Not a meme, I swear

Not a meme, I swear.
How would a world without black people be without the quoting inventions meme.
Just, all black people dissapear in the 15th century.
All you can find from this question is a list of things we would "lack" without their black inventors, such as things as the iron for clothes, which was supossedly invented by a black person except that before that people used a hollow iron with coal inside.
Anyway, just curious because if you look it up it's just buzzfeed pandering or people yelling insults at each other in the white supremacist forums.

Africa would be the breadbasket of the world and a major global power.

Africa would be a second America, where Europeans pour their excess population.
It would be admittedly quite awesome.

Slave labor isnt a thing.
Euroniggers would remain poor in America and rely on motherlands even more.
USA won't be a thing.

All good.

>millions of whites are going to move into areas where the tropical diseases are so deadly that slavers sustained higher casualties in the tropical crossings than their slaves, and survive
without blacks most of sub-saharan africa except for a fringe at the base would be a severely underpopulated wasteland

Arab slave economy collapses into a period of prolonged crisis, Barbary slave raids intensify.
European expansion in the Age of Discovery is massively slowed, without local laborers to build and trade with for food and resources it is much harder to establish footholds on the African coast.
Without the Triangular Trade, the New World is also colonized much slower.

What if the rich black kingdoms developed normally and the equally modern europeans treated them as equal?
Would africa be europe 2?

Well if blacks disappeared before colonization, malaria would also disappear as the parasites lose their hosts.
Other diseases are not so bad, and Europeans were able to populate some parts of Africa regardless.

Diseases were also a problem in America and Europeans multiplied anyway.

America would be a failed state. There wouldn't be any America as a country.

They would experience the same fate as the Indian and East Asian states, vassalization or conquest.
Some like Ethiopia might defend their independence.

malaria affects many animals, and many more can be carriers.

Equal world sounds like best timeline. BLM screechers would be happy because blacks would have been successful and relevant and blacks wouldn't be looked down upon.

Plasmodium's primary host is the female mosquito, not humans. I think it can gestate in other vertebrates, can't it?

The strain that is deadly to humans only infect humans (and mosquitoes, yes).

world peace and progress

Elaborate.

I don't think you understand just how bad the tropical diseases were. In 1893 in Senegal, an old and established French colony, the death rate was 73 per thousand. This was for an adult population, not including children. In Europe, the death rate was often around 25-30 per thousand in the early 19th century.

This means the death rate is more than twice, maybe three times as high, but this isn't among a population which composes children who died like flies and elderly. This is among healthy male adults. Not only that, but it is among healthy male adults who have the benefit of living off of a local population, instead of having to produce for themselves.

This isn't even mentioning that the Europeans would bring their own diseases along with them. Not only would they have to deal with their own diseases and the death rates of that, but any tropical diseases.

The death rates in tropical Africa for any European population would mean that it wouldn't be self-sustaining, and would be a population sink-hole rather than seeing population growth. Removing blacks doesn't impact in any way the diseases present, the blacks are the victims, not the incubators, of malaria

This wasn't just unique to tropical africa btw, there's a reason why the Caribbean is mostly black - because it was a death sentence for Europeans to be stationed there.

>death sentence
>under 1% mortality
Hyperboles are bad.
The Caribbeans are mostly black because between rich landowners and slaves there was little room for colonists.

As for Senegal, it was the worst of the French colonies regarding diseases.

>Removing blacks doesn't impact in any way the diseases present, the blacks are the victims, not the incubators, of malaria
Yes it does. Humans are a necessary step in the life cycle of plasmodium falciparum. No humans, no parasites of the human species.

You know quinine fucked up female reproduction (as long as the woman uses it)?

And malaria can easily make the jump to humans in a short time just like any other tropical disease

>How would a world without black people be without the quoting inventions meme.

This makes no fucking sense at all. That's like saying what if Ethiopia joined the fucking axis. In which fucking illogical chain if events would cause either scenario to happen?

Portugal doesn’t waste as much money on Kongo to find Prester John as they did IRL.
Northern America gets the same economic development as South America because you don’t have gentry with masses of slaves but lords with lots of serfs, thus the Irish population never reaches a stage to where there can be famines
Indians and Arabian slave trade will be used much more

With North America that poor then Britain keeps allies because it doesn’t become a world power by the war of Austrian succession, the napoleonic wars might not even happen because France is never bankrupted in its disastrous American wars perhaps

>What if the rich black kingdoms developed normally and the equally modern europeans treated them as equal?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!!!

No the nigger will always be a stupid beast belonging to the mesolithic era not the civilized world.

Epic based whiteposter!!
Blackies BTFO!!!
Praise KEK!!