Do manlets genuinely have an advantage while lifting??

Gymcel lanklet**
Fucking autocorrect

yeah, its not huge though. I'm 5'9 and put a lot more muscle on faster than my friends who are taller, but even for my height I have lanky limbs so I'm fugged either way

How would height have to do with a pull up.

A short man with proportionally long arms would have a bigger problem, because he has more rom.

But unless you are tall, AND your arms are unusually long, it shouldn't make a difference at all.

Even then, you should be able to do at least 10 pull ups if you even lift.

stop thats no excuse im 190 cm and went from no pullups to 10 in a month u must be fat

Of course.

fuck do i know nigga
it just doesnt work. im 106kg and im still doing 70kg bench press
atleast i look a little good when flexing

Have you considered
1. Your lanklet friends diet and workout programming are inferior
2. The same amount of muscle looks like more on a smaller frame?
3. Your friends don't even

I'm 6'3" and I can do 15 full range/no kipping pullups

How much you weigh?

6ft-6ft1 is the sweet spot for height, fuck off with your memes

unless you're willing to juice

aesthetic 184cm > lanky 195cm any day of the week

>fat as fuck
>benches babby weight
So.. You don't even lift?

I bench 100kg at 79kg bodyweight.

>But that only matters in relation to the rest of your body.
>How would it make a difference if the proportions are the same.
are you legitimately retarded?

>moving a 100kg barbell 20cm
>moving a 100kg barbell 40cm
you honestly think those are equally difficult?

>tfw 5"8 but have the armspan of a fucking 6" eagle so I have the disadvantages of a lanlet but the appearance of a manlet.

I know I was supposed to be 6", what the fuck went wrong?

Post pic of yourself flexing.

I am trying to expand my "delusional fatties who lift" folder

Yeah actually, I have a really strict diet and they eat like shit, lift like shit, but I guess you phrased it right, the same amount of muscle looks like more on my frame

>moving a bar from your sternum to locked out arm extension
>moving a bar from your sternum to locked out arm extension
Yes, it is the same.

Range of motion isn't objective, it is relative.

so you're genuinely retarded then

nice

lanky people have shitty leverages and it's harder for them to put on the same muscle mass relative to their bodies

it's weird because it doesnt even look that bad

yes, both in aesthetics (when there's no one nearby to dwarf them) and in actual weight lifted

in terms of leverages and ROM a 5'5 manlet will have to exert significantly less work than a 6'5 manmore

the manlet's body also has a smaller surface area so the same amount of muscle will look like a lot more muscle on his frame than on the taller guy

Well no they come from women.

i see the problem you were born without lats

Rom is relative but that doesn't ignore what that fucking means in the first place. Let's take the extreme for example

Shaq is going to have to move the bar and weight a hell of a lot farther than mini me. If Shaq is only doing half reps, then his rom isn't as great as Mini Me's though he is still moving the bar way farther than MM.

Lots of manlets have lanky arms.
Lots of lanklets have stubby arms.
>doesn't even look that bad
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

but mechanical principles are very objective, you fucking muppet

>what are leverages

it's easier for taller people to DL because we have longer arms.

I can only bench 150, but i DL 350. Still weak, but relative to my other lifts it's a lot
6'6"

Those womanly love handles though. Slap some tits on there and you have a girl bod.

chin ups dont work either ;_;

>Lots of manlets have lanky arms.
>Lots of lanklets have stubby arms.

>Lots
And how much is that? The majority? Where are you taking those statistics from? Why do you have a single digit IQ in this age of information?

Leverages are a result proportion, not objective size.

Do you even know what leverage means?

was more talking about leg length

to use your stupid fucking relativity argument, a lanky arm on a manlet is going to be longer relative to his body than a stubby arm is on a lanklet

guess which arm is actually longer? (hint: it's not the manlets arm)

you forgot leg day again bro

>the majority?
Probably close to 50%

In weight, yes. In the fact that they have to ask females for help to reach the tallest shelf, no.

In terms of relative strength: yes. Not as far as absolute strength is concerned.

>falling for the leg day / ss meme

>look at this epic number i pulled out of my ass
[citation needed]

Objective length doesn't affect leverage.

Ratios and proportions do

Proportions aren't dictated by height, genius.

I dont get it. what does smaller range of motion have to do with there gains???? they still have to push rhe weight to there level ( for example: bench press) are you fags retarded or what

He also forgot back, chest, shoulders, arms, core

That's because you don't eat, gain some weight skeleman

5000 cals
0
0
0

Fit is literally to dumb to understand the concept of leverage being proportional

I never implied it did

I just called you out for spewing statistical bullshit, which you still haven't provided a source for

i did not say leverages specifically were objective. it's pretty pathetic you have so few arguments that you have to resort to strawmen.

a manlet with proportionally average arm length will have to do less work to bench the same weight with full ROM than a lanklet with proportionally average arm length. that is the end. this is a scientific fact. you cannot dispute this, so take your butthurt elsewhere.

>butthurt
Why, because I don't use my height as an excuse to be a weak little bitch?!?

This whole thread reeks of weak minded faggots looking for a scapegoat to be physically weak

poor nutrition.

My wife's brother is the same way; he's like 5'9" with a 6'+ wingspan.

turbomanlet detected

Dude. You look bad.

You look like me, but fatter; I haven't lifted in 6 months, and feel super guilty about it, but at least I'm not you.

Kek.
am 6ft, and lift with a buddy who is 6'3

We both out lift everyone at our gym (because nobody in Alaska even lifts), even the manlets and turbomanlets.

In fact, I have never even seen a manlet press more than 1pl8

I have seen a couple tallbros do it, and my and my buddy both can.

I will say I have kinda stubby arms compared to my 6'3 friend, but I also train harder and smarter than him. He never could into linear progression

F*D=W

Work is force times distance. This is suuuuper basic physics, we're not even talking about lever arms here. If you have to apply the same force over a greater distance, it's going to require more work to complete by definition.

In the real world, if I have longer arms than you, and we're both doing full ROM reps, my bar is going to have to move farther than yours to complete a rep, which means BY DEFINITION, I will have performed more work than you.

try not being a fatass

>trying to convince a single digit IQ owner that laws of physics exist

don't bother
this is the same kind of "person" that makes youtube videos about how the earth is flat

The 50% was meant to imply it is evenly distributed and not dictated by height. It wasn't intended as a specific figure

5'10" - 6'00" is the ideal hight for a human male

bigger frame = more muscle, relative work decreases

I know that in general shorter people have it easier but to flat out say that it's double as hard for someone with double the ROM is retarded

lifting in general greatly depends on your guhnetiks, saying all people shorter than you are at an advantage is retarded

Almost all of the strongest lifters in every field (strongman, oly, I actually don't know or give a shit about pl) aren't manlets.

This thread is just excuses for the weak-minded

for aesthetics it's 6ft-6ft1

t. 5ft11 manlet

>being on Veeky Forums so long you actually honk an inch of height affects aesthetics

This place is pure psychological poison, it's hilarious

>not honking an inch of height affects aesthetics
Not gonna make it

a shithole full of autists, superautists and anti-social nerds can't deliver anything but bullshit
honestly, what good has ever come from this site? it's a timesink pseudo-social exchange for outcasts

I'm talking about ideal

fit height memes are autistic

People who spout this garbage have never tried to actually eat 5000 calories in one day

6ft1 sweet spot for height? Get fucked, 6ft3 is the best height.

yall niggers need physics.
read on why ants are strong, while an elephant can't jump.