Pretty decent video about Hitler's rise to power by small time Youtuber Vernaculis

Hitler does fit the description of a
>a cruel and oppressive ruler
because the German people loved him.

Well he ruled some other countries after 1938, and those people did not love him.

...

There's a difference between an occupation and a governance

with that logic churchill was also a tyrant with invading iceland and faroe islands

And what about the German people who didn't love him? You know, the ones who had their rights curtailed over time until they were eventually murdered by the state. Pretty sure he was a tyrant to them.

Where does the Native American come from?

Where is this photo analyzer?

Try again, Rosenberg. Communists aren't people

tyrant =/= cruel

Look at where the concept of tyrant originated (Greeks). Many tyrants ushered in the golden age of their cities.

Cause he gave off the illusion that he was getting shit turned around when in reality they were just short term band aids to structural issues, and probably would have collapsed like any other dictators if he hadn't started his idiotic ruinous war. See Zaire. Gets turned around a little bit, but then becomes a corrupt crony state.

He probably would have rewarded his cronies more and more, and it would have become more corrupt and rotten. Hell, even during the 30s there was rampant corruption and people would say "If only the Fuhrer knew." Eventually, Germany would probably eventually turn into an African like backwater.

what is cruel ?

And then were killed off because they were hated. Tyrant really just means strong ruler. However, there is a reason it came to mean what it did.

You do know he purged right wing parties too right?

>enabling act of 1933 approved by Reichstag AND president
>tyrant
Hurr durr germans dindu nuffin

Normally the first Tyrant wasn't killed, it was generally their heir or grandchild.

Still doesn't change the fact that he was a tyrant.

Maybe, but there is a reason the word tyrant has taken on the meaning it does today.

>because the German people loved him.
Being liked does not mean you aren't cruel or oppressive.

He was both cruel and oppressive, what do you mean? He fits perfectly in your definition.

did Churchill make death camps and slave labourers of the Icelanders?

epic!

...

Is it bad if you are cruel and oppressive against those few who are cruel and oppressive against your own people?

So he should have been cruel and oppressive to the French?

You mean like all the Slavs who were minding their own business? They deserved to be wiped out because some autist needed to make space for Lebensraum?

Was pretty shitty to the Bengalis.

XD! Way to show (((them)))

Oh, so the US is a tyranny because of Ruby Ridge and Waco then, right?
Gas yourself you stupid kike