Why is the West dying?

impiety. Since the republics have come to their definitive end as outlined by Plato (universal suffrage) it is time to begin the process of ending the republics all together and replacing them with aristocracies .

>Mathematics is neo-liberal globalist propaganda
hurrrrrrrrrrr durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

>feminism
False, hardcore capitalism destroyed the birth rate.

The downward trend started in 1950 dumbass. If you can't read a fucking graph get of Veeky Forums.

Literally when did I say/imply that in ?

these

feminism is revolutionary and instable, whereas capitalism is a system that demands a stable enviornment. Hence the two are opposed, just look at how modern feminists and previous ones hated capitalism.

It's not. The rest of the world that they cannibalized to achieve their earlier gains are now recovering - China faster than most.

It requires a stable environment if it wishes to function properly, and it can function properly when handled with restraint. That is no longer the case.

Thinking that feminists hate capitalism is patently false too, most of the liberal and neoliberal feminists are hardcore capitalists. Where the hell do you think that the push to get as many women on the job market (driving down wages greatly while increasing production) came from?

discord.gg/m9vH92 come for gf

>Historical discussions should be focused on past events, and not their contemporary consequences.
Come on now.

>Thinking that feminists hate capitalism is patently false too, most of the liberal and neoliberal feminists are hardcore capitalists

they need hate, but also they need capitalism as such because without engaging in competition, conflict and power relations their whole entire discourse becomes void, and any sort of asertion of control or political sucess becomes impossible if there isnt a point that can be made into a problem, so capitalism gives them both a arena to compete with men and so affirm their ideological values or have something to be against and so affirm the ideological critique

they would do this in any economic system any way, but liberal capitalism is particularly adequate for this because the marked dosent care what you have betveen your legs, wether youre married or do you have kids or not, and you are simply expected to compete and survive like everione else, its not so much a right as a set of inevitable conditions for individual survival

so the emancipated woman model only fully functions in a liberal capitalist market, almost ironicaly its precisely what the system forces single women to be out of necesity and lack of better alternatives, the average 'emancipated woman' is in that sense someone single, making ends meet from month to month in a job that she probably didnt graduate for and so is likely underpayed or the job is just shitty, unless shes working 12 hours a day because thats called having a career, and maybe having to care for a elderly parent and/or dog

this last part is pretty much the only thing that differs from how the average single man functions in a liberal capitalist economy except the shitty job is usualy more shitty in that it involves more physical strain and stress, single men tend to drink and gamble more and some pay alimony

realy its market forces and financial necessity that equalize men and women, in the sense that they reduce them both to stressed out alienated, powerless proleterians

The west is becoming less white.

It isn't, the West is just killing the rest of the world at a slower rate

The framework of the question is wrong. The west isn't dying. Its just already peaked its potential for growth. The west is fully developed already.

The real question is will the rest of the world, at least the China/India part become developed? And most analysts will say of course. Its just a matter of timeline. China's accelerating its timeline fastest. India is slowly going that route.

The historic equilibrium will be reached sometime in the next 30 years. And in the next 30 years after that, the world will return to historical economic output. With China/India dominating the world economy and US having the fair share of west.

It isn't. What's happening is that, for the first time in several centuries, the West has some actual, legit, serious competition - and that's in Asia.

Because the West is gradually rotting in the core while extremely lacking of self awareness, such as degenerated libercucks are even still blindly pretending they're building an Utopia for people but don't even realize they're poisoning the entire world to death; the conservatives are no better as well, they blame everything to Jews, to Chinese, to Muslims, except themselves.

Thank goodness China is rising again now, I hope they can stop such menace.

Go pay for your lunch Zhang.

CHINESE
E
N
T
U
R
Y

Feminism is literally a crapitalist creation. New market niches

That's why feminists are all socialistic cunts, right?

First about americans have no clue about what socialism is/means. It's just a buzzword. Americans love buzzwords because they require little to no thinking

Second, most of the reactionary "socialism" is also a capitalist product. All those retards who "fight the system" buy en masse "socialist merchandising" and do not represent a single menace to the capitalist status quo. They're just useful idiots for the market, like the altright. All they do is making money for somebody who profits from their retardedness.

Feminists in USA claiming to be/support "socialism" mean jack shit to the stablishment. And americans who fear that 'le communist menace' in the XXI century are just another brainwashed market niche to appeal and profit from

>socialism is captialism goy

Nice doublethink, commie.

>american reading skills
Less than surprised

>my only argument is pretending to be European

Whatever helps you feels good, burger

>Out of arguments

Good, you can fuck off back to /leftypol/ where your talking points and no true scotsman bullshit came from.

>out of arguments
>his reply was calling me a communist and a larper
Have a last (you), Jimbo

>>>/leftypol/
>>>/reddit/

Fuck off, commie!

>That's why feminists are all socialistic cunts, right?
>all
Hard to take you seriously when you use absurd overgeneralizations.

That guy was literally parroting fascist rhetoric, you cuck.

>16th century estimates of national GDP
It was invented in the 1930s and depends on good census information. These charts are such a joke. There's no way I can see they would have realistic way to estimate China's GDP back then.

bump

While you are right, its not that life was any more comfortable before liberal capitalism for either sex

>The west is fully developed already.

Eh, debatable. For me, this would mean that each and every citizen has his fair share of disposable income and perhaps even property. But in fact, most of the population owes next to nothing.

We are also regressing in some aspects, such as equality of opportunity and job security lately. Even in life expectancy, for some Americans.

Kys bernout.

Leftism destroyed the western world.

>his fair share

Wealthy people have fewer or no children.

Well this thread was ruined from the start I see

I bet he supports open borders too. Paco needs his fair share!

Whites are an inferior race

>western world
>leftism

Excellent post my mass replying faggot