Why are the japanese so fascinated with the Yamato? It was completly useless and it didn't accomplish anything during the war.
Why are the japanese so fascinated with the Yamato...
Justin Torres
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Matthew Miller
>It was completly useless and it didn't accomplish anything during the war.
Goes for all battleships. It's the phallic shape and huge size, low test males love it.
Easton Martin
The Littorio Class was far better desu
Nathan Walker
sounds like japan in general
Logan Campbell
It was big. Yes, it's that simple.
Jose Williams
Japanese autism at it's finest
>HEY HIROSHI WHY DON'T WE BUILD A LARGE BATTLESHIP THAT WOULD PROBABLY EAT UP OUR RESOURCES
>HEY YAMAGI WHY DON'T WE BUILD AIRCRAFT CARRYING SUBMARINES THAT WE WOULD USE TO ATTACK THE WEST COAST
Juan King
>AIRCRAFT CARRYING SUBMARINES
Was that really a thing?
Jackson Roberts
...
Samuel Lopez
Jonathan Reed
sorry Luigi, but if I want a 35,000 ton European battleship I'm getting a Richelieu, not a pasta catapult
Lucas Carter
>disliking battleships
Adam Evans
compenation
Asher Gonzalez
wouldn't the planes get wet?
Bentley Jones
Big girls are cute.
Connor Walker
It's basically WW2 era gundam.
Evan Thompson
No
They'd remove the wings of the plane and put it inside it's hangar.
They'll only fly when the submarine surfaces and they were given the go signal
Jaxon Thompson
Kongou~~
Aiden Hill
Not if they're sea-to-air planes
Evan Barnes
Kuffar
Caleb Rodriguez
> Richelieu
T A S T E
Landon Thomas
Granny.
Lincoln Fisher
They are cool and awesome, but still completely useless and wasteful of resources.
Hunter Wright
it's a big ship
Anthony Collins
E S T H É T I Q U E
Levi Cook
Battleships were kinda ok in the Atlantic. The Scharnhorst and the Gneisenau actually took out a Carrier with their main batteries.
Adrian Davis
This. As long as you have enough bases close enough to cover the airspace, carriers are less vittal than in the Pacific
Carson Brooks
Wouldn't the floor being wet be extremely dangerous?