Antishinto Antishintoism Ametaphysics Antimetaphysics

Antishinto

Kami are supposed to be agency bearers. Agency here means "living potential". No data supports that. Neuroscience via fMRIs has proven that a functional brain is required in order humans are alive. The fact that Shinto isn't Caucasian doesn't constitute it valid. Follow #antishinto on Twitter.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mEN7DTdHbAU
youtube.com/watch?v=cezltcn9Mv0
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entanglement_distillation
phys.org/news/2015-07-supersymmetry-physics-theory.html
youtube.com/watch?v=J3xLuZNKhlY
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Elementary_particle_interactions.svg
youtube.com/watch?v=NNnIGh9g6fA
kibin.com/essay-examples/an-analysis-of-the-shinto-religion-shitoism-sb4ZH2PI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>The fact that Shinto isn't Caucasian doesn't constitute it valid.

What did they mean by this?

anti...spiral?

Some Japanese Shintoists claim that the Kami aren't the same as the Abrahamic God, and use that as an excuse for nonscientific belief.

The only solution is to analyze the hollow metalogics of Kami!

>Neuroscience via fMRIs has proven that a functional brain is required in order humans are alive.

Explain who made feels pictures like then. Or all the other ones.

antispiritualism, antisupersensuality, antireligion etc.

If religion was true, we would record arbitrary statistical errors in particle experiments.

Physics is hard, but by no means random. Even noise follows patterns.

If Kami or God(s) merely obeyed the physical patterns, they wouldn't have free will. If spirits were merely physical patterns they simply wouldn't exist as self-aware agents (lifegivers), thus they don't exist as teached, and actually they don't exist at all being useless. Only physics does explain the universal mechanics.

One cannot generate false statistical patterns that mimic reality, because quantum entanglement won't work, neither will the Bell test experiments.

>If religion was true, we would record arbitrary statistical errors in particle experiments.
That follows, not, but we do record fundamental statistical errors in particle experiments. Whether or not they are 'arbitrary' doesn't sound like a well-defined query to me. They can be bounded, and their pdfs accurately predicted.

>Physics is hard, but by no means random.
Physics isn't that hard, but it is intrinsically random, on a microscopic and macroscopic level. Quantum mechanical limitations on predictability are not due to any limitations of theory or measurement, but because the events themselves occur discretely and there is no continuous state to speak of or to solve as a differential equation. Only on the macroscopic scale does it become smooth enough to even talk about an ontological state as a function of time, but because everything more complicated than a mathematically perfect harmonic oscillator is chaotic, the fundamental limits of quantum mechanics creep into macroscopic systems, even with 'perfect' information.

>even noise follows patterns
No, it doesn't. That's the definition of noise, maximal entropy with no underlying pattern.

Quantum entanglement is a consequence of conservation laws, it's really not that spoopy.

Sorry for shitting up your Veeky Forums
t.physicist

>If religion was true, we would record arbitrary statistical errors in particle experiments.

go away Imperial Cult

You're not a good student of "physics" as you claim. The Planckian noise has statistical characteristics. Also if we use higher energy for detection, more and heavier particles are produced, this is absolutely analogous after many experiments. Are the Kami servants of the human power? No! Kami and Gods don't exist. Only Quantum Fields!

youtube.com/watch?v=mEN7DTdHbAU

Actual noise cannot exist. Only degrees of pseudonoise. Noise means the least possible systemic cohesion, but that NEVER is zero!

Noise always has some dynamic range and some canonical patterns.

Quantum Fields have many rules to be genuinely random. The more rules it has and the shorter a quantized dynamic range of a system is, the less random it gets. Not all virtual interactions are equally probable; that is an extra restriction. A truly random universe wouldn't have any particle at all. A particle is a result of accumulative chromodynamic pseudorandomness. With large numbers of data-recordings and statistics, we understand the interactions of the fields.

Big Bang was a ubiquitous fallout of a disturbed dynamic amplitude of the Planckian noise. Our parental universe was extremely old, sparse, cold and with a rapid passage of time, because all matter had decayed; thus wasn't any means to stop the luminar in speed expansion.

Fuck off, Gook.

