I don't like Hitler... But you have to admit he was a good speaker

>I don't like Hitler... But you have to admit he was a good speaker

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=q-PlqqK9B9Y
youtube.com/watch?v=8vMypCinkRk
youtube.com/watch?v=PxotLDtwT50
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I like Stalin though.

A charismatic populist being a charismatic populist?
Oh the horror!

>I dont like numbers.... But you have to admit that these are good doubles

>I dare state that repeating numbers are superior to single digits

He was, though Goebbels was better.
>WOLLT IHR DEN TOTALEN KRIEG?

His speeches sure as hell don't move me. The shouting, hand-waving, appeal to emotion method doesn't convince me. I'd rather hear a stoic, monotone speech.

Mosley's speeches > Hitler's
>tfw England lives and marches on

That's really cool bro, good for you.

Those emotive parts were climaxes of his speeches. There were long build-ups before that.

This but unironically
youtube.com/watch?v=q-PlqqK9B9Y

I'm never ironic about /ourguy/

Mosley is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural

youtube.com/watch?v=8vMypCinkRk
is there anything he wasn't right about?

>I like Hitler, but you have to admit he takes the jew thing a little too hard

>I'd rather hear a stoic, monotone speech
NPRfag detected

Not teaming up with my waifu

God, he was brilliant.

Sorry, she's mine.

Them's fightin' words

Appealing to populism isn't that hard.

youtube.com/watch?v=PxotLDtwT50

Implying that the conflict created from multiculturalism was inherently bad.
Conflict is necessary for progress, it is literally the driving factor behind change in the natural world (competition between all living things to be the most fit to survive).
And change in itself is also an ultimately good force, as defined by nature. Change is necessary to adapt and survive to the ever-changing environments of Earth.
Man did not learn to farm by bull-headedly doing the same things as their forefathers did, but instead by daring to try out something different for a change because hey, why not, it might work.
Even if progress ends unfavorably, it is still necessary and good. It lets us learn from the mistakes we made, and gives us the experience and wisdom needed to press forward more efficiently than before. To reject change, in any form, is to reject progress, and by denying progress we embrace stagnation, and through stagnation death.

Growing up in Germany everyone thought his speeches were strange. Imagine someone with a funny accent yelling trying to sell you a country

It’s always that pasty, acne-ridden, edgelord who loves reading Mien Kampf too. Just shut the fuck up kid.

And I know I just described most of /pol/

There is literally nothing wrong with NPR

>Conflict is necessary for progress

Lmao, this cuck fell for the progress meme

>conflict sometimes ends well, so that means we should encourage universal conflict for no purpose

It's not hard to be good at public speaking in a country full of autists like Germany

>progress
>good

You know what else ends well?