Maybe if i write like such a complete out-of-touch lunatic people will mistake it for a genuine contribution to...

>maybe if i write like such a complete out-of-touch lunatic people will mistake it for a genuine contribution to philosophy

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Being_Right
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Even beyond death Schopenhauer still shitposts.

Post Kant German philosophy was a mistake

How can one man be so bad, and yet so right?

His Will was so powerful that, even after it has been sublimated into the general Will, he can't stop himself.

I wonder who could be behind these posts
Perfidious Schopenhauer, I am coming for you

>I'll put more effort trying not to understand than understanding.
>If I don't get it, it must be wrong.
>I don't know a quarter of the bibliography quoted, but I still think I can get a grasp of it.

The first two are fair criticisms, the third, not so. One shouldn't write philosophy in coded reference, the point is to bring clarity. If you refer me to another work when I seek explanation from you, it only tells me you have failed the test of the ladder.

Regards

>If you refer me to another work when I seek explanation from you, it only tells me you have failed the test of the ladder.
No, I'll only tell you that you didn't pass philosophy 101.

What a smug faggot. I was just bantering. Try to find wherever your skull has lodged itself in your large intestine, if you can

>Didn't pass rhetoric either.

Would the world have been a better place if German Idealism had been strangled in the crib?

If you're doing a caricature of someone who proves Schopenhauer's point, it's a pretty good one.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_Being_Right

So you're going for a hard 8, I take it?

Among others.

>being this autistic
>thinks philosophy 101 is even worth mentioning

man high school must be hard

read -->

>not even understanding his own argument

that's some advanced autism you've got going there

we're gonna get in a loop here.
Anyway --->

>>not even understanding his own argument
>that's some advanced autism you've got going there

>not even understanding his own argument
>I'll put more effort trying not to understand than understanding.
>If I don't get it, it must be wrong.

>unironically thinking there's such a thing as right and wrong

you win, that's too retarded.