>humans need this to live
>therefore kami do too

Your arguments are so bad I went down to the shrine and bought a charm to protect myself from ever becoming this dumb, OP.

Are you trying to be the next @imperialcult?

ITT: Creationists in Engrish.

You make the mistake of assuming that visible systems are

1. The only typology of systems that can affect a dimensional manifold
2. That visible systems are the only valid systems

We're mostly creatures who get their information about photons. For the most part, most of our information is from systems that blast out information in photon form aka sight and, by manipulating visible data, visual imagination.

You just don't have a creative mind that can fathom that our typology of systems is only one out of a (possible) infinite set.

Why are the retarded religions on this board multiplying

Vision is just a word. We are supposed to elaborate. We see because photons bump on our receptors. Seeing is tactile. Even neutrinos interact with matter, but extremely rarely. youtube.com/watch?v=cezltcn9Mv0 The speed of causality, is the speed of light. In quantum entanglement, we have one wavefunction for many particles... actually these many particles are "one monster particle" because the particle is it's wave function. Quantum entanglement seems as immediate action at a distance, simply because we observers live inside the wave function of the Universe. For the Universe itself, quantum entanglements of its components always exist at some degree. Even randomly assembled particles, because they're so many inside a universe, tend to have all possible tunings, and entanglements (= same tunings) occur naturally. Also partial entanglements have a measurable statistical impact on particle interactions. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entanglement_distillation

Particles are statistical phenomena of the fields, not mereologically simple objects as the Platonic spheres. Frank Wilczek with his SUSY (supersymmetry) and many others try erroneously to "force into existence" an imaginary interaction among bosons, which have an integer-valued spin, and fermions, which have a half-integer spin, with the intermediate fallacious "superpartners". In real life, bosons and fermions interact within a probabilistic spectrum of statistically allowed interactions. From particle experiments we know that the same particles can interact with googolplex different ways, but each specific interaction has a different probability density, thus a different statistical frequency of occurrence. Particles who aren't allowed to interact with specific others, they indirectly and statistically do in the end, because they interact with known intermediate particles, which in turn interact with the initial particles. The highly energetic interactions produce complex intermediate stages of known particles. SUSY does not exist in the natural word or in the lab; instead only in the fantasy of some devotees.

phys.org/news/2015-07-supersymmetry-physics-theory.html

OP is probably high as fuck right now nothing to see here lads

Sure religion is a spook, but do you really need a particular ism for 1 relatively unpopular untroublesome religion?

Do you believe this makes you a big hero?

All particles do interact with other particles, but the frequency, the strength and the (in)directness vary. Even the empty void isn't empty, because chromodynamic Planckian pseudorandom (seemingly random, but with limitations and a quantized dynamic range) noise dwells there.

youtube.com/watch?v=J3xLuZNKhlY

Everything interacts somehow and that has a measurable statistical impact on other particles.

upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Elementary_particle_interactions.svg

Even dark matter is visible because it distorts telescope vision due to the resulting gravitational lensing (the shape of galaxies behind it).
Dark matter causes changes to the photonic energy and to the luminar path.

Galactic stars interlock their gravitational propagating waves (read: gravitational wave, propagating wave, standing wave, wave packet) to the overall galactic gravitational standing wave.

The gravitational standing waves are stronger at certain orders of magnitude due to harmonious amplification. The least common multiple resulting from the baryonic energy causes that phenomenon. All particles are phenomenons which emerge out of interactions. It's very hard to record enough baryons emerging as statistically significant phenomena.

It means that it's only considered cool to bash white people religions. Non-whites are allowed to believe in magic and shit like that because of their "culture" or something.

Philosophy is to analyze notions and their mereological interconnection. People don't live forever. All people die one day. Being intelligent in the dark isn't enough. Others cannot read your mind if you don't speak or write. People tend to communicate and exchange ideas; we call that culture. The living cuture is only the recorded part of our ideas. Nonrecorded opinions aren't part of culture. Memory is the most important aspect of the human intellect. One cannot be intelligent without a memory recording mechanism, because he/she will have to invent again and again everyday simple things in order to survive. Without memory one cannot follow an equation, if you burn the previous paper notes you destroy the written memory of the solution of equation, if you keep them on paper or in your mind, they are stored data = memory. Some people suffer from memory loss, and cannot perform properly mental work. We must record our ideas, but our ideas must be functional. Religion has functional aspects possitive for the community. We must maintain all festivals, but without to believe in the myths, and instead of temples we will watch documentaries and popularizers of science will talk. The science temple will also have a library, free Wi-Fi and free food in some occasions in order we feel at home.

