaries, paid-off generals, population migrations, depopulation and replacements, or moments outside powers compelled tribute from the Chinese or just militarily kicked their ass and moved into a small section.

China might as well be one with the steppe, the strength of China has always been not falling for the ethno-state meme and assimilating barbarians where necessary.

None of this post was accurate

Gee what an informative post user, good to see discourse on a history board.

>2 dynasties that unified China for a total of 400 years
>minor fuedal states for a couple hundred
It's not even close to 50/50.
Closer to 20/80 or 30/70

Feudal states comprising the heartland of China, the Yellow River Valley. They ruled half of China during their respective periods of division.

Which means they aren't even close to 50/50.
It's like saying the Iberian peninsula is 50/50 Muslim caliphate due to the Muslim conquests even though it's obvious that the Roman influence is more central to Spanish identity than the Arab influence

Because the hatred of the Qing wasnt because they were foreign -the Manchus barely spoke their language by that point-but because they were a declining dynasty who was losing the Mandate of Heaven (to the traditional Chinese), while to others they were a backward power incapable of modernising or defending the Chinese state (to the modern nationalists).

Though there was some massacres of Manchus during the revolution. However mandarins got killed too.

Alright, having just totaled it up, it's about 700 years since the Qin dynasty founding in 221 BC, so roughly 1/3 of the 2200 years since. I'm not questioning that these peoples where assimilated in China rather than the other way around. But their impact on China also can't be understated, or erased a la OP.

>>Qing
>Five dyansties into the Jin
Jurchens and Manchus are agriculturalists.

>pre-Han migrations
Rong-Di are Sino-Tibetan speaking agro pastoralists separate from the horse riding Hu.

They did, they also completely wiped out their own culture around the 60's.

Even today, Southern Chinese are clearly different. They are actually Bai Yue peoples and only gain historical legitimacy from their connection to central and northern China, aka ~Real China~

t. Vietnamese

Southern Chinese follow a genetic cline where Jianghuai speakers have the most Northern Chinese ancestry while Pinghua and Hainanese speakers are almost indistinguishable from native populations.