Political friendly ecological and hippy leftists always avoid conflict, because conflict is potentially racistic as they claim.

Philosophy dies if one believes that analytical thought and aware choice isn't friendly thus must be banished.

Dark matter is a "gravitational stellar interlock" which being heavy slows the pace of the passage of time (it slows timeflow). Dark matter is a result of large groups of matter at the galactic and cluster orders of magnitude, but has its own field inertia. In Bullet cluster we have observed that dark matter has a different degree of inertia than baryonic matter. Also dark matter - when generated by baryonic matter - appears and disappears gradually and not immediately, because the fields of the fundamental forces have a relative inertia among each other. The universal density and the timeflow (= passage of time pace) exhibit inertia. Big bangs occur, when a component of the metafield (= relation among all fields) inertia is inadequate.

Dark energy is intrinsic to spacetime (spacetime = the universal wave function); and it is the result of the repulsion among the fields themselves. It's innate to the universal metamaterial (= all the fields together), and when a universe gets extremely old, nor matter neither dark matter exist in adequate quantities to slow the metarepulsion and a big bang occurs.

pure guesswork

Schizophrenia and megalomania.

The motherfuckers think they have truth by the balls but forget that truth is a unicorn hiding in the set of all possible propositions and the set of all sensible statements about the world.

And then they have the audacity for berating people for not accepting their special snowflake propositional system! At least I'm curbed by the notion of Maya, who can pop the bubble of "reality" at any time and take me to another "reality", like thin robes that just get replaced.

What the hell is this? Also who the fuck even practices Shinto anymore?

You got a kek out of me

>he wouldn't visit the shrine of best goddess.

What a fag.

>You will never trap Amaterasu in an infinite bukkake

Time to drink cyanide.

Thanks, I thought what he was saying made sense until your post.

Who cares enough about Shinto to get mad about it?
Even the supposed adherents are largely honoring tradition more than anything.

You mean schizotypism, Schizophrenia has different symptoms. Even chainsaw killers are schizotypical.The schizophrenic isn't able to complete complex tasks, neither to follow a plan. Watch on YouTube these series of Stanford University lectures. youtube.com/watch?v=NNnIGh9g6fA

Religious leaders, priests, sages, philosophers, theorists even scientific ones belong to the schizotypical spectrum.

Modern society is using the same brains as the archaic ones. We are the offspring of the cave man. Culture evolves faster than human physiology.

The new generation of schizotypoids fights against the old, or the protectors of the old hypoformalisms. The basic hyperformalism remains almost the same... merely with more data instead of stones and myths. Always theories are interpretations of facts. Facts if well attested are more important than opinions, interpretations and theories.

Even Plato was absolute about his "perfect geometrical bodies", but also wrong, because he arbitrarily selected some symmetrical polyhedrons. These polyhedrons are by no means fundamental notions, because one must use more fundamental constituents in order to construct them.

The modern physics of the fundamental Planckian realm is based on matrix theory.

No pure Patonic set exists, because the values of these matrices are relative to other ones.

There is a connectome of events, but not absolute definitions at the fundamental level. Matter is only partially defined. A thoroughly defined physics would create topological statues, not evolving topological algorithms called universes.

__

Supporting the Mayan Empire isn't wise though. They were extremely violent against other tribes. Many sacrificial bones exist as evidence. Also they recorded their religious crimes in stone, on papyri and on paintings. Some Spaniards copied few original paintings.

Modern Native Americans - under the same conditioning - are causing more crimes than East Asians and Caucasians, but less than Africans.

反神道

kibin.com/essay-examples/an-analysis-of-the-shinto-religion-shitoism-sb4ZH2PI

That's not Inari.